Home Maxims & Terms Ministerial Establishment Rules meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Ministerial Establishment Rules

Ministerial Establishment Rules legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1961 PLD 105 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ministerial Establishment Rulesr. 1, cl. (c)

Office memorandum dated 15th March 1948, para. 5-Whether instructions contained in Memorandum may be treated as statutory rules-Fixing of seniority of Government servant-Whether solely a matter for Administrative Authorities-Service "continuous" but in different Department-Application of para. 5, Office Memorandum dated 15th March 1948.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Ministerial Establishment Rules", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22202

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Ministerial Establishment Rules"

PLD 1961
29th November 1960

P L D 1961 Supreme Court 105

PAKISTAN‑Appellant Versus Sheikh ABDUL HAMID‑Respondent

Court: High Court
PLC(CS) 1971
Case No. 220/159 of 1970, decided on 12th October 1970.

1971 P L C 29 [C

MUHAMMAD SHARIF BUTT Versus PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN AND 4 OTHERS.

Court: 1971 P L C 29 C.S.T.
PLC(CS) 1980
Appeal No. 138/798 of 1976, decided on 27th May, 1977.

1980 P L C (C

S. MUHAMMAD RAFIQ SHAH Versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Court: Service Tribunal Punjab
PLD 1966
Civil Appeal No. 35 of 1963, decided on 2nd November 1965

P L D 1966 Supreme Court 188

(2) THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES, WEST PAKISTAN, LAHORE‑Appellants Versus DR. A. A. AZIZ, MEDICAL SUPERINTENDENT, GOVERNMENT MENTAL HOSPITAL, LAHORE‑Respondent

Court: (b) Establishment of West Pakistan Act, 1955, S. 8(3 proviso (b)‑Specialists appointment made after coming into force of Act‑Proviso (b) inapplicable though couched in "wide terms"‑High Court's order setting aside, by mandamus, Government order of transfer of such appointee, from one station to another, without his consent, upheld by Supreme Court, in circumstances of case (per Kaikaus, J., S. A. Rahman, Fazle Akbar, Hamoodur Rahman, JJ. agreeing; Cornelius, C. J preferring to look at matter as one falling within regulation of an established service, rather than as a case of "special contract"‑ "Instructions" issued by Government in connection with post, not less binding upon Governments, than if such instructions were incorporated in Rules of service)‑Post of Medical Superintendent, Mental Hospital, Lahore.
SCMR 1991
Civil Appeals Nos.28-Q and 29-Q of 1987, decided on 19th August, 1990.

1991 S C M R 1203

S & GAD, Quetta — Appellant Versus AMIR JAN and 10 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
SCMR 1984
Civil Appeal No. 340 of 1981, decided on 26th May, 1984.

1984 S C M R 957

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB‑‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD BASHIR‑Respondent

Court: ---Art. 185(3)‑West Pakistan Revenue Department District Ministerial Service Rules, 1964, rr. 2 (i), 5(8), 11 & Appendix---District Office Manual, para. 3.5‑Leave to appeal granted to examine question of law whether on enforcement of West Pakistan Revenue Department District Ministerial Service Rules, 1964, provisions of para. 3.5, District Office Manual ceased to have effect and stood repeal by necessary implication.‑Civil service.
PLD 1957
Suit No. 639 of 1952, decided on 28th November 1956.

P L D 1957 (W

ABDUL KHAIR WALIULLAH-Applicant-Plaintiff Versus THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Court:
PLC(CS) 1994
Appeal No. 621 of 1990, decided on 23rd April, 1992.

1994 P L C (C

FAZAL‑UR‑REHMAN KHAN Versus DIRECTOR OF INDUSTRIES AND MINERAL DEVELOPEMENT DEPARTMENT, PUNJAB, LAHORE and another

Court: Service Tribunal Punjab
PLD 1959
1958 Civil Appeal No. 9 of 1958, decided on 17th November 1958.

P L D 1959 Supreme Court (Pak

PAKISTAN‑Appellant Versus LIAQUAT ALI KHAN‑Respondent

Court:
PLC(CS) 1996
N/A

1996 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD BASHIR BALOCH Versus CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD and 5 others

Court: Federal Service Tribunal