Lease and Lessor
Lease and Lessor legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Expression "doranay muddat" used in agreement between parties, held, would be pragmatic and invokable during subsistence of lease
Such expression would have no application where duration of lease had already expired
Expression "baad alkazai muddat" viz. expiring of term, used in agreement, wherein a lease-holder had undertaken to deliver vacant possession would not create vested right in such lease-holder to retain possession thereof and lessor would be entitled to get vacant possession of such property.
"Lease and Lessor", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22232
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Lease and Lessor"
1986 M L D 2788
Dr. MUHAMMAD ANWAR CHAUDHRY‑‑Petitioner Versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, SARGODHA‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore1985 C L C 1675
NAMATULLAH KHAN-Petitioner Versus 1st SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND RENT CONTROLLER and 2 others-Respondents
Court: Karachi2005 P Cr
KAMRAN KHAN — Petitioner Versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION MODEL TOWN GUJRANWALA and 2 others — Respondents
Court: LahoreBefore Zia Mahmood Mirza, J
WEST PUNJAB TEXTILE MILLS LTD.‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, through Member,
Court:1963 P T D 364
Before Lahiri, C. J. and G. K. Mitter, J Sri GANESH PROPERTIES LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, WEST BENGAL
Court: Calcutta India1998 P T D (Trib
N/A
Court: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan2003 C L D 776
HABIB BANK LIMITED — Petitioner Versus DOMESTIC APPLIANCES (PVT.) LTD. and another — Respondents ORIX LEASING PAKISTAN LIMITED — Applicant
Court: Karachi2001 C L C 1025
Dr. Mrs. NASREEN‑‑‑Appellant Versus PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1980 Supreme Court 298
MUHAMMAD YOUSUF-Appellant Versus ABDULLAH-Respondent
Court: - S. 74-Breach of contract-Compensation - Lessee depositing a certain sum with lessor by way of security and agreeing for confiscation of such amount in case of lessee's failure to pay rent for consecutive three months-No damage alleged to have been caused to demised premises at time of expiry of lease-Provision for compensation, held, hit by S. 74, Contract Act, 1872 and lessee's deposit liable to be adjusted against rent due from him-West Pakistan Urban Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI of 1959), S. 13.-Compensation.P
MOOR MUHAMMAD, WALI MUHAMMAD‑Appellants Versus DHIRA SINGH-JAGAT SINGH and others‑Respondents
Court: