Home Maxims & Terms Illegal meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Illegal

Illegal legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2002 PLD 369 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases Illegal"

Meanings.

2002 PLD 152 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
"Unlawful" and "illegal "

Distinction

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Illegal", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22325

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Illegal"

PLD 2008
2008-April-29

P L D 2008 Karachi 369

JALAL and 11 others — Applicants Versus KAPRI KHAN and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 2009
23rd - December, 2008

2009 P Cr

MUHAMMAD RIAZ AHMED KHAN — Applicant Versus IMRAN ABDULLAH and 5 others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 2007
2006-November-14

P L D 2007 Supreme Court 423

RAHIM TAHIR — Petitioner Versus AHMED JAN and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Appellate Jurisdiction
PCRLJN 2022
Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 173 of 2014, decided on 20th August, 2018.

2022 P Cr

NIAZ MOHAMMAD (DECEASED) through LRs. — Applicant Versus UMER KHAYAM and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
YLR 2007
Election Petition No.120 of 2002, decided on 15th January, 2007.

2007 Y L R 1830

ZULFIQAR ALI BEHAN — Petitioner Versus Dr. ABDUL GHAFFAR JATOI and others — Respondents

Court: Election Tribunal Sindh
PCRLJ 2010
2009-December-2

2010 P Cr

MUHAMMAD BAKHSH — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
SCMR 2016
Criminal Appeal No. 04-K of 2012, decided on 22nd July, 2016.

2016 S C M R 1931

Shaikh MUHAMMAD NASEEM — Appellant Versus Mst. FARIDA GUL — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2016
Decided on 20th July, 2016.

2016 S C M R 1637

MIRZA — Appellant Versus PATEL — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of UK
MLD 2010
2010-June-18

2010 M L D 1920

MUHAMMAD ALI — Applicant Versus ABDUL HAQ and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 2013
the basis of its own merits and the evidence advanced by both sides and accused would have full opportunity to adduce their version in defence---Circumstances of the present case did deserve cursory disposal of the matter and there was no bar on the aggrieved person from availing remedy against the offender under any other law as well as under the Illegal Dispossession Act, 2005, as subsection 2(3) was clear in such respect, so pendency of civil suit inter se the parties created no embargo for proceedings under the special law---Revision was dismissed

P L D 2013 Islamabad 121

ZAFAR MEHMOOD KHOKHAR and others — Petitioners Versus Dr. MUHAMMAD AFZAL — Respondent

Court: High Court