Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › He who seeks enquity must do equity meaning in Urdu
Maxim Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

He who seeks enquity must do equity

He who seeks enquity must do equity legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1969 PLD 306 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

S. 65 and Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S. 41 read with Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Ss. 83 & 84 - Mortgage - Minor - Misrepresentation - Minor entering into mortgage fraudulently representing as to his age and subsequently bringing action for restitution of mortgaged property-Restitution of property to be ordered-Minor must, however, be made to refund consideration-Maxim : He who seeks equity must do equity.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "He who seeks enquity must do equity", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22309

Precedents & Case Laws citing "He who seeks enquity must do equity"

CLC 1984
Civil Miscellaneous Applications Nos. 1650 and 1688 of 1976 in Suit No. 206 of 1976, decided on 21st April, 1976.

1984 C L C 440

ADAMJEE PAPER AND BOARD MILLS LTD.‑‑Petitioner Versus MARITIME AGENCIES LTD.‑Respondent

Court: Karachi
PLD 1977
R. S. A. No. 59 of 1970, decided on 26th May 1977.

P L D 1977 Peshawar 74

SHAISTA GUL AND 9 OTHERS‑Appellants Versus QAZA KHAN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑ S. 12‑Pre‑emptiorr‑Exchange mutation a sham transaction and really part and parcel of same transaction given colour of mortgage by an earlier mutation‑Decree for possession by pre‑emption awarded in circumstances.‑Pre‑emption.
PTD 1981
It does appear to us that this was a case decided on the principle of promissory estoppel. The representative of the Arun District Council clearly gave assurance to Crabb that they would give him access to the new road at point B to serve the southern portion of his land and the Arun District Council in fact constructed a gate at point B, and in the belief induced by this representation that he would have the right of access to the new road at point B, Crabb agreed to sell the northern portion of his land without reserving for himself as owner of the southern portion any right of way over the northern portion for the purpose of access to the new road. This was the reason why the Court raised an equity in favour of Crabb and held that the equity would be satisfied by giving Crabb "the right of access at point B free of charge without paying anything for it". . Arun District Council was held bound by its promise to provide Crabb access to the new road at point B and this promise was enforced against Arun District Council at the instance of Crabb. The ease was one which fell within the category of promissory estoppel and it may be regarded as supporting the view that promissory estoppel can be the basis of a cause of action. It is possible that the case also came within the rule of proprietary estoppel enunciated by Lord Kings-down in Ramsden v. Dyson 1866 L R 1 H L Cas. 129 (H L):

1981 P T D 277

MOTILAL PADAMPAT SUGAR MILLS Co. LTD. Versus STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS

Court: Supreme Court of India
PLD 1954
Civil Appeal No. 3 of 1951, decided on 21st December 1953,

P L D 1954 Federal Court 35

2. R. B. MOHAN SINGH OBEROI Versus R. B. JODHA MAL KOTHALIA‑Respondent

Court: Case‑law referred to.

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library