Establishment Manual Vol. III
Establishment Manual Vol. III legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Government of Pakistan, Establishment Division Memorandum No. 3/3/50-E VII, dated 4-6-1960, para. 2-Civil service-Temporary nature of employment "until further orders" and being further subject "to approval of Federal Public Service Commission"-On reference to Public Service Commission civil servant not found fit for being selected-Termination of service-Civil servant before termination of employment, in circumstances, was not entitled to protection of constitutional guarantee provided by Art. 177(l)(b), Constitution of Pakistan (1962).-[Civil service].
"Establishment Manual Vol. III", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2598
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Establishment Manual Vol. III"
1980 P L C (C
S. ZAHOOR HAIDER ZAIDI Versus MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE, PLANT PROTECTION DEPARTMENT
Court: Federal Service Tribunal1994 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD ANWAR and 5 others Versus MINISTRY OF INTERIOR and others
Court: Federal Service TribunalP L D 1996 Supreme Court 771 '
CABINET DIVISION, ISLAMABAD and another ‑‑‑ Appellants Versus PRIME MINSTER OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD and others ‑‑‑ Respondents
Court: High Court1999 P L C (C
MEHTAB RASHEED RANA and another Versus CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, ISLAMABAD and others
Court: Federal Service Tribunal1997 PLC (C
MUHAMMAD ARSHAD SULTAN, SECTION OFFICER, CABINET DIVISION, ISLAMABAD and others, Versus PRIME MINISTER OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD and 31 others
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1984 Supreme Court 354
PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER-Petitioners Versus Civil Appeal No. 24 of 1979, decided on 30th April, 1984.
Court: Art. 185(3)-Civil service-Leave to appeal granted to consider question whether in the context of temporary nature of employment of a civil servant, until further orders, and being further "subject to approval of Federal Public Service Commission or replacement if choice of Commission did not fall on him" his employment was correctly construed as being amenable to constitutional guarantee.--Civil services.P L D 1973 Supreme Court 497
MUHAMMAD SHARIF‑Petitioner Versus THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, BASIC DEMOCRACIES, SOCIAL WELFARE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, LAHORE AND 3 OTHES‑Respondents
Court:1993 P L C (C
LAHORE Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, GUJRANWALA ZONE,
Court: Lahore High CourtP L D 1982 Karachi 913
REHMAT ALI‑Petitioner Versus THE SECURITY PAPERS LTD. AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: S------2(xxviii) read with West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), S. 2(1)‑ "Worker and workman"‑Difference‑Definition of worker and work man given in Industrial Relations Ordinance, held, much wider in its scope as compared to definition given in Standing Orders Ordinance (VI of 1968).‑Interpretation of statutes.1985 P Cr
SHAMMAN‑‑Appellant Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court: Federal Shariat Court