English Law
English Law legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Position of a married woman under English Law.
English law-[Simpson and Company v. Thomson, Burrel (1878) 3 A C 279 ; London Assurance Co. v. Sainsbury (1873) 3 Dougl. 245, 254=99 E R 636; MacGillivrayon Insurance Law ; Yates v. Whyte (1838) 4 Bing. N C 283 ; John Edwards and Company v. Motor Union Insurance Co. Ltd. (1922) 2 K B 249 ; Yorkshire Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Misbeth Shipping Co., Ltd. (1961) 2 A E L R 487 ; Randal v. Cockran 27 E R 916 and King v. Victoria Insurance Company Ltd., 1896 A C 250 ref.
English Law Principles, how far can be relied on.
English Law-"Dedication or lost grant"-Application of doctrines to cremation ground in an Indian village-Whether justified
"Dedication" is irrevocable lincense granted by owner of soil to use of public, not to a limited section e.g. the inhabitants of a village.
"English Law", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2594
Precedents & Case Laws citing "English Law"
P L D 1954 Privy Council 108
NKAU MAJARA‑Appellant Versus THE QUEEN‑Respondent
Court:P L D 2017 Sindh 396
SAJID PLASTIC FACTORY through Sole Proprietor — Plaintiff Versus MSC BAHAMAS through Master/Chief Officer and 9 others — Defendants
Court: High Court2001 C L C 479
MASOOD ASIF and others‑‑‑Plaintiffs Versus UNITED BANK LIMITED‑‑-Defendant
Court: KarachiP L D 1957 Privy Council 92
LAILA JHINA MAWJI and another‑Appellants Versus THE QUEEN‑Respondent
Court: Criminal conspiracy‑-------Between husband and wife only Whether indictable under law of Tanganyika (East Africa) Rule of English Law‑‑Pakistan Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 120‑A‑Evidence Act (I of 1872). S. 122.P L D 1956 Privy Council 9
LEONG and another-Appellants Versus LIM BENG CHYE-Respondent
Court:P L D 1963 Dacca 201
SAFAR ALI‑ — Appellant Versus ABUL HASHIM AND ANOTHER — ‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1971 Karachi 314
THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA‑ — Appellant Versus MESSRS GAMMON‑LAYTON, KARACHI Respondent
Court: (a) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 86‑Provisions applicable to foreign Rulers and not to foreign States‑A. M. Quershi v. Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and another P L D 1968 Kar. 443 overruled.1988 C L C 299
A.R. MOHAMED SIDDIK and others‑‑Plaintiffs Versus THE TRANS OCEANIC STEAMSHIP
Court: KarachiP L D 2015 Sindh 341
GENESIS AVIATION SERVICES (PVT.) LTD. — Plaintiff Versus GULF AIR COMPANY G.S.C. — Defendant
Court: High Court