Home Maxims & Terms Collusive Decree meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Collusive Decree

Collusive Decree legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1962 PLD 1 BAGHDAD-UL-JADID Judicial Precedent

Collusive Decree - Pre-emption suit by S against MM suffering a compromise decree being passed against him in G's suit for pre-emption-Evidence showing M avoiding service in S's suit-G's suit instituted much later and, decree passed within a fortnight-Possession of property sot proved to have been passed to G in terms of G's decree-Entries in khasra girdawari doubtful

G's decree against M held to be "for benefit of M "and ineffective in S's suit.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Collusive Decree", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22245

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Collusive Decree"

CLC 1979
Civil Appeal No. 20 of 1978, decided on 8th September, 1979.

1979 C L C 882

GUL AHMED KHAN-Appellant Versus NAZAKAT HUSSAIN SHAH Ate 6 onus-Respondents

Court: S C (A J & K)
CLC 1992
R.O.R. No.1086 of 1989, decided on 19th August, 1991.

1992 C L C 1609

GHULAM ABBAS and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MANSUB DAD and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Board of Revenue, Punjab
CLC 1987
Judicial Miscellaneous Application No. 17 and Civil Miscellaneous Application Nos. 1952, 1953, 2322, 2303 and 2304 of 1986, decided on 23rd September, 1986.

1987 C L C 484

LAL MUHAMMAD BROW‑‑Applicant Versus IQBAL AHMAD and another‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
CLC 1988
Civil Miscellaneous No. 3436‑C of 1985 in F.A.0. No. 127 of 1977, decided on 23rd November. 1987.

1988 C L C 2037

SARDAR BAKHSH‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. SAHIB KHATOON‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
SCMR 1987
Civil Appeal No. 8/K of 1986, decided on 25th January,1987.

1987 S C M R 1589

Mst. FATIMA‑‑Appellant Versus AHMAD KHAN ANSARI and another‑‑Respondents

Court: High Court
YLR 2010
Suit No.1466 of 2000, decided on 24th September, 2009.

2010 Y L R 763

ZOHRA BEGUM — Plaintiff Versus SAJIDA BEGUM — Defendant

Court: Karachi
SCMR 1986
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 229 of 1985, decided on 11th October, 1986.

1986 S C M R 1957

ALLAH YAR KHAN — Petitioner Versus Mst. SARDAR BIBI and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1982
Criminal Revision No. 249 of 1961; decided on 28th April, 1982.

P L D 1982 Peshawar 172

ABDUR RAUF AND OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus ABDUR RAHIM KHAN, ADVOCATE‑Respondent

Court: ---S. 12(2) as added by Civil Procedure Code (Amendment) Ordinance (X of 1980)‑Words and phrases‑‑Word "person" in S. 12(2)--Connotation‑fiction 12(2) contains word "person" and not ` judg ment‑debtor" or "his successor‑in‑interest" or word "party to suit " Law‑maker if really intended to restrict right of filing application under S. 12(2) to judgment‑debtor or his successor‑in‑interest or a person party thereto, nothing prevented law‑maker to have said so Interpretation of statutes‑Import into a provision of law something not mentioned therein‑Not permissible.‑Words and phrases‑Inter pretation of statutes.
PTD 1998
M.C.C. No.69 of 1989, decided on 8th February, 1996.

1998 P T D 460

Sm. KUSUMBAI JAIN Versus COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX

Court: 221 ITR 152
MLD 2007
2006-October-4

2007 M L D 1558

AHMAD SHER and 10 others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD HAYAT and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore