Register
Home › Maxims & Terms › Allegans contraria non est audiendus meaning in Urdu
Maxim Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Allegans contraria non est audiendus

Allegans contraria non est audiendus legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2002 MLD 749 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Allegans contraria non est audiendusAllegans contraria non est audiendus"Meaning and connotation

He who makes mutually contradictory and inconsistent statements is not to be listened to; his testimony deserves to be outrightly rejected.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Allegans contraria non est audiendus", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22329

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Allegans contraria non est audiendus"

CLD 2021
2020-December-7

2021 C L D 578

Mrs. FARNAZ AHMED through Special Attorney — Appellant Versus FAYSAL BANK LIMITED and others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
CLD 2023
N/A

2023 C L D 1342

SILVER STAR INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, LAHORE through Chief Executive — Appellant Versus Messrs KAMAL PIPES INDUSTRIES, LAHORE and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
YLR 2022
N/A

2022 Y L R 2354

EJAZ AHMED — Appellant Versus ABDUL HAMEED — Respondent

Court: Lahore (Bahawalpur Bench)
MLD 2022
2021-September-8

2022 M L D 1112

Mst. ANWAR MAI — Petitioner Versus GHULAM SARWAR and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
YLR 2023
2022-May-11

2023 Y L R 729

KHADIM HUSSAIN — Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAYYAH and 12 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
MLD 2002
Criminal Appeal No.21‑J and Criminal Revision No. 310 of 1999, heard on 27th February, 2001.

2002 M L D 749

BASHIR AHMAD‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
YLR 2020
Civil Revision No. 34-P of 2007, decided on 2nd December, 2019.

2020 Y L R 2645

Arbab MUHAMMAD KABIR KHAN and others — Petitioners Versus Arbab ABDUR REHMAN and others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar
PLD 1953
Appeal No. 525 of 1952, decided on 17th (24th) March 1953, from the order of M. A. Rahman, Additional Sessions Judge, Gujrat dated the 31st March 1952, acquitting the accused respondents.

P L D 1958 Lahore 271

THE CROWN‑Appellant Versus SULTAN MAHMOOD and others‑Accused‑Respondents

Court:
CLD 2007
2007-May-31

2007 C L D 1281

Shaikh ABDUL WAHID and 7 others — Appellants Versus COMMISSIONER (SMD & CLD) — Respondent

Court: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan
CLC 2025
the basis of preponderance of evidence---Courts are obligated to overall appreciate the evidence available on record---Report of local commission and a minor weakness in the petitioner's statement had been made basis by Courts below for rendering their findings---Neither report of the local commission, which was full of irregularities, nor weaknesses of the petitioner's case could be made basis of passing a decree in the suit for specific performance of contract instituted on the basis of an oral agreement to sell, which agreement was not concluded in presence of any independent witness and the record clearly depicted glaring contradictions in statements of PWs. qua the execution of said oral agreement---Concurrent findings of the courts below were result of grave misreading and non-reading of evidence and incorrect application of settled principles of law governing grant of decree in a suit for specific performance of oral agreement---Civil revision was allowed, in circumstances

2025 C L C 885

NASIR ALI — Petitioner Versus Mst. RAHEELA MAHDI — Respondent

Court: Lahore (Rawalpindi Bench)

Dictionary Search

Advertisement

Explore Legal Library

Pakistan Law Portal is an advanced digital repository of legal precedents, statutes, and judicial terms. Utilize citation search or keywords to discover relevant case law.

Back to Library