Stevedore
Stevedore legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Meaning.
"Stevedore", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22273
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Stevedore"
1991 P L C 846
Messrs A.R. KHAN & SONS (PVT.) LTD. and 22 others Versus THE REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, KARACHI and 2 others
Court: Karachi High Court2013 P T D (Trib
FAUJI OIL TERMINAL AND DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LTD., KARACHI Versus COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (APPEALS-I), LARGE TAXPAYER'S UNIT, KARACHI
Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal of Pakistan1976 P L C 638
KARACHI STEVEDORING Co. LTD. Versus Vth SIND LABOUR COURT AND OTHERS
Court: KarachiP L D 1976 Karachi 79
KAZI & KAZI LTD. — ‑Petitioners Versus FIFTH SIND LABOUR COURT, KARACHI AND 3 OTHERS- Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1976 Karachi 1091
KARACHI STEVEDORING CO. .LTD.‑Petitioner Versus VTH SIND LABOUR COURT AND OTHERS‑Respondent
Court:1983 P L C 483
A. R. KHAN & SONS LTD. Versus RICE EXPORT CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN'
Court: Karachi High Court2001 Y L R 304
KARACHI STEVEDORES CONFERENCE LTD. — Plaintiff Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and 2 others — Defendants
Court: KarachiP L D 1977 Karachi 361
KARACHI DOCK LABOUR BOARD‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF SIND AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: S. 3 read with S. 2(a), (b) & (c) and Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act (IX of 1974)‑Words "employer", "establishment", "worker"‑Expression "monthly wages" used in definition of "worker"‑Connotation‑Employee whether paid on daily, weekly, monthly or other basis‑Deemed to be "worker" for purposes of Ordinance (XI of 1972)‑Dock workers governed by Act IX of 1974 Held, not workers for purposes of Ordinance XI of 1972.‑Words and phrases.P L D 1978 Karachi 1041
MESSRS GENERAL CARRIERS LTD., KARACHI AND 2 others‑ — Plaintiffs Versus KARACHI PORT TRUST‑Defendant
Court: .‑‑ Ss. 17 & 18‑Licence of stevedoring wrongly terminated‑No suit for specific performance of contract or for injunction would lie in view of provisions of Ss. 21 & 56, Specific Relief Act (I of 1887).‑Specific performance.2010 C L C 1810
A.R. KHAN & SONS (PVT.) LTD through Authorized Officer and 3 others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, Islamabad and 3 others — Respondents
Court: Karachi