Incident
Incident legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Incident-Meaning.
S. 26-A-Registration of firm Words and phrases-"Constituted by"-Expression means, firm must have been "set up" or "established" "by" deed-Such "setting up" must be in the relevant accounting year-Registration effective from date of deed-Registration to be refused for period antecedent to date of deed in the accounting year-No question of liberal interpretation of S. 26-A (by Fazle-Akbar and Hamoodur Rahman, JJ., Cornelius, C. J., being of the view that registration should be extended to such antecedent period if firm was genuinely in existence during such period, determining date of commencement of firm being a binding duty of Income-tax Officer)-Circular of Central Board of Revenue, departing from provisions of statute-"Course pursued by Board seems to be correct" (Fazle-Akbar and Hamoodur Rahman, JJ., Cornelius, C. J., contra)-Income-tax Act (XI of 1922), Ss. 23 (5) (b) & 28-Income-tax Rules, 1922, rr. 2 to 6-B.
"Incident", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2732
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Incident"
2003 P Cr
Haji NADIR KHAN and 2 others — Appellants Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Quetta1984 P Cr
ABDUL RAZAK AND ANOTHER- Appellants Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: Azad J & K2002 Y L R 3667
BAZ MUHAMMAD and another‑‑‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Karachi2016 Y L R 463
SADA BUX and another — Appellants Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: Sindh2026 P Cr
Zaeem Imran — Petitioner Versus The State and others — Respondents
Court: Sindh1980 P Cr
SHAH BAKHSH AND 2 OTHERS‑Appellants Versus THE STATE‑Respondent
Court: Karachi2019 Y L R 1214
MUHAMMAD UMER DAHRI — Appellant Versus ACHAR and 8 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh (Hyderabad Bench)2006 M L D 1380
MUHAMMAD FAISAL alias PEHALWAN — Appellant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Karachi