Collusion
Collusion legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Element of fraud is inbuilt in the expression "collusion". Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edn., Wharton's Law Lexicon, 14th Edn. and Zafarullah and 3 others v. Civil Judge, Hafizabad and 3 others PLD 1984 Lah. 396 ref.
In judicial proceedings expression "collusion" means a secret arrangement between two parties that one should institute a suit against the other in order to obtain decision of Judicial Tribunal for some sinister purpose.
Respondent complained of a secret compact between parties to declaratory suit for an evil and fraudulent purpose Declaratory suit was alleged to be kind of an artifice employed by parties to that suit to deceive respondent-"Collusion" pleaded by respondent was "fraud" inasmuch as it was not an innocuous agreement in other words was a deceitful agreement for an evil purpose Held, though respondent had not used word "fraud" in plaint, yet by making averments contained therein he had pleaded fraud- respondent, therefore, could assail declaratory decree passed in favour of petitioner by making application under S. 12(2), C. P. C. in circumstances.
S. 12(2) [as added by Civil Procedure Code (Amendment) Ordinance (X of 1980)]-Words and phrases-Word "collusion" in judicial proceedings-Means secret agreement between two persons to have a suit instituted by one against other in order to obtain decision of a judicial tribunal for some sinister purpose.-[Words and phrases].
S. 12(2) [as added by Civil Procedure Code (Amendment) Ordinance (X of 1980)]-Words and phrases
Word "person" in S. 12(2)
Connotation-fiction 12(2) contains word "person" and not ` judgment-debtor" or "his successor-in-interest" or word "party to suit "Law-maker if really intended to restrict right of filing application under S. 12(2) to judgment-debtor or his successor-in-interest or a person party thereto, nothing prevented law-maker to have said so Interpretation of statutes-Import into a provision of law something not mentioned therein-Not permissible.-[Words and phrases-Interpretation of statutes].
"Collusion", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2393
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Collusion"
P L D 1984 Lahore 396
ZAFARULLAH AND 3 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus CIVIL JUDGE, HAFIZABAD AND 3 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1976 Karachi 565
MRS. PAMELA AMBROSE MARTIN‑Petitioner Versus AMBROSE FRANK ANTHONY MARTIN‑Respondent
Court:2026 M L D 898
Sardar Muhammad Boota — Appellant Versus Jaffar Ali (deceased) through LRs and others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2005 Supreme Court (AJ&K) 1
NAZAR AHMED and 8 others — Appellants Versus FAZAL HUSSAIN and 11 others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2003 Supreme Court 818
FAZAL KARIM through Legal Heirs and others — Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL through Legal Heirs and others — Respondents
Court: High Court1988 C L C 2341
MUHAMMAD YAQOOB‑‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD YAQOOB ARIF and another‑‑Respondents
Court: Azad J&K2001 C L C 1166
ABDUL KHALIQ through Legal Heirs and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR KHAN through Legal Heirs and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1988 Lahore 402
RAB NAWAZ and 2 others‑‑Appellants Versus SHAHNAWAZ KHAN and 4 others‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑Para. 25‑‑Right of pre‑emption claimed on basis of being tenant of land sold‑ ‑Determination of possession as tenant‑‑ Crop in land was sown before sale of such land‑‑ No evidence produced to show that said crop was sown by tenants pre‑ emptors or that same was sown by them as tenants of vendor‑‑ Entries in revenue record at the time of inspection showed that crop in land was sown before sale was effected‑‑ Girdawari, had presumption tar as same related to the date of inspection but would not carry presumption that crop in such land was sown by the person who was in possession of land al the time of inspection‑‑ Tenants pre‑emptors failed to produce any evidence, oral or documentary to show that they were in possession of such land at the time of sale or at the time of sowing of crop‑‑ Such pre‑emptors were not proved to, be tenants Of land at the time of sale.‑‑ Presumption.1988 C L C 2037
SARDAR BAKHSH‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. SAHIB KHATOON‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore1909 Y L R 524
MUNAWAR KHAN and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus NASEER AHMAD and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore