Any
Any legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Word "any" has a diversity of meaning as may be employed to indicate "all' or "every" as well as "some" or "one" and its meaning in a given statute depends upon the context and subject-matter of the statute.
Meaning elaborated.
Words and Phrases Word "any" is ordinarily used to enlarge the amplitude of the term to which it is attached.
-"Any" is susceptible and has meaning more than one.
Connotation.
Word "hire" connotes compensation for the use of a thing or for labour or service.
Word 'any' being of widest amplitude would remove all limitations.
Word, "any" means "one or all", and "one or part" and does not mean the whole but can be a part also.
Words "Proceeding", "case", "order" and "any"-Connotation of - Word "proceeding", held, would have wider meaning than word "case"-Word "proceeding" could be given narrow or wide import depending upon nature and scope of enactment in which same was used, in particular context of language of enactment
Word "order" in general would be comprehensive enough to include all kinds of orders including formal orders Word, "any" excludes limitation and qualifications connotating wide generality.
Word "any" in S. 5-Held, cannot be equated with term "specific or particular" as Government has to cause eviction of lessee or unauthorised occupants from different categories of land.-[Words and phrases].
Word "any" - Connotes wide generality and excludes imitations or qualifications.
"Any", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2246
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Any"
2016 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD ASIF QURESHI Versus EHTESAB BUREAU through Chairman
Court: High Court (AJ&K)2024 M L D 1937
Latif and others — Petitioners Versus Abdul Nabi and others — Respondents
Court: Balochistan2019 C L C 2061
RAJA KHAN — Applicant Versus SHAH NAWAZ and 10 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh (Hyderabad Bench)2022 M L D 132
SAGHEER AHMED — Appellant Versus PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT through Chief Secretary G.B. and 5 others — Respondents
Court: Gilgit-Baltistan Chief Court2009 P T D 1694
Mrs. KHALIDA AZHAR Versus VIQAR RUSTAM BAKHSHI and others
Court: Islamabad High Court2015 P Cr
MUNSHI AFZAL and others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD SHOAIB, INVESTIGATION OFFICER NAB RAWALPINDI and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore1988 P Cr
ABDUL ALEEM — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore1980 P Cr
ALLAH BAKHSH‑Petitioner Versus THE SUMMARY MILITARY. COURTS Nos. 36/37; LAHORE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1960 (W
MUHAMMAD YAMIN‑Petitioner Versus (1) PAKISTAN, THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Court:P L D 1963 (W
G. N. DALMIA‑Petitioner Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: High Court