Home Maxims & Terms Ordinarily meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Ordinarily

Ordinarily legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2003 YLR 1075 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
OrdinarilyApplicability

Where doing of an act is bound by time but is qualified by the term "ordinarily" it necessarily implies that such provision of law is intended to be directory only.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Ordinarily", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/24479

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Ordinarily"

PTD 1980
Reference Case No. 9 of 1965, decided on 2nd February 1966.

1980 P T D 205

MUJIBUR RAHMAN, PROP. SHAMIM & Co., DACCA Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA

Court: Dhaka High Court
PTD 2001
Tax Cases Nos. 1085 to .1088 of 1990 (References Nos.541 to 544 of 1990), decided on 17th February, 2000.

2001 P T D 1374

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX Versus A. M. MEYYAMMAL

Court: 244 I T R 758
MLD 2009
basis of evidence placed on record

2009 M L D 1274

Malik GUL RAIZ AWAN — Petitioner Versus Mst. ASMA GUL RAIZ and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1970
Civil Appeal No. 41 of 1970, decided on 9th March 1970.

P L D 1970 Supreme Court 273

MUHAMMAD NOOR‑Appellant Versus THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PESHAWAR‑‑-Respondent

Court:
CLC 1992
Constitutional Petition No. 177 of 1991, decided on 24th September, 1991

1992 C L C 104

Mst. NAZ BIBI‑‑‑‑Petitioner Versus KHUDA BUKHSH and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Quetta
PTD 1991
N/A

1991 P T D 783

THE COMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX Versus Messrs RIZKI INK COMPANY LIMITED

Court: Karachi High Court
PTD 2000
Tax Case No.530 of 1991 (Reference No.223 of 1991), decided on 22nd June,1998.

2000 P T D 1948

V. E. PERIANNAN Versus COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX

Court: 240 I T R 723
YLR 2011
Writ Petition No. 11798 of 2010, decided on 2nd November, 2010.

2011 Y L R 1025

GHULAM HUSSAIN and 3 others — Petitioners Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, MULTAN and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PTD 1969
Income tax Referred Cases Nos. 15 and 16 of 1960, decided on 1st March 1962.

1969 P T D 508

A. T. PARTHASARATHIAH & BROS. AND ANOTHER Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, MYSORE

Court: Mysore (India)
PLD 1977
Constitutional Petition No. 331 of 1975, decided on 14th April 1977.

P L D 1977 Karachi 733

ISHTIAQ AHMAD‑Petitioner Versus SECOND ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, SUKKUR AND 2 OTHERS‑‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑‑‑ R. 6‑Suit for dower and maintenance‑‑‑Forum of‑Wife, after leaving husband's house residing with her parents at S for about three years before and on date of filing of suit ‑Held, can be considered to be "ordinarily resident of S and Court at S had jurisdiction in matter.‑jurisdiction.