Terminal Tax
Terminal Tax legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Terminal Tax History of legislation-Karachi Municipal Act 1933, S. 96 (2) (b).
"Terminal Tax", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22212
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Terminal Tax"
P L D 1979 Karachi 604
NATIONAL MARBLE INDUSTRIES LTD. Petitioner Versus KARACHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION-Respondent
Court: Read with Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 2-Vires of statutes-Legislature empowered to give retrospective operation to any statute-Very object of validating statute being to confer validity upon actions not valid at time of their occurrence, validating statute not invalid on such account-Article 2 of Constitution (1973), held, placed no fetters on legislative powers of sovereign Legislature and Ordinance VIII of 1967 a valid piece of legislation.--Ghularn Zamin v. A. B. Khondkar P L D 1975 Dacca 156 dissented from.-Vires of statutes.P L D 1967 Supreme Court 241
PAKISTAN TOBACCO Co. LTD: Appellant Versus KARACHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
Court:P L D 1982 Karachi 870
MESSRS JAMIA INDUSTRIES LTD.‑Appellants Versus KARACHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1963 Supreme Court 137
OTHERS‑Appellants Versus ADMINISTRATOR OF KARACHI AND TWO OTHERS‑‑ Respondents
Court: (c) City of Karachi Municipal Corporation Act (XVII of 1933), S. 96 (2) (b) read with Constitution of Pakistan (1956), Fifth Sched., List I (Federal List), Item No. 26, and List 111 (Provincial List) Item No. 89‑Terminal tax‑"Provincial Governments' of Karachi not competent to revise schedule of terminal tax in regard to goods brought within Municipal limits by "sea or air" as distinguished from those brought by "road" or "railway"‑Chief Commissioner, Karachi v. Jamil Ahmad P L D 1961 S C 145 ref.1988 S C M R 1259
KARACHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION‑‑Appellant Versus Messrs HARJINA SALT CHEMICALS (PAK .) LTD. and 3 others‑‑Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1978 Karachi 244
PAKISTAN‑Appellant Versus MESSRS AMEEJEE VALEEJEE & SONS AND ANOTHER - Respondents
Court: ‑‑ Arts. 61 & 115 ‑Breach of contract ‑ Compensation for‑Limita tion‑Terms of contract providing for reimbursement of payments made by respondent on account of terminal tax at actuals and appellant liable to reimburse payments thus made by respondent Refusal of appellant to pay amount, held, in breach of terms of contract and Art. 115 attracted to case and not Art. 61.V Contract Limitation.P L D 1961 (W
THE PAKISTAN TEXTILE MILLOWNERS' ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF KARACHI AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1964 (W
PAKISTAN TOBACCO Co., LTD.‑Petitioner Versus KARACHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1967 Karachi 854
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF WEST PAKISTAN‑‑Plaintiff Versus KARACHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANOTHER‑Defendants
Court: High CourtP L D 1975 Karachi 26
MESSRS JAMIA INDUSTRIES LTD., KARACHI-Plaintiff Versus KARACHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN-Defendant
Court: