Arsh

In some cases it was awarded in addition to sentence. of imprisonment, but in the case under Sir: 334/336, P. P. C. same was mandatory and sentence of imprisonment could be in addition to Arsh

Arsh, under S.337-Q, P. P. C could be given for an individual organ

Sentence of imprisonment was not substitution of Arsh or mandatory in addition to Arsh to be awarded for damaging each organ as a result of one hurt or component hurt

Victim was to be compensated through Arsh whereas sentence of imprisonment as Tazir was to be awarded for criminal administration of justice

Where compensation as Arsh could be given for each organ separately in terms of S. 337-W, P. P. C Punishment of imprisonment as provided under S. 334 or S. 336, P. P. C. would be for hurt and not for organ and same could be awarded more than once for each organ separately

Three organs in the present case were damaged as a result of one injury in single transaction and accused having been charged as such, could not be punished twice or thrice for same offence.