Home Maxims & Terms Takeover Bid meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Takeover Bid

Takeover Bid legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2003 CLD 463 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Takeover bid "

Meaning.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Takeover Bid", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/23756

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Takeover Bid"

PTD 2019
Constitution Petitions Nos.D-5410, D-5267, D-5268 and D-7015 of 2018, decided on 26th January, 2019.

2019 P T D 1308

Messrs GLOBAL TRADE LINK and others Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Revenue Division Ministry of Finance and others

Court: Sindh High Court
CLD 2003
Suit No.347 of 2002, decided on 22nd August, 2002.

2003 C L D 463

ADAMJEE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED and 3 others‑‑‑Plaintiffs Versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED, ISLAMABAD and 5 others‑‑‑Defendants

Court: Karachi
PLD 1988
Civil Original No. 34 of 1986, decided on 7th October, 1987.

P L D 1988 Lahore 1

SHAHBAZUD DIN CHAUDHRY and 27 others‑ ‑Petitioners Versus Messrs SERVICES INDUSTRIES TEXTILES LIMITED and 4 other s‑‑ Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑ Promoter of a company‑‑Word promoted not defined‑‑ Fact as to whether a person was promoter of a Company has to be established by producing evidence like any other question of fact‑Mere fact that a person made available foreign exchange for importing the machinery by itself was not sufficient for holding that such person was the person who brought into existence the venture and took various steps thereafter and thus brought about the incorporation of the Company. ‑‑Words and phrases.
CLD 2013
2012-October-17

2013 C L D 1122

Before Mohammed Asif Arif, Commissioner (Insurance) and Imtiaz Haider, Commissioner (SMD) MAHBOOB ELAHI, CHIEF EXECUTIVE and 3 others — Appellants Versus COMMISSIONER (CLD), SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN — Respondent

Court: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan
CLD 2010
2009-April-15

2010 C L D 262

Syed YAWAR ALI and others — Appellants Versus COMMISSIONER, SECURITIES MARKET DIVISION, SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN — Respondent

Court: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan
SCMR 2002
N/A

2002 SCMR 653

Messrs S.S. ENTERPRISES, KARACHI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary,

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
CLD 2025
2025-June-20

2025 C L D 1814

MUHAMMAD ZIAULLAH KHAN CHISHTI through attorney — Applicant Versus TRG PAKISTAN LIMITED and others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
CLD 2005
the assumption that whatever is stated in the plaint is true, therefore, the defects that. may be made a ground of decision. by the Court must float: on the surface of plaint or the plaintiffs case as presented to the Court---Where the plaintiffs, for dearth of their own record, had relied on the documents attached with the written statement filed by the defendant, High Court examined the plaint and documents filed therewith and also the documents attached with the written statement in order to comprehend the case of the plaintff s and also to assess the defects alleged therein

2005 C L D 1852

Mian FAROOQ AHMED SHEIKH and 8 others — Plaintiffs Versus PRIVATIZATION COMMISSION through Chairman and 3 others — Defendants

Court: Lahore
SCMR 2005
Civil Petitions Nos.2437 and 2438 of 2002, decided on 24th March, 2004.

2005 S C M R 318

ADAMJEE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LIMITED and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2018
Decided on 20th December, 2017.

2018 S C M R 605

DELOITTE & TOUCHE (NOW CONTINUED AS DELOITTEE LLP) — Appellant Versus LIVENT INC., through its Special Receiver and Manager Roman Doroniuk and another — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court of Canada