Coram Non Judice
Coram Non Judice legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Obligatory duty of a Judge/Court was to apply correct law to a lis and it was not upon litigant to point out which law that was appliable
Primary duty of Court was to do justice and to apply correct law to facts of a case and same was exclusively the duty of the Judge/Court
To perpetuate an error was no virtue but to correct the same was compulsion of judicial conscience and legal maxim "coram non judice" indicated a proceeding which was outside authority of a Judge or without legal jurisdiction.
Whenever court was not properly constituted, proceedings carried out by it were nothing but coram-non-judice.
Coram non judice is a legal term typically used to indicate a legal proceeding that is outside presence of a judge, with improper venue or without jurisdiction
Any indictment or sentence passed by a court which has no authority to try an accused of that offence is violation of law and would be coram non judice and a nullity
Jurisdiction cannot be conferred by consent nor can it be fettered unless there is a choice between more than one place in terms of jurisdiction
If order or judgment is suffering from vice of coram non judice it may be quashed and set aside by a court when a special statute gives a right and also provides for a forum for adjudication of rights.
Definition.
'Coram non judice' was a fatal flaw germane to the very constitution of the judicial forum rendering its proceedings non est in the eye of law
Forum may be vested with the jurisdiction yet its actions may be invalid, if such forum had been set up in clear and absolute violation of the law applicable in such behalf.
Member of a religiously motivated terrorist organization, attacking Armed Forces with deadly weapons, causing death of Army personnel
Conviction and sentence awarded by Field General Court Martial (FGCM)
Coram non judice
Scope
Accused persons never contended that FGCM was not duly convened and constituted in terms of the Pakistan Army Act, 1952
No illegality or infirmity, in such behalf, was pointed out or noticed
In the circumstances, the conviction and sentence of accused persons could not be said to be coram non judice.
Any determination made and decision given by a court or other forum performing judicial functions (or even quasi-judicial functions) having no jurisdiction was a nullity in the eyes of law.
At the time of the Preliminary Determination made by the National Tariff Commission, term of office of one of its Members had lapsed therefore, the constitution of the Commission was defective and irregular
Legality of the Commission's constitution was pivotal to the exercise of its jurisdiction
No provision in the National Tariff Commission Act, 1990 existed that protected the decisions or determinations of the Commission in case the constitution of the Commission was irregular or defective
Preliminary determination made by the Commission in the present case had not been issued by the Commission as mandated under S.37 of the Anti-Dumping Duties Ordinance, 2000, therefore the same was set aside being coram non judice
Constitutional petition was allowed accordingly.
At the time of the Preliminary Determination made by the National Tariff Commission, term of office of one of its Members had lapsed therefore, the constitution of the Commission was defective and irregular
Legality of the Commission's constitution was pivotal to the exercise of its jurisdiction
No provision in the National Tariff Commission Act, 1990 existed that protected the decisions or determinations of the Commission in case the constitution of the Commission was irregular or defective
Preliminary Determination made by the Commission in the present case had not been issued by the Commission as mandated under S.37 of the Anti-Dumping Duties Ordinance, 2000, therefore the same was set aside being coram non judice
Constitutional petition was allowed accordingly.
Plaint was to be returned for presentation to the proper court.
Legislative authority for ratifying the acts, omissions and orders which are "corain non judice", has no limitation/restriction.
"Coram Non Judice", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2477
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Coram Non Judice"
1991 M L D 2364
MUHAMMAD KHAN — Petitioner Versus THE STATE and others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 1973 Supreme Court 614
DR. IJAZ HASSAN QURESHI AND 2 OTHERS‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court:P L D 2006 Supreme Court (AJ&K) 5
MUHAMMAD RIAZ and 8 others — Petitioners Versus PERVAIZ MEHANDI and 72 others — Respondents/Pro forma Respondents
Court: High Court2020 Y L R 578
MUHAMMAD YOUSAF and others — Petitioners Versus TRUSTEES OF THE PORT OF KARACHI through Estate Manager and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh2005 S C M R 558
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Cabinet Secretariat, Establishment Division, Islamabad and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus ISRAR‑UL‑HAQUE and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1994 P Cr
Mst. NEELAM MAWAZ — Petitionei Versus THE STATE — Respondent,
Court: Lahore2007 S C M R 1126
Hafiz MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE ANWAR — Appellant Versus FAISALABAD DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY and others — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2002 P L C (C
AZHER JAMEEL Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others
Court: Karachi High CourtP L D 1988 Supreme Court 35
Sheikh ABDUL HAMEED and 2 others‑Petitioner Versus WA PDA‑‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑‑S.17(1‑A)‑‑West Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Employees (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1978‑‑Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Ss. 4 & 6‑‑Service Tribunal's powers to confirm, set aside, vary or modify orders impugned before it including powers of varying the order of removal and converting same into one of retirement‑‑Every case of irregularity committed by an employee must not be followed by a departmental inquiry under the WAPDA Employees Efficiency and Discipline Rules, 1978 and action under S.17(1‑A) is permissible even without such inquiry‑‑Such an action under S. 17 (1‑A) of the Act is permissible even where departmental inquiry had been started and only ground on which such an order could be challenged was of mala fide and coram non judice. p. 36 A