Home Maxims & Terms Maritime meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Maritime

Maritime legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2013 CLD 362 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Ss. 3(2)(c), 3(2)(q), 3(5)(c), 4(2), 4(3) & 6Maritime claimLimitation

Suit under Admiralty jurisdiction of High Court was filed by bank against vessel and its owners, seeking recovery of outstanding dues and claims from defendants

High Court directed to arrest the vessel and detain it till all outstanding dues and claims were recovered

Plea raised by defendants was that suit was barred by limitation

Validity

Claim of maritime lienee was superior than those of a mortgagee, as latter's claim was always subject to satisfaction of maritime lien and that mortgage could not be equated with maritime lien

Maritime lien and mortgage were distinct and unrelated right having altogether different privileges, rights and liabilities of maritime lienee and mortgagee

Single Judge of High Court was right in holding that claim of bank in suit based on mortgage was not that of maritime lien and as such was not hit by S.6 of Admiralty Jurisdiction of High Courts Ordinance, 1980

Claim of bank in suit was a claim in rem against defendant vessel under Ss.3(2)(c), 3(2)(q), 3(5)(c), 4(2) and 4(3) of Admiralty Jurisdiction of High Courts Ordinance, 1980, and suit was maintainable under S.6 of Admiralty Jurisdiction of High Courts Ordinance, 1980, as well as under the principle of lex fori

Claim/charge of bank as mortgagee of vessel was not that of a maritime lien as the charge of bank/mortgagee had arisen solely by virtue of mortgage agreement, whereas charge of maritime lienee was to arise by operation of law

Suit filed by bank was not barred by limitation as S.6 of Admiralty Jurisdiction of High Courts Ordinance, 1980, was only applicable to "maritime lien" and "or any other maritime lien" as specifically provided therein and not to "mortgage", "charge" or "claim", which were not specifically provided therein

Division Bench of High Court in exercise of appellate jurisdiction declined to interfere in the order passed by Single Judge of High Court

Appeal was dismissed in circumstances.

2001 YLR 319 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Maritime"Detention" (as appearing in maritime laws)

Defined.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Maritime", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22279

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Maritime"

PLD 1991
Civil Appeal No.123‑K of 1981, decided on 24th April, 1991.

P L D 1991 Supreme Court 1021

HONG LEONG FINANCE LIMITED ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus m.v. ASIAN QUEEN through Nazir High Court ‑‑‑ Respondent

Court:
CLD 2013
2012-July-30

2013 C L D 362

F.T. SELNES — Appellant Versus MEGA INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL BANK and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
CLC 1989
Admiralty Suit No.374 of 1985, decided on 22nd June, 1989.

1989 C L C 2168

ABDUS SAMAD KHAN‑‑Plaintiff Versus m.v. AL‑AIDA and 2 others‑‑Defendants

Court: Karachi
PLD 1978
Admiralty Suit No. 25 and Order on C. M. A. No, 84 of 1978, decided on 22nd June 1978.

P L D 1978 Karachi 837

CONTRACTORS‑Plaintiff Versus M. v. LUCTOR‑I (M. v. UNION BRENDA) AND 5 OTHERS‑ - Defendants

Court: ‑‑ S. 4‑Expression "maritime lien"‑Signifies a claim attaching to res from moment obligation arises and travelling with res into whosesoever possession it may come‑Maritime lien continues binding on ship until discharged and charge of ownership immaterial.‑Words and phrases.
CLD 2004
Admiralty Appeals Nos.24 and 125 of 2002, decided on 7‑1‑2003.

2004 C L D 286

Messrs ABDOUN OIL COMPANY S.A. INCORPORATED UNDER LAWS OF THE REPUBLIC OF PANAMA, IN GREECE, WITH THEIR OFFICE AT 43‑45 PORTMAN SQUARE, London‑‑‑Appellant Versus "M/T ABDOUN DISCOVERY" A SHIP FLYING PANAMA FLAG PRESENTLY AT THE PORT OF PORT QASIM AUTHORITY, KARACHI, PAKISTAN and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 1997
Admiralty Suit No. 1120 and Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 1778 of 1996 decided on 26th November, 1996.

P L D 1997 Karachi 216

KARACHI‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus m. v. JUSTICE and 3 others‑Defendants

Court:
PLD 1994
Admiralty Suit No.2 of 1987, decided on 9th December, 1993.

P L D 1994 Quetta 51

SEMCO SALVAGE PTE. LTD ;Plaintiff Versus M.V. KAPTAN YUSUF KALKAVAN through

Court:
MLD 1995
Admiralty Appeal No.1 of 1993, decided on 1st December, 1994.

1995 M L D 706

SEMCO SALVAGE PTE LIMITED‑‑‑‑Appellant Versus m.v. KAPTAN YUSUF KALKAVAN TURKISH and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Quetta
PLD 1985
Admiralty Suits Nos. 2 to 4 of 1984, decided on 17th August, 1985.

P L D 1985 Quetta 278

AZHAR AHMAD KHAN AND OTHERS-Plaintiffs Versus M. v. ASHAR AND 3 OTHERS-Defendants

Court: -- S. 2(k) -"Ship"-Definition -Non-navigable vessel-Dismantling of 2/3rd of a vessel, held, would render same as non-navigable--Delisting of a vessel from Registry of country of which, it flies the flag, would not alter character of vessel and would not render same in practical terms "non-navigable".-Words and phrases.
PLD 1993
Civil Appeal No.167‑K of 1989, decided on 9th December, i991

P L D 1993 Supreme Court 88

ATLANTIC STEAMER'S SUPPLY COMPANY ‑Appellant Versus m.v. TITISEE and others ‑‑‑ Respondents

Court: ‑‑"Maritime lien"‑‑‑Definition ‑‑‑ Maritime lien means legal proceedings in an appropriate form to have the ship seized by the officers of the Court and made available by sale if not released on bail ‑‑‑ Proceedings so initiated are called action in rem against res‑‑‑Word "res" in the legal parlance in context of an admiralty action connotes a limited number of things such as ships and their cargoes and freights.‑‑Words and phrases.