International Law
International Law legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Foreign judgment is given recognition in International law on the basis of principle of reciprocity and comity that gives rise to rights and obligations.
General rule is that the provisions of a treaty are not automatically incorporated into the municipal law and a country's legislature must pass legislation to implement them
High Court observed that courts in Pakistan are required to interpret and apply every statute, so far as its language admits, in accordance with the principle of comity of nations and the recognized norms of international law, even in situations where no such law has been enacted.
International law unless in direct conflict with municipal law ought to be applied and respected by municipal courts in deciding matters arising therefrom.
Every State was duty bound to take necessary measures to ensure that the persons belonging to minorities may exercise fully/effectively all their human rights and fundamental freedoms without any discrimination and in full equality before law
States were required to create favourable conditions to enable minorities to express their characteristics and to develop their culture, language, religion, traditions and customs, except where specific practices were in violation of national law and contrary to international standards.
State, due to its commitments under International Law, has the duty/obligation to ensure dignity of a girl/woman.
General rule is that the provisions of a treaty are not automatically incorporated into municipal law and a country's legislature must enact law to implement them
In Pakistan, even where such legislation has not been passed, the courts are required to interpret and apply every statute, as far as its language admits, in accordance with the principles of comity of nations and established rules of international law.
Article 15 of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights declares that everyone has the right of nationality.
Enforceable domestically (in a country) only if incorporated in the municipal law (of that country).
International law unless in direct conflict with municipal law, ought to be applied and respected by municipal courts in deciding matters arising therefrom.
There is no international obligation upon sovereign State to accept request for extradition of a person within its territorial jurisdiction
Sovereignty of a State has legal authority over people within its territorial borders
Host State has to enter into arrangements with other sovereign States, whereby it may divest some of its sovereign powers including power to try a person for offence or to allow that person to remain within its territorial jurisdiction and to allow his extradition to other State to face trial.
When international obligations and bilateral commitments come in conflict with municipal laws, the latter are to prevail.
Where a contract is entered into with a foreign national or a foreign company, it is governed by the municipal laws of the country where the contract is executed subject to any special provision to the contrary incorporated in the contract.
Long-standing practices and customs, in absence of express statutory provisions, would be regarded as an essential source of law
Principles stated.
Interaction of a State as a whole with other Nations undoubtedly is based upon mutual respect and confidence and this stands true for the judicial organ as well
When world has squeezed into a global village, it has become expedient that principles of comity should be strictly applied, adhered and resorted to all levels of the State institutions
Upon such principle, Court of one jurisdiction, subject to condition that orders do not contravene any domestic law of country should give the effect to judicial decisions of Courts of another State, as a matter of deference and mutual respect, even if no obligation exists to do so
It should be based upon willingness on part of judiciary of one civilized State to grant privilege and respect to orders of foreign jurisdiction-It is the matter of mutual accommodation, shown to the orders of each other, especially which are passed in proper exercise of jurisdiction
Such respect is founded and structured upon rules of courtesy, civility, affability, amity, consideration, gesture of goodwill and good fellowship to the orders passed by the Court of other country.
Implications.
Rules of International Law should be accommodated in the Municipal 'Law even without express legislative sanction provided they do not run into conflict with Acts of Parliament
Doctrine of incorporation
Connotation
Obligation of Courts in cases of conflict between the International Law and the Municipal Law.
Agent should spend Pakistan rupees for obtaining the determined and ascertained amount of dollars for payment to the parent company even in case of devaluation of Pakistan currency meanwhile.
When a country recognizes a new State it relates back retrospectively to the date when the new State was created.
Pakistani Courts are not entitled to take note of the factum of violation of any provision of International agreement or law, in the absence of any provision in the relevant law??Courts in Pakistan are bound to give effect to the municipal laws as they are.
Jurisdiction- Personal jurisdiction or jurisdiction over parties when lies-Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 20 (c).-[Jurisdiction].
Words "due fulfilment" occurring in treaty-Treaty containing a clause making Trade Representation responsible for "due fulfilment" of contract
Words "due fulfillment of contract"-Held, mean fulfilment of part of their obligation undertaken by them voluntarily or by execution through courts of lex situs, i. e., Pakistan Courts Such interpretation consistent with Articles 4 to 7 of Statute concerning trade mission and trade agencies of U. S. S. R.. abroad.
"International Law", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2865
Precedents & Case Laws citing "International Law"
P L D 1993 Karachi 93
Messrs NAJIB ZARAB LIMITED‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through the Secretary
Court:2021 M L D 1559
AQIB JAVED and another — Petitioners Versus HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN and 7 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)P L D 1965 (W
MESSRS GAMMON LAYTON, KARACHI‑-Plaintiff Versus SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE UNITED STATES
Court:P L D 1981 Supreme Court 377
A. M. QURESHI‑Appellant Versus UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS AND ANOTHER‑
Court:P L D 2016 Supreme Court 174
MUHAMMAD RAMZAN (DECEASED) through L.Rs. and others — Appellants Versus NASREEN FIRDOUS and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1952 Federal Court 120
HER HIGHNESS MUNAWAR JAHAN BEGUM OF JUNAGADH‑Appellant Versus CROWN‑Respondent
Court: High Court1998 C L C 534
Miss SHAHIDA BANG‑‑‑Appellant Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)P L D 1968 Karachi 443
A. M. QUERSHI‑Plaintiff Versus UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS Through
Court: (c) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Ss. 84 to 87‑Bar con tained in S. 86 applies not only to foreign Rulers, ambassadors and envoys but to foreign State itself ‑ Provisions of Ss. 34 :0 87 supersede rules of International Law‑Suit against foreign State not maintainable without consent of Central Government‑Gammon‑Layton v. Secretary of State, U. S. A. P L U 1965 Kar. 425 dissented from.2002 C L D 790
SGS SOCIETE GENERALE ‑‑‑Appellant Versus PAKISTANI‑‑Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 2024 Islamabad 231
RAHIL AZIZI — Petitioner Versus The STATE and 5 others — Respondents
Court: High Court