Emergency Regulations Framed by Vice-Chancellor
Emergency Regulations Framed by Vice-Chancellor legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Ss. 15, 28 & 32 read with S. 7 and Emergency Regulations framed by Vice-Chancellor - Admission to Law College evening classes-Vires of Regulations-Discrimination-University may prohibit or restrict admission only on basis of such considerations as age, place of residence, domicile etc. which do not find specific mention in S. 7 but not to a class. or classes . of people or on grounds of religion, caste etc. - Regulations framed by Vice-Chancellor interpreted by Principal to mean morning classes meant for persons below 26 years of age and evening classes exclusively for employees of Government and statutory bodies irrespective of their ages-Proposition, held, violative of S, 7 of Act.-[Educational Institutions-Vires of statutes].
"Emergency Regulations Framed by Vice-Chancellor", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2591
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Emergency Regulations Framed by Vice-Chancellor"
P L D 1982 Lahore 411
REHMATULLAH‑Petitioner Versus UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB AND others‑Respondents
Court: Ss: 150)(3), 28(2)(c) & 32(1), (2) and Emergency Regulations framed by Vice--‑Chancellor,, reglns. 9 & 12‑Admission to Law College Vires of Regulations‑Vice‑Chancellor though can act in emergency and take such action as maybe necessary yet he has thereafter to report such action, for approval to officer, authority, or other body, who or which, in ordinary course would have dealt with same‑Action thus taken could either be approved or rejected‑Vice--Chancellor's action in such regard stipulates (i) emergency, (ii) action, and (iii) approval by competent authority‑Petitioner refused admission to Law College evening classes on ground of not being an employee of Government, semi‑Government or a statutory body‑No emergency shown but on contrary similar regulations under emergency authority of Vice--‑Chancellor enforced for last many years‑Action taken by Vice‑--Chancellor, held, not taken to cater for any emergency. but for a.. permanent need and omission ‑on part of Vice--‑Chancellor to get same covered through legally constituted bodies may rather amount to defeating very law and violation of S. 15(1).‑Educational Institutions‑Vires of statutes.1999 M L D 587
MUHAMMAD NADEEM and 17 others — Petitioners Versus UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY through Vice-Chancellor — Respondent
Court: Lahore1992 M L D 539
Miss NAVEEDA FAROOQ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus PRINCIPAL, FEDERAL GOVERNMENT COLLEGE FOR WOMEN, RAWALPINDI CANTT and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1984 C L C 721
MUHAMMAD KHALID KHAN‑Petitioner Versus QUAID‑I‑AZAM UNIVERSITY, ISLAMABAD AND 3 OTHERS ‑Respondents
Court: Lahore1989 C L C 1303
ISHTIAQUR REHMAN‑‑Petitioner Versus THE CHANCELLOR, N.‑W.F.P. UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING
Court: Peshawar2003 P L C (C
Maj. (Retd.) RAFIQUE AHMED DURRANI, SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, AJ&K UNIVERSITY MUZAFFARABAD Versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, AJ&K UNIVERSITY, MUZAFFARABAD and others
Court: Azad J&K1996 S C M R 1790
MUNAZA HABIB and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE VICE‑CHANCELLOR and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1982 C L C 1562
ZAFAR MAHMOOD AND ANOTHER‑Petitioners Versus PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY,
Court: Lahore1999 S C M R 2590
MUHAMMAD SHAHID and 6 others — Petitioners Versus VICE-CHANCELLOR, PUNJAB UNIVERSITY, LAHORE
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1993 Lahore 341
ADNAN TARIQ‑‑Petitioner Versus VICE‑CHANCELLOR OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PUNJAB‑‑Respondent
Court: