Islamic State
Islamic State legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
State was bound to exercise its power and authority within the limits prescribed by the Injunctions of Islam, through the chosen representatives of the people
State in performance of its obligation had to legislate for maintaining law and order situation in all circumstances and had to resort to various measures including promulgation of laws for protection of life, honour and property of the citizens.
Not un-Islamic.
"Islamic State", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/2913
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Islamic State"
1992 M L D 345
THE STATE‑‑‑Appellant Versus GULZAR MUHAMMAD and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2006 Karachi 93
MUHAMMAD YAMIN KHAN — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through CHAIRMAN MINISTRY OF RAILWAY, ISLAMABAD and 3 others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2017 Federal Shariat Court 1
Dr. MUHAMMAD ASLAM KHAKI — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through President of Pakistan and another — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 2019 Islamabad 62
Mulana ALLAH WASAYA and others — Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Law and Justice and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1981 F S C 139
BHAI KHAN AND 4 OTHERS-Petitioners Versus FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS-Respondents
Court: High Court1998 P Cr
Haji NOOR HASSAN ‑‑‑Petitioner Versus KHALID MASOOD, INSPECTOR/S.H.O., POLICE STATION "B" DIVISION, RAHIMYAR KHAN‑‑‑Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 1993 Supreme Court 445
J.J.K. TAJJAK ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus GON~ERNMENT OF BAWCHISTAN and another‑l‑Respondents
Court:P L D 1997 Lahore 434
Dr. HAMEED AHMAD AYAZ‑‑‑Petitioner, Versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB‑‑‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑‑‑First Sched., Art. 1 as amended by Punjab Finance Act (V of 1996), S.2‑‑ Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts. 199, ~10, 37(d), 2A, 227 & 203GG ‑‑ Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Arts.8 & 10‑‑‑European Convention of Human Rights, Preamble‑ ‑‑Constitutional petition ‑‑‑Vires of S.2, Punjab Finance Act, 1996 whereby Art. 1 of the First Sched. of the Court Fees Act, 1870 was amended so as to enhance the rate of court‑fee from Rs.7.50 per cent. to 8.50 per cent. and the maximum limit from Rs.15,000 to Rs.34,000‑‑ Held, demand for court‑fee was wholly foreign to and militated against the Islamic Injunctions‑‑‑If a citizen was prevented from approaching a Court of law on account of his inability to pay the court‑fee, command of God and Holy Prophet stood violated‑‑‑Enhancement in the rate of court‑fee was also violative of Art.37(d) of the Constitution of Pakistan‑‑‑High Court, in circumstances, issued directions to regulate its working and procedure and so also of the Courts subordinate to it. .2005 C L C 1179
GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. through Secretary C&W and others — Petitioners Versus REHMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY — Respondent
Court: Peshawar