Alluvion and Diluvion
Alluvion and Diluvion legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Alluvion and Diluvion -Principle applicable to land acquired by accretion and land reformed after submersion in river or sea, as derived from various enactments-Abatement of rents etc. during submersion period not significant-Regulation (XI of 1825), S. 4(4), (5)-Bengal Tenancy Act (VIII of 1885), S. 86-A old and new-East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 (XXVIII of 1951), Ss. 86, 86-A & 87.
"Alluvion and Diluvion", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22288
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Alluvion and Diluvion"
P L D 1969 Dacca 40
ABDUR RAHMAN GAZI‑Petitioner Versus Q. M. RAHMAN, MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, EAST PAKISTAN AND OTHERS Respondents
Court:P L D 1966 (W
Haji NEK MUHAMMAD‑Appellant Versus PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN AND 12 OTHERS — Respondents
Court:P L D 1960 Supreme Court (Pak
SURENDRA LAL DFPAL-Appellant Versus SATYA TAMAJ GHOSHAL and others-Respondents
Court:P L D 1963 Dacca 1033
MUHAMMAD USMAN GHANI — ‑Petitioner Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, FARIDPUR AND ANOTHER
Court:2002 Y L R 1637
MUHAMMAD ANWAR and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus QADIR BAKHSH and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1962 Dacca 41
ABDUL JABBAR‑Appellant Versus BENI MADHAB GUPTA AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1968 Karachi 52
ALI KHAN AND OTHERS‑Appellants Versus (1) SOOMAR AND OTHERS
Court: (a) Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S. 42 ‑ Declaratory suit‑(Darya khurdi right)‑Claim to a "legal character"‑Suit by heirs of original owner of eroded land claiming that as such heirs they are entitled to ijazatnama which. Government grants by annual lease by way of compensation ‑ Held: plaintiff's were suing to establish a "legal character" and thus the declaratory suit under S. 42 was competent‑Nek Muhammad v. The Province of West Pakistan P L D 1966 Kar. 314 distinguished.1987 C L C 1902
Miss RIFAAT HAMID GHANI and another‑‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD SHAMSUL JALIL and 2 others‑‑Respondents
Court: KarachiP L D 1966 Supreme Court 559
Present: A. R. Cornelius, C. J., S. A. Rahman, Fazle‑Akbar, B. Z. Kaikaus and Hamoodur Rahman, JJ Versus IMTIAZ NAZIR AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: (b) Interpretation of statutes‑Legislative authority proceeding to legislate in an erroneous construction of previous legislation Such erroneous construction does not alter previous legislation Cape Brandy Syndicate v. Inland Revenue Commissioners 1921 2 K B 403 ref..P L D 1956 (W
BASHIR AHMAD and 5 others‑Plaintiffs‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD and 8 others‑Defendants‑Respondents
Court: (a) West Punjab Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Appli cation Act (IX of 1948) as amended by Punjab Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application (Amendment) Act (XI of 1951), S. 2‑Effect‑Declaratory suits under custom competent (per majority, Kaikaus J, contra)‑Act not retrospective‑Estate of male owner under custom, nature of ‑Punjab Laws Act (IV of 1872), Ss. 5, 7‑Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Ss. 18 and 42‑Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), S. 43.