Home Maxims & Terms International Law meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

International Law

International Law legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2025 PLD 274 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Foreign judgmentScope

Foreign judgment is given recognition in International law on the basis of principle of reciprocity and comity that gives rise to rights and obligations.

2023 PLD 19 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
International Human rightsTreaties ratified by PakistanEffect

General rule is that the provisions of a treaty are not automatically incorporated into the municipal law and a country's legislature must pass legislation to implement them

High Court observed that courts in Pakistan are required to interpret and apply every statute, so far as its language admits, in accordance with the principle of comity of nations and the recognized norms of international law, even in situations where no such law has been enacted.

2023 CLC 744 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent

International law unless in direct conflict with municipal law ought to be applied and respected by municipal courts in deciding matters arising therefrom.

2022 PLD 36 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
Religious minorities, protection of

Every State was duty bound to take necessary measures to ensure that the persons belonging to minorities may exercise fully/effectively all their human rights and fundamental freedoms without any discrimination and in full equality before law

States were required to create favourable conditions to enable minorities to express their characteristics and to develop their culture, language, religion, traditions and customs, except where specific practices were in violation of national law and contrary to international standards.

2022 PLD 39 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Arts. 14 & 25International lawDignity of girls/womenDuty of StateScope

State, due to its commitments under International Law, has the duty/obligation to ensure dignity of a girl/woman.

2022 PLC(CS) 1523 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Municipal lawInternational lawScope

General rule is that the provisions of a treaty are not automatically incorporated into municipal law and a country's legislature must enact law to implement them

In Pakistan, even where such legislation has not been passed, the courts are required to interpret and apply every statute, as far as its language admits, in accordance with the principles of comity of nations and established rules of international law.

2021 PLD 305 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1949), Art. 15Right to nationalityPerson once registered as a citizen cannot be deprived of citizenship otherwise than as is provided under the law

Article 15 of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights declares that everyone has the right of nationality.

2016 PLD 421 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
International treaties and Conventions

Enforceable domestically (in a country) only if incorporated in the municipal law (of that country).

2014 PLD 199 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Conflict with municipal lawEffect

International law unless in direct conflict with municipal law, ought to be applied and respected by municipal courts in deciding matters arising therefrom.

2014 PLD 10 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
ExtraditionSovereignty of StatesScope

There is no international obligation upon sovereign State to accept request for extradition of a person within its territorial jurisdiction

Sovereignty of a State has legal authority over people within its territorial borders

Host State has to enter into arrangements with other sovereign States, whereby it may divest some of its sovereign powers including power to try a person for offence or to allow that person to remain within its territorial jurisdiction and to allow his extradition to other State to face trial.

2014 PLD 10 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent
Municipal laws

When international obligations and bilateral commitments come in conflict with municipal laws, the latter are to prevail.

2013 PLD 641 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Contract

Where a contract is entered into with a foreign national or a foreign company, it is governed by the municipal laws of the country where the contract is executed subject to any special provision to the contrary incorporated in the contract.

2010 PLC(CS) 1280 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Customs and practices

Long-standing practices and customs, in absence of express statutory provisions, would be regarded as an essential source of law

Principles stated.

2007 PLD 300 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Judicial comity, principle ofApplicabilityPakistan is not a pariah, rather a responsible State and is a part of civilized community of NationsJudiciary of Pakistan is fully established and institutionalized and is one of the most important organs of the State

Interaction of a State as a whole with other Nations undoubtedly is based upon mutual respect and confidence and this stands true for the judicial organ as well

When world has squeezed into a global village, it has become expedient that principles of comity should be strictly applied, adhered and resorted to all levels of the State institutions

Upon such principle, Court of one jurisdiction, subject to condition that orders do not contravene any domestic law of country should give the effect to judicial decisions of Courts of another State, as a matter of deference and mutual respect, even if no obligation exists to do so

It should be based upon willingness on part of judiciary of one civilized State to grant privilege and respect to orders of foreign jurisdiction-It is the matter of mutual accommodation, shown to the orders of each other, especially which are passed in proper exercise of jurisdiction

Such respect is founded and structured upon rules of courtesy, civility, affability, amity, consideration, gesture of goodwill and good fellowship to the orders passed by the Court of other country.

1993 SCMR 1406 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
International LawRecognition of Bangladesh as an independent State by Pakistan

Implications.

1993 PLD 93 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Conflict between rules of International Law and Acts of ParliamentEffect

Rules of International Law should be accommodated in the Municipal 'Law even without express legislative sanction provided they do not run into conflict with Acts of Parliament

Doctrine of incorporation

Connotation

Obligation of Courts in cases of conflict between the International Law and the Municipal Law.

1989 PTD 582 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
ContractAgreement provided the liability of agent to pay technical fee to parent company in terms of U.S. DollarsPlace of payment had not been mentioned in the agreementDebtor, held, must seek the creditor and payment should be made at the place of business of the parent company

Agent should spend Pakistan rupees for obtaining the determined and ascertained amount of dollars for payment to the parent company even in case of devaluation of Pakistan currency meanwhile.

1989 PTD 178 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

When a country recognizes a new State it relates back retrospectively to the date when the new State was created.

1988 PLD 99 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Pakistani Courts are not entitled to take note of the factum of violation of any provision of International agreement or law, in the absence of any provision in the relevant law??Courts in Pakistan are bound to give effect to the municipal laws as they are.

1986 PLD 171 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Jurisdiction- Personal jurisdiction or jurisdiction over parties when lies-Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 20 (c).-[Jurisdiction].

1981 PLD 377 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Treaty between Pakistan Government and U. S. S. R.-Words and pbrases

Words "due fulfilment" occurring in treaty-Treaty containing a clause making Trade Representation responsible for "due fulfilment" of contract

Words "due fulfillment of contract"-Held, mean fulfilment of part of their obligation undertaken by them voluntarily or by execution through courts of lex situs, i. e., Pakistan Courts Such interpretation consistent with Articles 4 to 7 of Statute concerning trade mission and trade agencies of U. S. S. R.. abroad.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "International Law", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2865

Precedents & Case Laws citing "International Law"

PLD 1993
C. P. No.D‑529 of 1990, heard on 9th September, 1992.

P L D 1993 Karachi 93

Messrs NAJIB ZARAB LIMITED‑‑Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through the Secretary

Court:
MLD 2021
2021-March-25

2021 M L D 1559

AQIB JAVED and another — Petitioners Versus HIGHER EDUCATION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN and 7 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
PLD 1965
Suit No. 17 of 1964, decided on 1st February 1965.

P L D 1965 (W

MESSRS GAMMON LAYTON, KARACHI‑-Plaintiff Versus SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE UNITED STATES

Court:
PLD 1981
Civil Appeal No. K‑25 of 1970, decided on 8th July, 1981.

P L D 1981 Supreme Court 377

A. M. QURESHI‑Appellant Versus UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS AND ANOTHER‑

Court:
PLD 2016
2015-December-16

P L D 2016 Supreme Court 174

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN (DECEASED) through L.Rs. and others — Appellants Versus NASREEN FIRDOUS and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1952
1952-June-4

P L D 1952 Federal Court 120

HER HIGHNESS MUNAWAR JAHAN BEGUM OF JUNAGADH‑Appellant Versus CROWN‑Respondent

Court: High Court
CLC 1998
Civil Appeal No. 46 of 1997, decided on 4th November, 1997.

1998 C L C 534

Miss SHAHIDA BANG‑‑‑Appellant Versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR

Court: Supreme Court (AJ&K)
PLD 1968
Civil Suit No. 115 of 1966, decided on 22nd January, 1968.

P L D 1968 Karachi 443

A. M. QUERSHI‑Plaintiff Versus UNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICS Through

Court: (c) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Ss. 84 to 87‑Bar con tained in S. 86 applies not only to foreign Rulers, ambassadors and envoys but to foreign State itself ‑ Provisions of Ss. 34 :0 87 supersede rules of International Law‑Suit against foreign State not maintainable without consent of Central Government‑Gammon‑Layton v. Secretary of State, U. S. A. P L U 1965 Kar. 425 dissented from.
CLD 2002
First Appeal from Order 9 of 2002, heard on 14th February, 2002.

2002 C L D 790

SGS SOCIETE GENERALE ‑‑‑Appellant Versus PAKISTANI‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 2024
2023-June-19

P L D 2024 Islamabad 231

RAHIL AZIZI — Petitioner Versus The STATE and 5 others — Respondents

Court: High Court