Admiralty Action
Admiralty Action legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Maritime lien means legal proceedings in an appropriate form to have the ship seized by the officers of the Court and made available by sale if not released on bail
Proceedings so initiated are called action in rem against res
Word "res" in the legal parlance in context of an admiralty action connotes a limited number of things such as ships and their cargoes and freights.
[Words and phrases].
"Admiralty Action", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2219
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Admiralty Action"
1999 Y L R 989
ARMOR SHIPPING AGENT‑‑‑Appellant Versus M.V. RUBIN ‑‑‑Respondent
Court: KarachiP L D 1986 Karachi 447
COMPAGNIE CONTINENTALE (FRANCE) S. A.‑Plaintiff Versus PAKISTAN NATIONAL SHIPPING CORPORATION AND 2 OTHERS‑Defendants
Court: ‑‑S. 3(2)(h)‑Words `any agreement'‑Meaning‑Nature of claim in respect of which admiralty action can be filed under S. 3 (2) (h). Words and phrases.P L D 1981 Karachi 246
BANGLADESH SHIPPING CORPORATION‑Appellant Versus M. v. `NEDON' AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: S. 7(1)‑Admiralty jurisdiction‑Action in rem‑Action in rem lies against ship without making it defendant‑Real defendants described as owner of or persons interested in shin‑Writ of arrest may be effected by serving it on ship and such writ may be accepted by master or owner or by nailing or pasting it on mast or other conspicuous part of ship-owner or person interested in res appearing and putting defence, such person, held, becomes party to action and personally liable for what ever decreed against him.‑Jurisdiction1992 C L C 833
Before Syed Haider Ali Pirzada, J Versus m.v. NARAN and 3 others‑‑‑Defendants
Court: KarachiP L D 1989 Karachi 65
INHAM REFRIGERATION b.v. — Plaintiff Versus The OWNERS OF "F.T.PARIVASH" and "TRANSOCEAN HOLDINGS LTD." — Defendants
Court: ---S. 4(4)--Admiralty jurisdiction--Term 'Wages'--Meaning, scope and import of--Where a seaman was entitled to receive any amount or benefit which could be translated into money on account of his services as a seaman, same would be covered by the definition of 'wages' and could be the subject-matter of an Admiralty suit under Ordinance XLII of 1980--Plaintiff, however, in such suit should be either the seaman himself or his authorised agent--Where in suit 'A' the decree prima facie was not for wages by a seaman or by his authorised agent on his behalf, such plaintiff could not have priority over the plaintiff in suit 'B'--Decrees in other suit relating to supplies of necessaries etc. would come after the decree of plaintiff in suit 'B' in priority, the latter being mortgagee of the vessel--Priority in other cases would be, firstly, the decrees on account of wages, secondly, decrees on account of Master's wages and disbursement if any, thirdly, decree on mortgages, fourthly. necessaries and repairs and lastly ordinary decrees.--Words and phrases.P L D 1981 Karachi 419
Before Ajmal Mian, J Versus s. s. "NENDN"‑Defendant
Court: Read with Evidence Act (I of 1872), Ss. 33, 80 & 157‑Admiralty suit Preliminary inquiry‑Staternents of witnesses recorded by Inquiry officer----Held, cannot be used us as substantive evidence unless formally proved and brought on record.‑Evidence.P L D 1993 Supreme Court 88
ATLANTIC STEAMER'S SUPPLY COMPANY ‑Appellant Versus m.v. TITISEE and others ‑‑‑ Respondents
Court: ‑‑"Maritime lien"‑‑‑Definition ‑‑‑ Maritime lien means legal proceedings in an appropriate form to have the ship seized by the officers of the Court and made available by sale if not released on bail ‑‑‑ Proceedings so initiated are called action in rem against res‑‑‑Word "res" in the legal parlance in context of an admiralty action connotes a limited number of things such as ships and their cargoes and freights.‑‑Words and phrases.1985 C L C 1355
Messrs ALEXANDER G. TSAVLIRIS & SONS-Plaintiffs Versus m.v. RICE TRADERS and others — Defendants
Court: Karachi1999 C L C 996
SIKANDAR‑‑‑Petitioner Versus M.T. EASTERN NAVIGATER and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: KarachiP L D 2019 Sindh 533
SELAT MARINE SERVICES CO. LLC through Authorized Attorney — Plaintiff Versus M.T. BOFORS and 2 others — Defendants
Court: High Court