Home Maxims & Terms Legal Representatives meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Legal Representatives

Legal Representatives legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2015 SCMR 1341 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 50Decree, satisfaction ofLegal representativesExtend of liabilityPrinciple

Pecuniary obligation undertaken by deceased promisor would be binding on his legal representatives to the extent of estate of deceased promisor in their hand.

2015 CLD 1377 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 50Decree, satisfaction ofLegal representativesExtend of liabilityPrinciple

Pecuniary obligation undertaken by deceased promisor would be binding on his legal representatives to the extent of estate of deceased promisor in their hand.

2012 YLR 6 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
O.VIII, R. 13Legal representativesNon-filing of listEffectProvisions of O.VIII, R.13, C.P.C. are directory and not mandatory

No consequence or penalty is attached in not conforming with such provisions strictly.

1968 PTD 312 SUPREME-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent
Legal Representatives Legal representatives-Deceased partner of firm of solicitors

Share of subsequent realisation pertaining to work done before his death-Whether assessable as income in hands of legal representatives-Scope of S. 24-B-Income-tax Act, 1922, S. 24-B.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Legal Representatives", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/22368

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Legal Representatives"

PLD 1972
Civil Revision No. 597 of 1967, decided on 18th January 1972.

P L D 1972 Lahore 256

LAL HUSSAIN‑Petitioner Versus AMIR MUHAMMAD KHAN AND ANOTHER‑ Respondents

Court:
YLR 2012
Suit No.848 of 2006 and C.M.A. No.11056 of 2010, decided on 2nd June, 2011.

2012 Y L R 6

MUHAMMAD SAJID — Plaintiff Versus Mrs. ZAIB-UN-NISA — Defendant

Court: Sindh
PLD 1974
Civil Original No. 3/C of 1973, decided on 30th January 1974.

P L D 1974 Lahore 312

DR. ARSHAD MAHMOOD‑Plaintiff Versus DR. MUMTAZ HUSSAIN‑Defendant

Court: ‑‑ O. XXII, rr. 4 & 5 read with S. 2(11)‑Legal representative-- Means person in law representing 'estate of deceased or one who intermeddles with estate of deceased‑"Legal representative" not same as "next of kin"‑Person can be legal representative of deceased person only if he succeeds to his estate‑Defendant dying during pendency of suit‑Plaintiff seeking to implead brother of deceased .defendant .as his legal representative must show that deceased left behind estate to which his brother succeeded‑Question whether ,any person is or is not legal representative of deceased Cannot be postponed till the suit is disposed of and decree put into ;execution‑Girdharlal Krishnavalabh v. Bai Shiv (1884) 8 Bom. 309 and Motiram v. Daw Hnsn E and others A I R 1934 Rang. 196 dissented from.
PLD 1989
Civil Appeal No.24 of 1988, decided on 26th January, 1989.

P L D 1989 Azad J&K 28

MUHAMMAD NAZIR and 9 others‑‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD SADIQ and 7 others‑‑Respondents

Court:
PTD 1997
Civil Appeals Nos. 2542 to 2544 of 1977, decided on 13th March, 1996

1997 P T D 469

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX Versus JAI PRAKASH SINGH

Court: 219 ITR 737
PLD 1975
S. A. O. No. 16 of 1974, heard on 13th March 1975.

P L D 1975 Lahore 1195

RASHID AHMAD AND 8 OTHERS‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD ARSHAD‑Respondent

Court:
PTD 1994
Civil Writ No. 849 of 1972, decided on 21st October, 1992.

1994 P T D 457

VIJAY SARIN Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER

Court: 202 I T R 249
PLD 1960
Second Appeal from Order Case No. 10 of 1954, decided on 6th April 1960.

P L D 1960 (W

MIRZA KHAN AND OTHERS‑Plaintiff's‑Appellants Versus GANESH DASS AND OTHERS‑Defendants‑Respondents

Court:
PTD 1966
Writ Petition No. 437 of 1954, decided on 29th April 1957.

1966 P T D 713

E. ALFRED Versus FIRST ADDITIONAL INCOME-TAX OFFICER, SALEM

Court: Madras (India)
PLD 1988
Regular Second Appeal No.125 and Civil Revision No.900/D of 1984, decided on 12th January, 1988.

P L D 1988 Lahore 418

KHUSHI MUHAMMAD Appellant Versus REHMAT ALI Respondent

Court: ‑‑‑ O.XXII, R.11 & S.100‑‑Second appeal filed against dead person‑ Legal representatives not brought on record within period of limitation‑‑Effect‑‑Where appeal had been instituted against dead person, and his legal representatives were impleaded long after expiry of period of limitation, such appeal, held, deserved dismissal on ground of limitation.‑‑‑Limitation.