Home Maxims & Terms General International Law meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

General International Law

General International Law legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1998 SCMR 1442 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
F.R. 22(A)(i)Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 212(3)SalarySelection of civil servant in BS-18 in autonomous body managed and controlled by Federal Government

Petitioner although was selected against BS-18 yet his pay was less than what he was drawing while in Government service

Petitioner's application for protection and fixation of his pay was dismissed as also his appeal before Service Tribunal

Validity

Leave to appeal was granted to consider, whether petitioner was entitled to protection of his pay particularly keeping in view cases of other employees similarly placed which were differently treated and they were given protection to salaries which they were drawing in their parent department.

1981 PLD 377 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Constitutive elements of: (i) must have a general practice of states and (ii) such general practice must have acceptance of. state;! as lawMere habitual following of a certain line of conduct either in doing or not doing something

Not sufficient-Existence of rule of International Customary Law or General International Law-Held, can be established only when States shown to act in such way due to recognition of their legal obligation to such effect.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "General International Law", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2659

Precedents & Case Laws citing "General International Law"

PLD 1981
Civil Appeal No. K‑25 of 1970, decided on 8th July, 1981.

P L D 1981 Supreme Court 377

A. M. QURESHI‑Appellant Versus UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS AND ANOTHER‑

Court:
CLD 2021
5 March 1991 Commercial Ch., 1992 Rev. Arb. 66 and note by L. Ayn s and Tjong Very Sumito and others v. Antig Investments Pte. Ltd; the Singapore Supreme Court [2009] 4 S.L.R.(R) 732, [2009] S.G.C.A. 41 ref

2021 C L D 1069

ORIENT POWER COMPANY (PRIVATE) LIMITED through Authorized Officer — Petitioner Versus SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LIMITED through Managing Director — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
SCMR 2021
Fiona Trust and Holding Corporation v. Privalov [2007] UKHL 40; AmTrust Europe Ltd v. Trust Risk Group SpA [2015] EWCA Civ 437; French Supreme Court on 14 May 1996 1st Civ. Chamber, 14 May 1996, 1997 Rev. Arb. 535; French Supreme Court decided on 5 March 1991 Commercial Ch., 1992 Rev. Arb. 66 and note by L. Ayn s and Tjong Very Sumito and others v. Antig Investments Pte. Ltd; the Singapore Supreme Court [2009] 4 S.L.R.(R) 732, [2009] S.G.C.A. 41 ref.

2021 S C M R 1728

ORIENT POWER COMPANY (PRIVATE) LIMITED through Authorized Officer — Petitioner Versus SUI NORTHERN GAS PIPELINES LIMITED through Managing Director — Respondent

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLD 1993
C. P. No.D‑529 of 1990, heard on 9th September, 1992.

P L D 1993 Karachi 93

Messrs NAJIB ZARAB LIMITED‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through the Secretary

Court:
PLD 2000
Writ Petition No. 13013 of 2000, decided on 6th July, 2000,

P L D 2000 Lahore 483

M.D.TAHIR, ADVOCATE‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary,

Court:
PLD 2014
2013-December-10

P L D 2014 Supreme Court 305

Human Rights Case No.29388-K of 2013

Court: High Court
CLD 2002
First Appeal from Order 9 of 2002, heard on 14th February, 2002.

2002 C L D 790

SGS SOCIETE GENERALE ‑‑‑Appellant Versus PAKISTANI‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1971
Civil Revision No. 168 of 1963, decided on 3rd December 1970.

P L D 1971 Lahore 748

A. GEORGE‑ — Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES

Court: (b) Pakistan International Airlines Corporation Act (XIX of 1956), Ss. 29 & 30‑Terms and conditions of service of employee prescribed by Corporation in the form of "Service Code"‑Provi sions of "Service Code" do not have the force of statutory rules made by Central Government under S. 29 or of Regulation made by Board under S. 30‑Shahid Khalil v. The Pakistan International Airlines Corporation Writ Petition No. 403 of 1963 dissented from.
PLD 2013
2013-May-9

P L D 2013 Peshawar 94

FOUNDATION FOR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and 4 others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PTD 2024
C.Ps. Nos. 560-K to 589-K of 2019, decided on 12th January, 2024.

2024 P T D 662

COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-IV, KARACHI Versus Messrs A.P. MOLLER MAERSK and another

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan