Home Maxims & Terms Consent meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Consent

Consent legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2025 PLD 662 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 496-BConstitution of Pakistan, Arts. 9 & 14FornicationPre-conditionsConsentProofRight to life, dignity and privacy

Essential ingredient of fornication is establishment by way of evidence of the fact that it was a willful intercourse between the parties

It is essential that for the purposes of fornication consent be established

Consent means an unequivocal voluntary agreement with the woman by words, gestures or any form of verbal or non-verbal communication, which communicates her willingness to participate in the sexual act

Consent goes to the very root of right to dignity under Article 9 of the Constitution because in a case of rape where she states that there is no consent then to impute consent, that too without evidence of the same, undermines dignity and right to privacy of a woman

Without any evidence on the fact of consent or willingness, offence of fornication cannot be made out

Consent has to be established and it cannot be assumed.

2022 PLD 328 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 29Judicial proceedingsConsentScope

Consent of the Advocate General required under S. 29 of the Mental Health Ordinance, 2001, is a substantive function in order to ensure that the objectives of the Ordinance are achieved

Legislature in its wisdom has created a first level of inquiry through the Advocate General's office to ensure that the application as well as the fact that prima facie there is a case to be placed before the Court of Protection

Such heightened protection is given to protect a person who cannot coherently protect his or her rights or property.

2018 MLD 268 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
ScopeConsent decree or order has in it the element of both a command and a contract

Obligation to act upon such order/decree becomes indispensible legally and morally.

2017 CLD 280 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Essential ingredient of a "contract"Consent

Basic ingredient of a contract/agreement was consent, which could not be imposed on a party.

1992 CLC 1966 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent

Consent Factum of consent could be proved by oral evidence.

1990 PLD 173 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

How and in what circumstances consent order was passed by the Court is a question of fact.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Consent", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2437

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Consent"

SCMR 1982
Civil Appeal No. 69 of 1978 in Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 72-R of 1978 decided on 16th March, 1981.

1982 S C M R 741

RIAZ AND OTHERS — Petitioners Versus RAZI MUHAMMAD-Respondent

Court: -----S. 13 read with Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), S. 3-Consent Definition--Definition of "consent" or free-consent in Contract Act, 1872 applies to provisions of Specific Relief Act under residuary clause of S. 3 of Specific Relief Act.-Words and phrases.
PCRLJ 2016
2016-May-30

2016 P Cr

IMRAN — Applicant Versus The STATE — Respondent

Court: Sindh
PLD 1954
Appeal Side No. 50 of 1952‑53, decided on 13th March 1954 from District Montgomery.

P L D (Rev

SARDAR BEGUM‑Petitioner Versus NISHAT AFZA and another‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1950
Regular Second Appeal No. 605 of 1946, decided on 15th January 1948, from the order of the 'Additional District Judge, Lahore.

P

MOHAMMAD IBRAHIM-Appellant Versus SHAH MOHAMMAD and others-Respondents

Court:
MLD 2018
N/A

2018K2515

N/A

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 1973
Criminal Revision No. 71 of 1972 decided on 19th February 1973.

1973 P Cr

Sh. RAFIQUE AHMED -Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD FAROOQ AND OTHERS — Respondents

Court: Supreme Court (A J & K)
SCMR 1981
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 1045 of 1975, decided on 13th June, 1981.

1981 S C M R 969

MUHAMMAD SADIQ alias MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ-Petitioner Versus MEMBER (CONSOLIDATION), BOARD OF REVENUE

Court: High Court
PLC 2018
Labour Appeal No.4 of 2017, decided on 22nd August, 2017.

2018 P L C 239

Messrs BALOCHISTAN WHEELS LTD. HUB DISTRICT LASBELLA Versus ABDUL WAHID

Court: Balochistan Labour Appellate Tribunal
PLD 2003
2003-February-4

P L D 2003 Karachi 303

MUBARAK ALI and others — Applicants Versus ALI MUHAMMAD and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PCRLJ 2025
26.06.2024, per Ayesha A. Malik, J.), State of Punjab v. Gurmit Singh and others (AIR 1996 SC 1393)

2025 P Cr

Zain Tariq — Petitioner Versus The State and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore