Home Maxims & Terms Collusion meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Collusion

Collusion legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2000 CLC 623 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases "Collusion"Definition

Element of fraud is inbuilt in the expression "collusion". Black's Law Dictionary, Fifth Edn., Wharton's Law Lexicon, 14th Edn. and Zafarullah and 3 others v. Civil Judge, Hafizabad and 3 others PLD 1984 Lah. 396 ref.

2000 MLD 1459 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Collusion"Meaning

In judicial proceedings expression "collusion" means a secret arrangement between two parties that one should institute a suit against the other in order to obtain decision of Judicial Tribunal for some sinister purpose.

1984 PLD 396 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 12 (2)-Allegation of "collusion" and plea of misrepresentation advanced by respondent

Respondent complained of a secret compact between parties to declaratory suit for an evil and fraudulent purpose Declaratory suit was alleged to be kind of an artifice employed by parties to that suit to deceive respondent-"Collusion" pleaded by respondent was "fraud" inasmuch as it was not an innocuous agreement in other words was a deceitful agreement for an evil purpose Held, though respondent had not used word "fraud" in plaint, yet by making averments contained therein he had pleaded fraud- respondent, therefore, could assail declaratory decree passed in favour of petitioner by making application under S. 12(2), C. P. C. in circumstances.

1982 PLD 172 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

S. 12(2) [as added by Civil Procedure Code (Amendment) Ordinance (X of 1980)]-Words and phrases-Word "collusion" in judicial proceedings-Means secret agreement between two persons to have a suit instituted by one against other in order to obtain decision of a judicial tribunal for some sinister purpose.-[Words and phrases].

S. 12(2) [as added by Civil Procedure Code (Amendment) Ordinance (X of 1980)]-Words and phrases

Word "person" in S. 12(2)

Connotation-fiction 12(2) contains word "person" and not ` judgment-debtor" or "his successor-in-interest" or word "party to suit "Law-maker if really intended to restrict right of filing application under S. 12(2) to judgment-debtor or his successor-in-interest or a person party thereto, nothing prevented law-maker to have said so Interpretation of statutes-Import into a provision of law something not mentioned therein-Not permissible.-[Words and phrases-Interpretation of statutes].

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Collusion", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2393

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Collusion"

PLD 1984
Writ Petition No. 4177 of 1982, decided on 21st April, 1984.

P L D 1984 Lahore 396

ZAFARULLAH AND 3 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus CIVIL JUDGE, HAFIZABAD AND 3 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1976
M. A. No. 24 of 1975, decided on 27th November 1975.

P L D 1976 Karachi 565

MRS. PAMELA AMBROSE MARTIN‑Petitioner Versus AMBROSE FRANK ANTHONY MARTIN‑Respondent

Court:
MLD 2026
2024-November-28

2026 M L D 898

Sardar Muhammad Boota — Appellant Versus Jaffar Ali (deceased) through LRs and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2005
2004-December-3

P L D 2005 Supreme Court (AJ&K) 1

NAZAR AHMED and 8 others — Appellants Versus FAZAL HUSSAIN and 11 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 2003
2003-May-26

P L D 2003 Supreme Court 818

FAZAL KARIM through Legal Heirs and others — Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD AFZAL through Legal Heirs and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 1988
Civil Appeal No.13 of 1988, decided on 15th June, 1988.

1988 C L C 2341

MUHAMMAD YAQOOB‑‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD YAQOOB ARIF and another‑‑Respondents

Court: Azad J&K
CLC 2001
Regular Second Appeal No. 1010 of 1979, heard on 4th December, 2000.

2001 C L C 1166

ABDUL KHALIQ through Legal Heirs and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR KHAN through Legal Heirs and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1988
Regular First Appeal No.226 of 1984, decided on 28th March, 1988.

P L D 1988 Lahore 402

RAB NAWAZ and 2 others‑‑Appellants Versus SHAHNAWAZ KHAN and 4 others‑‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑Para. 25‑‑Right of pre‑emption claimed on basis of being tenant of land sold‑ ‑Determination of possession as tenant‑‑ Crop in land was sown before sale of such land‑‑ No evidence produced to show that said crop was sown by tenants pre‑ emptors or that same was sown by them as tenants of vendor‑‑ Entries in revenue record at the time of inspection showed that crop in land was sown before sale was effected‑‑ Girdawari, had presumption tar as same related to the date of inspection but would not carry presumption that crop in such land was sown by the person who was in possession of land al the time of inspection‑‑ Tenants pre‑emptors failed to produce any evidence, oral or documentary to show that they were in possession of such land at the time of sale or at the time of sowing of crop‑‑ Such pre‑emptors were not proved to, be tenants Of land at the time of sale.‑‑ Presumption.
CLC 1988
Civil Miscellaneous No. 3436‑C of 1985 in F.A.0. No. 127 of 1977, decided on 23rd November. 1987.

1988 C L C 2037

SARDAR BAKHSH‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. SAHIB KHATOON‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
YLR 1999
Civil Revision No.2373‑D of 1985, decided on 6th April, 1999.

1909 Y L R 524

MUNAWAR KHAN and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus NASEER AHMAD and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore