Home Maxims & Terms Any meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Any

Any legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2002 PTD 303 INCOME-TAX-APPELLATE-TRIBUNAL-PAKISTAN Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Any"Meanings

Word "any" has a diversity of meaning as may be employed to indicate "all' or "every" as well as "some" or "one" and its meaning in a given statute depends upon the context and subject-matter of the statute.

1999 MLD 721 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Any"

Meaning elaborated.

1995 PLD 282 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Words and Phrases Word "any" is ordinarily used to enlarge the amplitude of the term to which it is attached.

1994 PLD 525 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

-"Any" is susceptible and has meaning more than one.

1992 SCMR 563 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and PhrasesAny'

Connotation.

1989 PLC 790 LABOUR-APPELLANT-TRIBUNAL-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases

Word "hire" connotes compensation for the use of a thing or for labour or service.

1988 CLC 2475 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and PhrasesWord 'any'Meaning and scope of

Word 'any' being of widest amplitude would remove all limitations.

1988 PLD 8 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Word, "any", occurring in S. 4(3)(1) meaning, scope and connotation of

Word, "any" means "one or all", and "one or part" and does not mean the whole but can be a part also.

1986 PLD 237 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Words "Proceeding", "case", "order" and "any"-Connotation of - Word "proceeding", held, would have wider meaning than word "case"-Word "proceeding" could be given narrow or wide import depending upon nature and scope of enactment in which same was used, in particular context of language of enactment

Word "order" in general would be comprehensive enough to include all kinds of orders including formal orders Word, "any" excludes limitation and qualifications connotating wide generality.

1982 CLC 28 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 5-Words and phrases

Word "any" in S. 5-Held, cannot be equated with term "specific or particular" as Government has to cause eviction of lessee or unauthorised occupants from different categories of land.-[Words and phrases].

1972 PLD 880 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Word "any" - Connotes wide generality and excludes imitations or qualifications.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Any", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2246

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Any"

PLC(CS) 2016
Civil Appeal No.5 of 2004, decided on 2nd April, 2015.

2016 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD ASIF QURESHI Versus EHTESAB BUREAU through Chairman

Court: High Court (AJ&K)
MLD 2024
2024-August-30

2024 M L D 1937

Latif and others — Petitioners Versus Abdul Nabi and others — Respondents

Court: Balochistan
CLC 2019
2019-March-5

2019 C L C 2061

RAJA KHAN — Applicant Versus SHAH NAWAZ and 10 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh (Hyderabad Bench)
MLD 2022
2020-September-30

2022 M L D 132

SAGHEER AHMED — Appellant Versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary G.B. and 5 others — Respondents

Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court
PTD 2009
C.M.A. No.702-S of 2009 in Civil Suit No.1727 of 2008, decided on 18th May, 2009.

2009 P T D 1694

Mrs. KHALIDA AZHAR Versus VIQAR RUSTAM BAKHSHI and others

Court: Islamabad High Court
PCRLJ 2015
2013-December-4

2015 P Cr

MUNSHI AFZAL and others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD SHOAIB, INVESTIGATION OFFICER NAB RAWALPINDI and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1988
Criminal Appeal No. 280/C of 1981, decided on 16th February, 1988.

1988 P Cr

ABDUL ALEEM — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent

Court: Lahore
PCRLJ 1980
Writ Petition No. 3212 of 1979, decided on 21st July, 1979.

1980 P Cr

ALLAH BAKHSH‑Petitioner Versus THE SUMMARY MILITARY. COURTS Nos. 36/37; LAHORE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1960
Writ Petition No. 561 of 1958, decided on 22nd December 1959.

P L D 1960 (W

MUHAMMAD YAMIN‑Petitioner Versus (1) PAKISTAN, THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN

Court:
PLD 1963
21st May 1963

P L D 1963 (W

G. N. DALMIA‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent

Court: High Court