Home Maxims & Terms Creditor and Debtor meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Creditor and Debtor

Creditor and Debtor legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2021 SCMR 1617 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
CreditorsPreferenceStatutory First Charge, principle ofScope

Statutory First Charge ('SFC') was created by the operation of a provision in a legislation that granted preference to the holder of the SFC over all other creditors, including secured creditors, holding any form of security

Such SFC's derived their authority through the statute which was the precise reason why the court could not interfere in granting secured creditors rights over parties holding SFC's

Furthermore it was inconsequential if the (statutory) first charge was created prior or subsequent to the mortgage or lien of the secured creditor; it was also immaterial if the nature in the goods were changed

Statutory First Charge persevered as it attached itself onto the goods, travelled with them, and remained enforceable in a preferential manner against other secured creditors irrespective of the manner in which the goods were processed, sold, or pledged

Therefore, the SFC remained unfazed by whatever processing the goods underwent; it took precedence over all contractual liens and mortgages that may be claimed and its creation remained independent from the requirement of registration.

2021 SCMR 1617 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Statutory First Charge, principle ofFactors that could be considered by the court when considering the existence of a Statutory First Charge

When considering whether a statutory due carried with it a statutory first charge, the court could take into account the object and purpose of the legislation, the language of the provision conferring the statutory due, whether a statutory right was created through the operation of the act, and whether a priority was granted for the statutory due over other creditors

Each of said considerations served as indicative factors that the legislature intended to create a statutory first charge

However said factors were a non-exhaustive list of factors and each statutory due must be assessed subjectively.

2010 YLR 2549 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Debtor must seek the creditor.

1997 PLD 3 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Ss. 9, 10 & 11Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185(3)Benami transactionCreditor and debtorLiability of debtorExtent

Father and son both were advanced loan by Cooperative Society separately against separate and independent securities/sureties

Cooperative Society secured decree against respondent (father) to the extent of his own loan as also to the extent of loan advanced to his son

Validity

Order of Assistant Registrar, Cooperative Society who had decreed Cooperative Society's loan as also loan of respondent's son had not indicated in his order that loan advanced to son of respondent was "benami loan" and that real beneficiary and recipient of loan was respondent

In absence of finding of competent forum that real beneficiary of loan advanced to son of respondent was respondent, latter could not be deemed to be liable for loan advanced to his son.

1996 PLD 633 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Creditor and Debtor Debtor must follow his creditor to pay the debt.

1994 CLC 2284 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Creditor and Debtor Relationship ofDefendant's witness admitting in cross-examination about the factum of loan advanced by plaintiff to defendant

Plaintiff's claim of having advanced loan to defendant also got support from the written statement of one of the defendants who admitted all averments in the plaint

Relationship of creditor and debtor' was thus, established, between plaintiff and defendant on basis of evidence on record.

1992 MLD 1041 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Creditor and DebtorRelationship

Promissory note, letter of continuity, letter of lien etc. all bearing signatures of defendant remaining unrebutted with regard to contents contained therein

Relationship of creditor and debtor between parties was proved in circumstances

1991 MLD 1232 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Creditor and Debtor

In absence of any contract to the contrary, debtor would be bound to seek creditor to make payment to him where he resides or carries on business for gain.

1986 PLD 107 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Where no overt act was alleged against creditor, debtor, held, would be bound by terms of agreement.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Creditor and Debtor", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2494

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Creditor and Debtor"

PLD 2016
2015-December-21

P L D 2016 Sindh 332

Insolvency Petition No. Nil of 2014

Court: High Court
PLD 1976
R. S. A. No. 8 of 1972, decided on 1st July 1976.

P L D 1976 Quetta 99

Syed MAHBOOB ALI NAQVI-Defendant-Appellant Versus AUSTRALASIA BANK LTD., QUETTA-Plaintiff-Respondent

Court: S. 7-Banks, business of -Words "Open account!-- Meaning.-Words and phrases
PTD 1965
Civil Appeals Nos. 55, 888 and 889 of 1962 and 518 to 520, 722, 724, 725, 727 to 729 and 732 to 735 of 1963, decided on 26th October 1964.

1965 P T D 615

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS Versus V. MR. P. FIRM, MUAR AND OTHERS

Court: Supreme Court India
MLD 2000
Writ Petition No.3678 of 1999, decided on 24th August, 1999.

2000 M L D 292

ANJUMAN COOPERATIVE SOCIETY through Riaz Ahmed ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus DEPUTY REGISTRAR,COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, BAHAWALPUR and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 1992
Suit No. 80 of 1975, decided on 16th May, 1991

1992 M L D 1041

UNITED BANK LIMITED‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus A. KARIM JAFFARANI through Legal Heirs‑‑‑Defendants

Court: Karachi
MLD 1999
1997-August-12

1999 M L D 2609

INVESTMENT CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (I.C.P.) — Petitioner Versus Messrs SINDH TECH. INDUSTRIES LIMITED. — Respondent

Court: Karachi
CLC 1994
Suit No. 1056 of 1990, decided on 21st March, 1993.

1994 C L C 2284

GULAB‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus COAST LINES and others‑‑‑Defendants

Court: Karachi
CLC 1989
Regular Second Appeal No.329 of 1982, decided on 3rd June, 1989.

1989 C L C 2441

Mirza ANWAR AHMAD‑‑Appellant Versus HABIB BANK LTD., FAISALABAD and others‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
MLD 1986
Suit No.740 of 1985, Civil Miscellaneous Application Nos. 4199 of 1984, 4201, 4506, 4202 of 1985 and 67 of 1986, decided on 7th May 1986.

1986 M L D 1262

HABIB BANK LIMITED‑‑Plaintiff Versus SHAHSONS FISHERIES LIMITED and 4 others Defendants

Court: Karachi
CLD 2002
Regular First Appeal No.32 of 1985, heard on 19th June, 2001.

2002 C L D 1539

UNITED BANK LIMITED‑‑‑Appellant Versus Ch. AMJAD MAQSOOD and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore