Fourteenth Amendment
Fourteenth Amendment legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
R. 6 [before amendment] ??? Deputy Commissioner, prior to amendment in R.6, being the appointing authority was competent to hear the appeal though he was the Chairman or member of the Screening Committee which recorded the recommendation against the Respondent ??? Power to hear such appeals was conferred on the Commissioner with effect from 14?5?1959 and not before? ?Commissioner thus could not pass any order on the appeal preferred prior to 14?5?1959 which was effectively disposed of by the Deputy Commissioner vide order dated 25?4?1959 by accepting the same.
"Fourteenth Amendment", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2649
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Fourteenth Amendment"
P L D 1958 Supreme Court (Pak
Ch. ATA ELAHI‑Appellant Versus Mst. PARVEEN ZOHRA and others‑Respondents
Court:2015 S C M R 1152
SUE EVENWEL, ET AL — Appellant Versus GREG ABBOTT, GOVERNOR OF TEXAS, ET AL — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of the United StatesP L D 2001 Azad J&K 24
Chaudhry ABDUL MAJEED and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR GOVERNMENT through Chief
Court:P L D 1957 (W
Mst. PARVEEN ZOHRA and others‑Petitioners Versus (1) PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN — Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 1957 Supreme Court (Pak
JIBENDRA KISHORE ACHHARYYA CHOWDHURY and 58 others‑Appellants Versus THE PROVINCE OF EAST PAKISTAN AND SECRETARY,
Court: High CourtP L D 1965 Dacca 86
GOLAM SARWAR MOLLA‑Petitioner Versus CHAIRMAN AND MEMBERS OF ELECTION TRIBUNAL, EAST PAKISTAN, DACCA AND OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: (a) Settlement of Disputes (First Elections) Order President's Order No. 13 of 1962,2018 C L C 1202
Sardar SHER BAHADUR and 5 others — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law, Islamabad and another — Respondents
Court: Peshawar (Abbottabad Bench)2016 S C M R 1561
TERRANCE WILLIAMS — Petitioner Versus PENNSYLVANIA — Respondent
Court: Supreme Court of United States2016 P Cr
MIAN KHAN and another — Petitioners Versus The STATE and another — Respondents
Court: Lahore2023 P T D 492
COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, LAHORE Versus Messrs DESCON ENGINEERING LIMITED, LAHORE
Court: Lahore High Court