Delegated powers
Delegated powers legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
"Due process of law"-Definition, meaning and application of doctrine, illustrated with reference to case-law.
"Delegated powers", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2544
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Delegated powers"
P D 1995 Lahore 187
Dr. QAMBAR MURTAZA BOKHARI‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mst. ZAINAB BASHIR‑‑‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1965 Supreme Court 261
JALAL DIN AND OTHERS‑Appellants Versus (1) Sheikh MUHAMMAD RAFIQ, SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, WITH POWERS OF CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, SARGODHA DIVISION, AT 3‑MONTGOMERY ROAD, LAHORE,
Court: (a) Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act (XXVIII of 1958), S. 31(2) read with S. 2(4), proviso 1‑Divisibility of house Power of Chief Settlement Commissioner‑Proviso 1 gives only a power of pronouncing a house divisible ‑ Exercise by Deputy Settlement Commissioner of powers, delegated under S. 31(2) by Chief Settlement Commissioner, to order division of house‑Not subject to appeal or revision‑Words "subject to the provisions of this Act and the rules made thereunder" occurring in S. 31(2) relate only to power to delegate and not to exercise of power delegated and so do not imply that exercise of delegated power is subject also to provisions of Act relating to appeal and revision‑Abdul Ghani v. Chief Settlement Commissioner P L D 1964 Lah. 214 overruled.1989 P L C 942
HABIB BANK LTD. and 2 others Versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAN
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab1986 M L D 422
PROVINCE OF PUNJAB — Petitioner Versus ASGHAR ALI and others — Respondents
Court: KarachiP L D 1952 Baluchistan 49
JAN MUHAMMAD‑Petitioner Versus CROWN‑Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 1964 (W
ABDUL GHANI‑Petitioner Versus THE CHIEF SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION COMMISSIONER PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER Respondents
Court: Held, that orders made by the Assistant Settlement Commis sioners, Deputy Settlement Commissioners, Additional Settlement Commissioners and Settlement Commissioners in exercise of the powers delegated to them by the Chief Settlement Commissioner section 31 (2) are as much subject to his general superintendence and control under section 9 of the Act arid open to scrutiny in an appeal or revision under sections 19 and 20 of the Act as the orders made by them in exercise; of their normal functions, under the Act.P L D 1965 Dacca 274
GUL NEWAZ KHAN‑Appellant Versus Mst. MAHERUNNESSA BEGUM‑Respondent
Court:1982 C L C 1459
Ghazi ABDUL YAWAR‑Petitioner Versus CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, RAWALPINDI,
Court: LahoreP L D 1966 (W
HUMAYUN KHAN AND 0THERS‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court:2025 C L C 750
CM PAK LIMITED through Company Secretary — Appellant Versus The PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION AUTHORITY — Respondent
Court: Islamabad