Administrative Tribunals
Administrative Tribunals legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Legislative history.
Administrative Tribunals Tribunal adjudicating upon civil rights of parties-Bound to act judicially and follow fundamental rules of evidence and fair-play embodied in principles of natural justice.
Administrative Tribunals Judicial, quasi judicial, or administrative tribunals Precise definition not possible Considerations for correct determination Certiorari Where lies Judicial or quasi judicial orders Lack of jurisdiction Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 170.
"Administrative Tribunals", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2218
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Administrative Tribunals"
1981SCMR250
BOOR-UZ-ZAMAN AHMAD-Petitioner Versus THE PUNJAB SERVICES TRIBUNAL AND OTHERS-Respondents
Court: -- Ss. 3 & 7 as amended by Punjab Administrative Tribunals (Amend ment) Ordinance (IX of 1975), S. 5-Quorum--Administrative Tribunal having consisted of two members and a Chairman, disposal of case by two members, held, not warranted by law-Section 7 authorising disposal of cases by remaining two members (no Chairman having been then appointed) having been deleted by Ordinance IX of 1975, before disposal of case in hand reference to such section, held further, of no avail.2025 P L C (C
The BOARD OF GOVERNOR through Chairman, Khyber Teaching Hospital (MTI), Peshawar and another Versus KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA MEDICAL TEACHING INSTITUTIONS, APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PESHAWAR
Court: Peshawar High Court1980 P Cr
MUHAMMAD YAQOOB‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: High Court1980 S C M R 541
MUHAMMAD AKRAM-Appellant Versus ABDUL GHAFOOR ETC. — Respondents
Court: ----- S. 119 and West Pakistan Municipal Committee (Appeals) Rules, 1960, r. 1 read with West Pakistan Municipal Servants (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules 1963, r.40 and Punjab Adminis trative Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), S. 4--Appeal by Municipal servant in respect of a service matter against order of Municipal Committee or Administrator-Held, does not lie to Deputy Commissioner as a controlling authority-Punjab Administrative Tribunal also lacked jurisdiction to entertain such an appeal Jurisdiction-Civil service.P L D 2022 Supreme Court 699
NAUSHER — Appellant Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through District Collector, Khanewal and another — Respondents
Court: High Court2024 P L C (C
Syed ASGHAR ALI SHAH and another Versus KALEEM ARSHAD and others
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2024 S C M R 563
Syed ASGHAR ALI SHAH and another — Petitioners Versus KALEEM ARSHAD and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1979 S C M R 498
MUHAMMAD ISMAIL‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB‑‑Respondent
Court: ----Ss. 7 & 8 read with Punjab Administrative Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Ss. 3 & 4, proviso (b) and Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 212(2)‑Civil servant ‑‑ Seniority ‑ Promotion Jurisdiction Seniority and promotion of civil servants‑Included in, and pertain to, terms and conditions of service‑Civil servant aggrieved by any final order, whether original or appellate, made b, Departmental authority, m respect of any of terms and conditions of service including disciplinary matter, being required to prefer an appeal to Tribunal under S. 4 of Act IX of 1974 and proviso (b) barring appeal before Tribunal against order or decision of Departmental authority determining fitness or otherwise of a person to be appointed to, or to hold, a particular post, or to be appointed to a higher post or grade and no other Court having power to grant injunction or make any order in respect of matters falling within jurisdiction of such Administrative Court or Tribunal, Administrative Tribunal, held, possessed exclusive jurisdiction to hear disputes in such matters and suit before civil Court not competent.‑Jurisdiction‑Civil services.1979 P L C (C
NAZIR AHMED KHAN Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR
Court: Service Tribunal Azad J & KP L D 1982 Lahore 264
Ch: GHULAM RASOOL‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB‑Respondent
Court: Art. 9 read with Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts. 199 & 212‑Jurisdiction‑Article 9 of Provisional Constitution Order, 1981 having placed fetters on powers of High Court to issue writs inter alia in respect of matters covered by Art. 212, High Court, held, can not issue writ in such regard.‑Writ.