Home Maxims & Terms Domicile meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Domicile

Domicile legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2026 PLC(CS) 150 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Establishment Division Office Manual, 1971, O. M. No. 1/14/71-TRV dated 20-09-1971DomicileFemale civil servantPrinciple

Exception to general principle under O.M. 1971, whereby domicile of a civil servant stands frozen upon entering civil service, has been carved out in the case of female officers who marry during service

Recognizing constitutional values of equality, dignity and realities of social mobility that accompany marital life, a limited concession is provided whereby a woman officer may, only once, adopt domicile of her husband if she seeks appointment to a post through direct recruitment

Such exception acknowledges that marriage often entails a change in residence and social identity and aims to accommodate such transitions without violating broader principle of domicile integrity

Such option is strictly a one-time concession in the entire service tenure of female officer

Once exercised, the new domicile (based on husband's domicile) stands frozen and remains immutable regardless of whether the officer is subsequently divorced, widowed, or remarries a person from another province

Such safeguard ensures that the exception does not evolve into an instrument of circumvention or manipulation and preserves the constitutional scheme of fair and equitable representation across the Federation.

2026 PLD 1 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Establishment Division Office Manual, 1971, O. M. No. 1/14/71-TRV dated 20-09-1971DomicileFemale civil servantPrinciple

Exception to general principle under O.M. 1971, whereby domicile of a civil servant stands frozen upon entering civil service, has been carved out in the case of female officers who marry during service

Recognizing constitutional values of equality, dignity and realities of social mobility that accompany marital life, a limited concession is provided whereby a woman officer may, only once, adopt domicile of her husband if she seeks appointment to a post through direct recruitment

Such exception acknowledges that marriage often entails a change in residence and social identity and aims to accommodate such transitions without violating broader principle of domicile integrity

Such option is strictly a one-time concession in the entire service tenure of female officer

Once exercised, the new domicile (based on husband's domicile) stands frozen and remains immutable regardless of whether the officer is subsequently divorced, widowed, or remarries a person from another province

Such safeguard ensures that the exception does not evolve into an instrument of circumvention or manipulation and preserves the constitutional scheme of fair and equitable representation across the Federation.

2023 PLC(CS) 392 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
"Domicile' and 'residence'

Definition and distinction.

2021 PLD 492 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
S.17DomicilePermanent residentScope

Issuance of domicile certificate under Pakistan Citizenship Act, 1951 would make it evident that a particular person was a domicile of Pakistan

Expression "domicile" would reflect a person's status as a citizen of a particular State or country, whereas expression "permanent residence" might be a pure question of fact as to his residence in a particular area

2020 PLD 89 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
Art. 160(1)National Finance Commission (NFC)Non-Statutory MemberDomicile

Governor and Provincial Government or Chief Minister concerned has the prerogative to nominate any qualified person as a non-statutory member, irrespective of his/her domicile

Preference may be given to a person belonging to the Province concerned, with a view that he/she may have more knowledge about dynamics of the Province.

2018 PLC(CS)N 93 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Regln. 20(e)Advertisement for appointment of Medical Officers (Female)DomicileScopePetitioner was not considered for interview on the ground that she had not acquired domicile of the area of her husbandValidity

Candidate was permanent resident of Abbottabad (KPK) and got married to a person who belonged to Tribal Areas having domicile of FATA

Petitioner did not acquire the domicile of her husband's abode and appeared in the competitive examination on the basis of her own domicile

Female candidate had been provided a choice either to get the domicile of her husband's abode or to continue with her own domicile

Petitioner could not be deprived on her own domicile for entering into government service

Person once entered in service on the basis of his domicile could not change it for the purpose of acquiring another job in the government service

Domicile of petitioner was still intact in the present case

Petitioner was entitled to be considered for appointment against quota reserved for women candidates for the post in question

Name of petitioner be included in the list of candidates for interview and she be considered for appointment on the basis of her own domicile if otherwise eligible

Constitutional petition was allowed accordingly.

2014 MLD 863 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
R.6 (d)DomicileScope

Domicile once claimed by candidate and accepted by Federal Public Service Commission for the purpose of admission to an examination is final and no change is allowed at subsequent examination or selection.

2009 MLD 1160 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Art. 199Constitutional petitionMaintainabilityDomicile

Record showed that petitioner had fraudulently obtained domicile certificate of District "K", though he was not resident of District "K", but he was resident of District "S" and thus had usurped the right of the residents of District "S" for appointment in government department in their District

High Court declined to exercise extraordinary discretion in favour of the petitioner ho had not come to the court with clean hands having defrauded the authorities by producing forged documents

Constitutional petition was dismissed.

2009 CLC 1045 HIGH-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent

Domicile of father would prevail while deciding the domicile of a child and not of mother.

1999 CLC 103 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
DomicileCancellation of DomicileDistrict Magistrate after issuance of Certificate became officio

District Magistrate, by canceling Domicile Certificate, had acted illegally and arbitrarily as no such powers vested in him after issuing a Domicile Certificate. .

1996 CLC 1794 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent
Domicile"Domicile of origin" and "Domicile of choice"Distinction and effect and consequences. flowing therefrom

Domicile of origin after adopting domicile of choice, remains in abeyance during that period and is revived on abandonment of choice.

1995 CLC 259 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Domicile Educational institutionAdmission on basis of domicileFactum of domicileDomicile by choiceDomicile and residence two different concepts

Domicile and residence being different things, a person may have a permanent domicile at one place and temporary residence at another place

Any person can change his domicile and acquire a fresh domicile viz. domicile by choice

Where, however, any person claimed that he had acquired domicile of his choice, burden of proving the same would be on him

Considerable evidence would be required to prove such intention or such facturn

Children normally follow the domicile of their parents until they grow up and then can acquire a new domicile by operation of law as on being married or they can acquire domicile of their choice by settling permanently at a place other than their parents domicile

Where, however, any person was resident at a place in connection with his employment or other vocation for a definite period of time and not indefinitely, such domicile would not be permanent domicile but only for a special purpose

Where respondent (student) had obtained subsequent domicile for special purpose of getting admission, in medical college and had thus, usurped right of those who were permanently domiciled at that place, such subsequent domicile certificate would stand cancelled and petitioner being permanently domiciled there (and who had been wrongly deprived by respondent) would be accommodated in the seat occupied by respondent, while respondent's name would be struck off the college roll.

[Educational institution].

1994 MLD 1370 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Domicile

Minors are deemed in law to be holding the citizenship of their father.

1992 CLC 395 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Domicile Educational institution

Domicile certificate originally issued to petitioner was duly enquired into, after verification of concerned Tehsildar, based on the evidence of Chairman arid members of more than one Union Councils

Status of petitioner as also that of his father being. originally domicile of concerned district could not be disputed

Petitioner's father having shifted his residence to Gilgit and doing his business there, by itself would not be sufficient to indicate that he had abandoned his domicile of origin, more particularly when he was still holding his ancestral property therein. in token of his adherence thereto

Subsequent enquiry report and cancellation of domicile certificate being misconceived proceeded on wrong direction

Order of cancellation of petitioner's domicile was. thus, not sustainable.

1992 MLD 126 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Domicile

Person born in a particular place would be deemed to be domiciled there, unless it was shown that he, with the intention of abandoning the place of domicile, had left the same.

1992 CLC 895 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Domicile Domicile Certificate and Permanent Residence Certificate, granted to a person, could not subsequently be cancelled without issuing show-cause notice and without giving that person opportunity of being heard in accordance with principles of natural justice

1987 PLD 216 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
Educational institutionDomicile certificatePurpose of issuance-Domicile certificate can be issued for limited purpose of admission in professional CollegesSuch certificate could not be taken at par with a domicile certificate which created right of citizenship

Where petitioner was a citizen of a State by birth he/she would not require such certificate to be a citizen of such State.

1986 PLD 126 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent

Permanent residence-Persons in service-Citizen has a right to change his domicile at any time-In, case of persons in service who are generally posted at different places, it should be seen at what place they intend to reside permanently after retirement froth service.

1983 CLC 2803 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Main classes of. In law there are two main classes of domicile, one is the domicile of origin which is communicated by operation of law to each person at the time of his birth and the other domicile of choice which every person of full age is free to acquire in substitution for that which he possesses. The domicile of choice is voluntary and can be abandoned or changed according to the intention and permanent residence of a person while domicile of origin remains in abeyance during that period and can be revived.

1982 CLC 2383 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent

Possession of Domicile Certificate, held, does not give entitlement for grant of Permanent Residence Certificate if such person established to be not resident of District or to have abandoned that District for good.

1979 SCMR 529 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

S. 17-Pakistan Citizenship Rules, 1952, r. 23(b)-Prospectus of Bolan Medical College for Academic Session 1978, r. 23(5)(iv)Admission to Medical College-Domicile certificate-Validity of Place of domicile of a person-May even change under changed circumstances-Candidate in compliance with requirements of r. '23(5)(iv) of College Prospectus filing copy of domicile certificate issued by District Magistrate stating candidate's father to be a domicile of his District-Mere fact of District Magistrate of another District having also earlier issued a domicile certificate in favour of candidate's father stating him to be a domicile of his District-Did not detract against validity of second domicile certificate issued afterwards after more than eleven years-Candidate's father having been living for 30 years in a place within jurisdiction of District Magistrate

1975 SCMR 265 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Residence must answer qualitative as well as quantitative test Naturalisation; purchase of house; exercise of political rights; financial expectations; establishment of children in business; place of family residence-Indecia of a person's intention in regard to residence.

1975 PLD 979 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Law relating to-Domicile of choice-Animus mamendi-Indecia of residential intention-Domicile of choice is retained until abandonment i.e. giving up both residence and intention to reside-Woman on marriage acquires domicile of her husband.

1967 PLD 627 DHAKA-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

Domicile -Domicile of origin remains attached to person till such time as he not only manifests but carries into execution his intention of abandoning same and acquiring another-Loss of domicile of origin-Burden lies on person alleging-Pakistan (Control of Entry) Act (LY of 1952), S. 4 read with S. 3(6).

1964 PLD 140 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Domicile Person having no dwelling or place of residence

Deemed to be dwelling at place where he actually resides.

1962 PLD 558 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Domicile Wife's domicile is domicile of her husband

Law of domicile of husband allowing oral divorce-Such divorce if recognised as valid by Courts of country of domicile is binding on Courts of all countries-[Muhammadan Law-Divorce].

1961 PLD 616 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Domicile

Husband, perm-meet employee of North-Western Railway since 1922-Posted at Rawalpindi in 1930-Opted for Pakistan-Married at Rawalpindi in 1948 and continuing to live at Rawalpindi -Subsequently applying for being registered as citizen of United Kingdom on passing of British Nationality Act, 1948 -Held: husband had Pakistan domicile Domicile-Essentials

"Physical fact of residence" and "present" intention o f making place of residence one's "permanent home"- "Domicile" net to be confused with "naturalisation" or "nationality"-Domicile of origin-Change of domicile cannot be effected by mere change of intention-Being "domiciled in a country" does not require that domicile must be fixed at "particular" place in that country-Choice of domicile at coming into existence of Dominions of Pakistan and India-Option to serve Pakistan may include option to "change one's (existing) allegiance, political rights and even nationality"-Animus manendi in country of service-That option was "for .service only" must be proved by person asserting same Divorce Act (IV of 1869), S. 10-[Mrs. Marie Antoniette Palmer v. Mr. Oswals Robert Joseph Palmer P L D 1958 Lah. 699 & Dicey's Conflict of Laws, 6th Edition, p. 89 ref.]

1960 PLD 381 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Domicile

Principles for determination of domicile.

1958 PLD 923 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

S. 10-Domicile Actual residence and intention of permanent or indefinite residence Requisites for acquisition of domicile.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Domicile", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2564

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Domicile"

CLC 1996
Writ Petition No. 61 of 1996, decided on 21st May, 1996.

1996 C L C 1794

AMBREEN GUL and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus NOMINATION BOARD OF AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR, MUZAFFARABAD through Chairman, Muzaffarabad and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Azad J&K
CLC 1995
Civil Appeal No. 41 of 1995, decided on 16th July, 1995.

1995 C L C 1761

FOZIA HUSSAIN ABBASI‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE NOMINATION BOARD through Chairman and 4 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: SC (AJ&K)
CLC 1998
Civil Appeal No. 46 of 1997, decided on 4th November, 1997.

1998 C L C 534

Miss SHAHIDA BANG‑‑‑Appellant Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
CLC 2015
2014-August-26

2015 C L C 859

Mst. KHADIJA SHAHEEN ALI — Petitioner Versus DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, RAJAN PUR and another — Respondents

Court: Lahore
CLC 1995
Writ Petition No. 698 of 1993, decided on 26th October, 1994.

1995 C L C 259

Mst. SALEHA IBTISAM‑‑‑Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN, ADMISSION COMMITTEE, PAKISTAN KING EDWARD MEDICAL COLLEGE LAHORE and 5 others‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1958
Letters Patent Appeal No.. 3 of 1956, decided on 5th July 1958, against the judgment of Akhlaque Husain, J, dated the 9th January 1956, passed to F. A. O. No. 34 of 1955.

P L D 1958 (W

A. W. CARTER‑Appellant Versus MRS: J. M: CARTER‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1992
Writ Petition No. 121 of 1990; decided on 10th September, 1991.

P L D 1992 Peshawar

AHMAD HASSAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ABDULLAH and 5 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: ‑‑‑‑S.17‑‑‑Pakistan Citizenship Rules, 1952, R. 23 & Appendix VIII, Form P ‑‑ Government of N: W.F.P. Notification No.EXA (30)8‑1/71, dated 18‑9‑1978‑‑ "Ordinary Domicile Certificate" issued to a person seeking admission in any of the educational institutions was not at par with "domicile certificate" envisaged in the Pakistan Citizenship Act, 1951‑‑‑Ordinary Domicile Certificate issued to a candidate for admission is issued in exercise of administrative authority of District Magistrate concerned under a communication of the Law Department of the Provincial Government of N: W.F.P. for purpose of determining the domicile of an applicant who seeks admission‑‑‑Such certificate though is issued administratively, yet issuance of such .certificate creates a right in the .holder thereof‑‑‑Procedure to be followed in issuing‑‑ "Ordinarily domicile certificates"----Domicile
SCMR 1980
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 212-R of 1979, decided on 21st November, 1979.

1980 S C M R 456

MUHAMMAD YAR KHAN-Petitioner Versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER-CUM-POLITICAL AGENT,

Court: It is a well-settled principle of Private International Law, to which reference is necessary, as "domicile" has not been defined in the Pakistan Citizenship Act, that every person carries the domicile of the country in which he is born; that so long as he does not intentionally and by the exercise of free volition choose the domicile of another country he carries the domicile of his origin ; and that to prove that he had acquired another domicile of his choice he must show that he had intentionally taken a decision in that behalf in the sense that he had taken abode therein with the intention making it his permanent resi dence.-Words and phrases.
PLC(CS)N 2018
W.P. No.38068 of 2016, decided on 7th December, 2016.

2018 P L C (C

Mst. MAMUNA AMIN Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB through Secretary Education and 4 others

Court: Lahore High Court
CLC 1983
1982-December-23

1983 C L C 626

MISS SHAMIM ALI-Petitioner Versus AZAD JAMMU & KASHMIR COUNCIL THROUGH SECRETARY

Court: Azad J & K