Home Maxims & Terms Business meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Business

Business legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2019 CLD 326 COMPETITION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN Judicial Precedent
Ss. 4(1) & 4(2)(a)Market economyBusinessPrincipleIn a market economy, businesses are free to set their prices and discount their goods and services as they deem fit

Business undertakings must set their prices and all other terms of doing business independently of their competitors and trade associations if any.

1973 PTD 495 SUPREME-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Income-tax-Business-Purchase and sale of shares Profits whether of capital or revenue nature.Held, that the transactions were stamped with the character of commercial transactions and the profit realised by the appellant firm by the sale of the shares was Income liable to income-tax.

1973 PTD 78 SUPREME-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Business.-Share dealing-Bonus shares-Valuation. In the case of a dealer in shares who values his stock at cost, where bonus shares issued in respect of ordinary shares hold by him rank pari passu with the original shares, the correct method of valuing the cost to the dealer of the bonus shares is to take the cost of the original shares, spread it over the original shares and the bonus shares collectively and find out the average price or` all the shares.

1973 PTD 121 MADRAS-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Income-tax-Business - Several businesses carried on-One business stopped-Expenditure- in respect of stopped business Whether can be set off against income from other businesses Whether distinction between individual assessee and firm-Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 10(1).

1972 PTD 181 SUPREME-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Income-tax

Business-Dealer in shares or investor-Mixed question of fact and law-Reference- Question whether there was material-Reframed-Scope of jurisdiction of High Court on a reference-Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 66.

1972 PTD 77 MADRAS-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Income-tax

Business - Lease and business – Difference Assessee who owned powerlooms permitting R to carry on business of manufacturing handloom cloth under agreement-Fixed sum payable monthly to assessee as his share in net profits-Agreement, whether lease-Income, whether assessable as income from business or as "income from other sources"-Indian Income-tax Act. 1922. Ss. 10 & 12.

1969 PTD 704 BOMBAY-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Business Business-Money-lending -Properties acquired in lieu of debt-Profit from sale of property-Whether business income-Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 10.

1969 PTD 280 BOMBAY-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business

Selling agent-Appointment of sub-agents and brokers for carrying out sale transactions-Sales Agent whether carries on business activities-Commission whether business income Partnership of selling agent-Whether entitled to registration Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, Ss. 10 & 26-A.

1969 PTD 245 BOMBAY-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business

Company formed by film distributors for constructing vaults for storing and preserving films and providing other amenities to film industry-Income of company, whether' income from house property or business income-Tests-Income-tax Act, 1422, Ss. 9 & 10.

1969 PTD 167 BOMBAY-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business

Will-Trustees-Power to invest and 'vary investments-Sale of shares-Whether trustees dealers in shires-Sale within three years of purchase-Beneficiary dealer in shares-Effect.

1969 PTD 71 BOMBAY-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business

Cloth dealers-Committee formed for temporary period to take quotas and distribute goods Profit derived from transaction-Whether taxable Profit to be held in trust for benefit of dealers-Effect-Whether assessable under S. 41 Association-Dissolution-Notice issued and assessment made after dissolution-Validity-Reference-Additional legal argument on point raised before and considered by Tribunal-Income-tax Act, 1922, Ss. 10, 41, 44 & 66.

1968 PTD 807 CALCUTTA-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business BusinessAdventure in the nature of trade-Profits from sale of land - Whether assessable as business income - Guiding principles

Income-tax Act, 1922, Ss. 2(4) do 10.

1968 PTD 758 CALCUTTA-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Business Business-Isolated transactions

Property-owning company acquiring foreign exchange and selling for profit-Profit whether exempt or assessable as business income-"Adventure in the nature of trade"-Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 2(4).

1968 PTD 611 BOMBAY-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Exemption-Business - Assessment of employer - Part of remuneration of employee disallowed under section 10(2) (xv)

Exemption in assessment of employee - Finance Department Notification No. 878-F of March 21, 1922-Income-tax Act (XI of 1922), Ss. 10(2)(xv) & 60.

1965 PTD 811 SUPREME-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Business Business-Adventure in the nature of trade-Purchase of land with jute press and warehouses thereon-Press not run by assessee

Sale-Transaction whether adventure in the nature of trade-Profit whether assessable to tax-Mixed question of law and fact-Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, Ss. 2(4) & 10-[Janki Ram Bahadur Ram v. Commissioner of Income-tax (1963) 50 I T R 350 reversed.]

1965 PTD 615 SUPREME-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Income-tax-General principles-Approbate and reprobated

Business-Malaya-Enemy occupation-Payment of debts in depreciated currency-Ordinance scaling down payments and reviving debts in part-Additional amounts received under Ordinance-Whether income-Additional amounts paid-Whether business expenditure

Apportionment between capital and interest.

1965 PTD 580 SUPREME-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Business Business-Computation of profits-Purchase and sale of properties in different currencies-Conversion to common standard to arrive at real profit-Whether permissible.

1965 PTD 515 SUPREME-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Business Business - Computation of profits - Deductions-Whether expenditure or allowance must be necessarily capable of producing taxable income-Banking business - Investment in securities including tax-free securities-Interest on money borrowed-Extent of allowance-Indian Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 10 (2) (iii), (xv)[Commissioner of Income-tax v. N. S. A. R. Concern (1938) 6 I T R 194 dissented from].

1961 PTD 1018 PATNA-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Investment company-Dealing in shares-Bonus shares-Valuation.

1961 PTD 949 MADRAS-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
S. 25 (3), (4) - Business­Discontinuance-Succession-Business charged under 1918 Act

­Exemption from tax-Business in respect to which tax was not assessed for some intermediate years-Earlier succession before 1939-Effect. A family consisting of three brothers, G, I and S, carried on business in timber and was assessed to income-tax in the status of an association of persons. In 1920, on behalf of the family, G entered into a partnership with A to carry on the business of contracts. The family was to finance the business and, in addition to interest on the capital brought in by it, it was entitled to a third share of profits. A died in 1927, and his widow and legal repre­sentatives relinquished their rights in the business and thereafter the family continued tire business in contracts.

1961 PTD 426 MADRAS-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Stock-in-trade valuation-Principle whether applies to valuation of stock on hand at dissolution-Partnership

­Dissolution-One partner taking over stock on hand-Basis of valuation of stock. The privilege of valuing the opening and closing stocks in a consistent manner is available only to a continuing business and it cannot be adopted where a business has come to an end and the stock on hand has to be disposed of in order to determine the exact position of the business on the date of the closure. Where a partnership, which has been valuing its opening and closing stocks at cost price when its business was continuing, dis­solves and one of the partners takes over the stock on hand, in order to arrive at the correct picture of the trading results of the partnership on the date when it ceases to function, the valuation of the stock on hand should be made on the basis of the prevailing market price. Therefore, that the partner who takes over the stock on hand values them at cost price is of no effect.

1961 PTD 409 DHAKA-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 25 (4)-Applicability­

Business-Succession-Relief admissible where business " as a whole" is transferred or succeeded. In order that a person should be held to have succeeded another person in carrying on a business, profession or vocation, it is necessary that the person succeeding should have succeeded his predecessor in carrying on the business as a whole. Where a business is split up, and thereafter another person carries on a part of the business, he cannot `succeed' his predecessor in carrying on the business.

1961 PTD 723 ALLAHABAD-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Dealing in shares-Shares transferred out of stock­-in-trade to investment account-Bonus shares received in respect of shares in investment account as well as stock-in-trade of business ­Profit realised by sale of original and bonus shares out of investment account-Whether income-Amount realised by sale of bonus shares received as part of stock-in-trade-Whether income­ Reference-High Court

Appellate Tribunal giving separate reasons-Orders of Income-tax Officer and Appellate Assistant Commissioner not made part of case-Jurisdiction of Court to refer to such orders-Income-tax proceedings-Principle of res­judicata. The assessee, a Hindu undivided family carrying on money­ lending business on a small scale and also the business of dealing in shares, transferred on the last day of the accounting period relevant to the assessment year 1943-44 curtain shares out of its stock-in-trade to an account styled investment account, so that. these shares would remain as investments for the family apart from the stock-in-trade of its business. The shares transferred to the investment account included 975 Kanpur Textiles ordinary and 500 such shares still remained as part of its stock-in-trade. In the proceedings for the assessment year 1943-44 the Income ­tax Officer accepted the transfer and valuing the shares trans­ferred to the investment account at market price brought to tax excess of the market price over the cost price, adding a remark that "in future no profit or loss will be taken on the investment shares."

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Business", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22300

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Business"

PTD 1960
Income‑tax Reference No. 42 of 1958, decided on 16th and 17th June 1959.

1960 P T D 106

MANILAL DAHYABHAI Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, BOMBAY CITY

Court: Bombay (India)
PTD 1981
Tax Reference No. 220 of 1971, decided on. 29th March, 1981.

1981 PTD 129

Rais GHAZI MUHAMMAD KHAN Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, LAHORE

Court: Lahore High Court
PTD 1997
I.T.A. No. 107/KB of 1987-88, decided on 19th August, 1993

1997 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 1999
I. T. R. C. No. 160 of 1994, decided on 11th December, 1996.

1999 P T D 449

KARNATAKA LIGHT METAL INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: 225 I T R 947
PLD 1978
Civil Reference Case No. 17 of 1969, decided on 22nd March 1978.

P L D 1978 Karachi 765

PHEROZEALI‑Applicant Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX (WEST), KARACHI — Respondent

Court:
PLD 1963
Civil Reference No. 137 of 1960, decided on 21st January 1963.

P L D 1963 (W

Seth ISMAIL JAMAL BUDHANI-Applicant Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, KARACHI — Respondent

Court:
PTD 1963
Civil Reference No. 137 of 1960, decided on 2ist January 1963.

1963 P T D 413

Seth ISMAIL JAMAL BUDHANI‑Applicant Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, KARACHI‑ Respondent

Court: Karachi Pakistan
PTD 2000
Civil Writ Petition No. 1378 of 1982, decided on 10th January, 1997.

2000 P T D 1525

KISHAN CHAND Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX and another

Court: 234 I T R 808
PTD 1988
W.T.As. Nos. 84/KB and 85/KB of 1982-83, decided on '4th September, 1988.

1988 P T D (Trib

N/A

Court: Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal Pakistan
PTD 1997
Civil Appeals Nos.7660 to 7662 of 1996, decided on 26th April, 1996.

1997 P T D 264

VEECUMSEES Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX

Court: 220 ITR 185