Improvements

If a prosecution witness makes dishonest improvement in his statement regarding material aspects of the case or he makes dishonest improvement in his statement to bring his evidence in line with medical evidence, such witness is not worthy of reliance.

Witness who made material improvements during trial, his testimony would remain of no worth for prosecution.

Improvement once found to be deliberate and dishonest causes serious doubts on veracity of witnesses.

Improvements and discrepancies in evidence of prosecution witnesses are material in nature and the same are enough proof for disbelieving and discrediting their evidence

Witnesses may not inspire confidence and if their evidence is found to be in conflict and contradictory with other evidence or with statements already recorded, in such a case, it cannot be held that prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.

Improvements made by a witness at the trial found to be deliberate and dishonest, cast serious doubt on his veracity and render his statement unreliable.

Improvements made by witnesses in their statements at the trial once found to be deliberate and dishonest cast serious doubt on their veracity making their testimony unreliable.

Party enjoying land belonging to his co-sharer without making any payment to anybody-Not entitled to compensation for improvements.