Legal Precept
Legal Precept legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Falsehood leaves its terms.
"Legal Precept", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/23746
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Legal Precept"
2002 P L C (C
ADMINISTRATOR, DISTRICT COUNCIL, LARKANA and another Versus GHULAB KHAN and 5 others
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2001 P L C (C
ADMINISTRATOR, DISTRICT COUNCIL, LARKANA and another Versus GHULAB KHAN and 5 others
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2001 S C M R 1320
Present: Rana Bhagwan Das and Javed Iqbal, JJ Versus GHULAB KHAN and 5 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 2002 Supreme Court 491
MUHAMMAD ANWAR KHAN and 5 others — Petitioners Versus Chaudhry RIAZ AHMAD and 5 others — Respondents
Court: High Court2002 C L C 1527
SHER AZAM‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PRINCE AMIN COLONY through
Court: Peshawar1995 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD ASLAM Versus PUNJAB PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION and others
Court: Lahore High Court2008 P L C (C
SADAQAT ALI Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Chief Secretary and 3 others
Court: Lahore High Court1997 P L C (C
Dr. KHALID HAMEED Versus CHAIRMAN, PUNJAB PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, LAHORE and 3 others
Court: Lahore High CourtP L D 1993 Lahore 673
Miss SOBIA HADI‑‑Petitioner Versus THE PRINCIPAL, K.E. MEDICAL COLLEGE CHAIRMAN,
Court: .... Prospectus for Admission in Punjab Medical Colleges for the year 1992, R.12(f) ‑‑‑ Admission in first year class of M.B.B.S. ‑‑‑Last date for submission of Admission Forms was 25‑10‑1992 ‑‑‑ Petitioners' result of F.Sc., having been declared on 31‑10‑1992, they applied after the last date for submission of Forms had expired ‑‑‑ Petitioners, thus, could not get admission and their forms were not entertained‑Validity ‑‑‑ Right of candidate for admission and his/her merit has to be determined on the date when final selection was to be made‑‑ Final selection of candidates having We . n made and finalized on 3‑11‑1992, i.e. after 31‑10‑1992 (when petitioners' result was declared), petitioners could not be denied admission on the ground that result card was not produced on or before 25‑10‑1992 ‑‑‑ Publication of result and issuance of result card was not within the control of petitioners but within the domain of Educational Authorities ‑‑‑ Petitioners were, thus, entitled to the benefit of maxim "Lex non cogit ad impossibilia" law does not compel a man to do that which he cannot possibly perform ‑‑‑ Plea of respondents treating petitioners as ineligible for admission on the basis of R. 12(f) of the Prospectus for Admission in Medical Colleges thus, could not prevail ‑‑‑ Petitioners had obtained marks higher than the merit list and consequently were entitled to admission in one of the Medical Colleges ... Respondents were directed to admit petitioners without disturbing any other candidates already' permitted admission.‑‑Maxim.2013 P T D (Trib
MUHAMMAD NAEEM QURESHI Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, COLLECTORATE and another
Court: Customs Appellate Tribunal Bench-III, Karachi