Home Maxims & Terms High Court meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

High Court

High Court legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2018 PLD 836 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Art. 201High CourtJudgment per incuriamScope

Any contrary decision given by the subsequent Bench of equal strength of High Court in ignorance of the terms of statute, binding precedent of Supreme Court, or previous decision of Bench of equal strength/Benches of coordinate jurisdiction of the same Court, would be a judgement per incuriam and without any precedential value.

2017 CLD 1028 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S. 2(b)(ii)High CourtJurisdictionScope

High Court while exercising jurisdiction under Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001, adjudicate upon civil rights and liabilities of parties and it may be termed as special jurisdiction

High Court possesses all attributes of original civil jurisdiction but under Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finances) Ordinance, 2001, it does not exercise ordinary original civil jurisdiction conferred by C.P.C.

2015 PLD 69 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
Art. 199High CourtJudicial review, power ofScopeLegislative instrument

While exercising the power of judicial review, the court was hardly concerned with good or bad aspects of the legislative instrument rather the prime, paramount and pivotal consideration (of the court) was the constitutionality of the statute

Court had to ensure and remain satisfied that any of the provisions of the enactment was not violative of the Constitution.

2011 PLC(CS) 1569 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Administrative mattersPowers

High Court in administrative matters cannot change/alter the mandate of law/rules and regulations.

1993 PLD 545 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Original civil jurisdiction

Concept of High Court's original civil jurisdiction elaborated.

1991 SCMR 599 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
High CourtJurisdiction ofOuster

Claim in respect of ouster of power of the High Court in respect of any matter or subject available to it under the Code of Civil Procedure or Criminal Procedure Code cannot be lightly accepted, unless there is a clear, definite and positive provision ousting the jurisdiction

Express words or clear intendment or necessary implication are required to take away the jurisdiction of High Court or any superior Court.

1991 PLD 224 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Inherent powers ofInherent powers of High CourtExercise of suo motu powers by High Court

Genesis and basis of such authority traced.

1980 PLD 69 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Types of jurisdiction invested.-[Jurisdiction]. The High Court in the present context of legislation has been invested with various types of jurisdictions. The jurisdiction conferred upon it under the Constitution is called the "Constitutional jurisdiction". The High Court has the "extraordinary civil jurisdiction" under which it transfers to itself for trial any case of civil nature pending before a subordinate Court. Then there is the jurisdiction of the High Court conferred under various statutes, for example, the jurisdiction under the Companies Act, 1913 under the Insurance Act and jurisdiction as was vested in it under section 21 of the Displaced Persons (Land Settlement) Act, 1958. Such type of jurisdictions are termed as "statutory jurisdictions".

1979 SCMR 200 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Ss. 366 & 369-High Court-Power to rehear after passing oral orders-Order pronounced orally in light of provisions of Ss. 366 & 369, held, no bar to rehearing of case by High Court before actual signing and sealing of order.

[Judgment-Review].

1978 SCMR 381 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Appellate jurisdiction-Appeal before High Court not confined to any particular point and vires of decision of civil Court ascertaining entitlement of persons to compensation called in question-High Court having to consider each and every aspect of matter in order to come to a right and just conclusion, its order for surrender of compensation received by petitioners, held, just and proper.

1975 PLD 1372 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Civil jurisdiction-High Court in disposing of a Constitutional petition wider Art. 199 of Constitution (1973)-Does not pass orders in exercise of its original civil jurisdiction-Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199.

1974 PLD 29 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Practice-Mere grant of leave by Supreme Court against judgment passed by High Court-Cannot preclude High Court from referring to such judgment-Criminal trial.

1974 PLD 10 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
=

Practice-Division Bench cannot dissent from view taken by an earlierDivision Bench unless it be contrary to judgment of Supreme Court or it be per in curiam-Later Division Bench acting in ignorance of its own previous decision or that of a Court of co-ordinate jurisdiction-Subsequent Court may decide as to which of two decisions it should follow.

1973 PLD 1 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

High Court High Court Judges, appointment of-Press and public-Not to arrogate to themselves right of commenting as to suitability or otherwise of Judge.

1970 SCMR 857 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

(b) Practice-High Court-High Court will be slow in disturbing finding of fact and shall give proper weight to views of trial Judge as to credibility of witnesses.

1970 PLD 1 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

High Court-Civil proceeding-High Court though it exercises civil jurisdiction is not a "Civil Court"-Nevertheless provisions of C. P. C. apply to High Court.

1970 PLD 21 DHAKA-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

S. 7High Court-Admiralty jurisdiction of-Extends to inland water ways of rivers.

1968 PTD 859 CALCUTTA-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Income-tax-High Court - Writ petition after preferring appeal-Interference-Constitution of India, Art. 226.

1965 PTD 264 ALLAHABAD-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

High Court-Writ petitions-Power to review orders to prevent miscarriage of justice-Constitution of India, Art. 226.

1963 PLD 326 DHAKA-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

-High Court-Reference to larger Bench-Proper only when conflict of decisions in same High Court or in High Courts of same state.

1961 PLD 333 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

High Court High Court-No power to review own judgments in criminal cases except to correct clerical errors or as provided specifically by law.High Court-Chief Justice's administrative order-Not open to scrutiny by High Court though its sanctity be not same as of a judicial order.

1958 PLD 6 SUPREME-COURT-AZAD-KASHMIR Judicial Precedent

High Court -Practice-Judgment of Judge cannot be modified by other Judge. A judgment of a single judge of High Court sitting as a Revisional Court is a judgment of the High Court and n other judge or Bench of judges of this Court has power to modify such judgment. The judicial powers of the Chief justice are not greater than or different from but are exactly the same as those of any other judge of the High Court.

1956 PLD 50 FEDERAL-COURT-OF-PAKISTAN Judicial Precedent
High Court

Being friend of a party, does not make the Judge a party interested in the cause and therefore disqualified - to be a Judge In the cause.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "High Court", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2691

Precedents & Case Laws citing "High Court"

PLD 1960
Second Miscellaneous Appeal No. 22 of 1957, decided on 17th February 1959.

P L D 1960 Dacca 351

GOPESH CHANDRA DEB‑Appellant Versus KUTI MIAH and another‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1977
Transfer Miscellaneous Application No. K-27 of 1976, decided on 22nd October 1976.

P L D 1977 Supreme Court I

MIR HASSAN-Petitioner Versus TARIQ SAEED AND 2 others -Respondents

Court:
PLC(CS) 2011
Writ Petition No.3934 with Civil Miscellaneous No.1209 of 2010, decided on 22nd November, 2011.

2011 P L C (C

MUHAMMAD IMRAN Versus PESHAWAR HIGH COURT, PESHAWAR through Registrar and 2 others

Court: Peshawar High Court
PLD 1953
(This case was referred to the above noted Full Bench vide orders of the Division Bench consisting of the Cornelius and Muhammad Khurshid Zaman, JJ. dated the 7th October 1952).

P L D 1953 Lahore 98

Khan HAMID ULLAH KHAN, Member Election Commission, and another‑Defendants‑Appellants Versus Mst. NAZIR BEGUM and others‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1957
30th July 1957

P L D 1957 Supreme Court (Pak

HATIM BADR‑UD‑DIN TYABJI‑-Appellant Versus THE CHIEF JUSTICE AND JUDGES OF THE HIGH

Court: High Court
PLD 1966
Civil Appeal No. 48‑D of 1965, decided on 20th May 1966.

P L D 1966 Supreme Court 753

MRS. MOMTAZ MALLIK‑Appellant Versus (1) THE TAXING OFFICER (REGISTRAR, HIGH COURT), AND

Court:
PLD 1975
Letters Patent Appeal No. 1 of 1974, decided on 3rd September 1974.

P L D 1975 Lahore 379

M. JAMIL CHAUDHRY AND ANOTHER -Appellants Versus M. HANIF CHAUDHURY AND 4 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: As amended, S. 3(3)‑Interlocutory order, appeal against‑‑Not competent.
PLD 2017
1991-February-25

P L D 2017 Supreme Court 207

PROVINCE OF SINDH — Appellant Versus Haji RAZZAQ and others — Respondents

Court: (a) Sindh Courts Act (VII of 1926) since repealed--
YLRN 2017
First Civil Appeal No.13 of 2011, decided on 24th February, 2017.

2017 Y L R Note 427

LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER/ DEPUTY DISTRICT OFFICER, KHAIRPUR and another — Appellants Versus Syed ABDULLAH SHAH through L. Rs. and others — Respondents

Court: Sindh (Sukkur Bench)
PLD 1957
Civil Reference No. 253 of 1956, decided on 20th February 1957.

P L D 1957 (W

Court: