Innuendo
Innuendo legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Innuendo generally understood by people throughout country-Proof not necessary. It was contended by the defendants that the plaintiff had relied upon an innuendo as the words per se are not defamatory and the plaintiff has failed to lead any evidence to prove the innuendo.
"Innuendo", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2801
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Innuendo"
2005 C L D 840
Syed MEHMOOD ALI ‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus NETWORK TELEVISION MARKETING (PVT.) LTD. and another‑‑‑Defendants
Court: KarachiP L D 2005 Karachi 399
Syed MEHMOOD ALI ‑‑‑Plaintiff Versus NETWORK TELEVISION MARKETING (PVT.) LTD and another‑‑‑Defendants
Court: High Court1988 P Cr
KHALIL AHMED — Applicant Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: KarachiP L D 1960 (W
AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ‑Plaintiff Versus M. S. KHWAJA‑Defendant
Court:P L D 1981 Karachi 515
ALTAF GAUHAR‑Plaintiff Versus WAJID SHAMSUL HASAN AND ANOTHER‑Defendants
Court: ‑‑‑ Libel‑‑Local jurisdiction of Courts‑‑Publication of libel in news papers‑Action would lie both at places where newspapers published as well as where circulated‑Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 9. Jurisdiction.1988 C I
Capt. BENARAS KHAN P.N. (Retd.)‑‑Plaintiff Versus Commodore AKHTAR HANIF and another‑‑Defendants,
Court: KarachiP L D 2022 Supreme Court 385
TAHIR NAQASH and others — Petitioners Versus The STATE and others — Respondents
Court: High Court1975 S C M R 106
MUHAMMAD WARIS — Appellant Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER — Respondents
Court: High CourtF L D 1979 Lahore 663
MUHAMMAD. ANWAR — Appellant Versus THE STATE-Respondent
Court: --- Appreciation of evidence-Eye-witnesses as well as recovery evidence disbelieved and statement of accused appellant alone left to be considered-Statement of accused, in such circumstances, held, either to be accepted or rejected as a whole.-Evidence.1996 P Cr
MUHAMMAD ANWAR — Petitioner Versus THE STATE — Respondent
Court: Lahore