Legislation by Reference
Legislation by Reference legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Any Legislation whereby certain provisions of a section in a statute were incorporated into another; was generally known as Legislation by reference
Effect of such incorporation by reference to a provision of a statute was as if a new statute/provision(s) had come into force containing those provisions subject to such modification and alteration, if any, as made by or indicated in adopting statute
Where Legislation was by reference, and specific provisions from an Act or section(s) were incorporated into another provision , such provisions would operate as if they had been specifically been penned in the referring section or provision, meaning thereby that they operated independently from the Act or section from which they had been taken
Where there was specific legislation by reference; any amendment or repeal of the borrowed statute/provision did not affect the provisions/statute in which the same were incorporated.
Legislation by referential incorporation fell into two categories; first, where a statute by specific reference incorporated the provisions of another statute as of the time of adoption; second, where a statute incorporated by general reference the law concerning a particular subject as a genus
In the case of former category, the subsequent amendment made in the referred statute could not automatically be read into the adoption statute
In the case of latter category, it might be presumed that the legislative intent was to include all the subsequent amendments also made from time to time in the general law on the subject adopted by general reference.
Statute which referred to law of a subject generally adopted the law on the subject as of the time the law was invoked; and this would include all the amendments and modifications of the law subsequent to the time the reference/statute was enacted.
Section 6 of Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan (Reorganization and Conversion) Ordinance, 2002 was an instance of legislation by reference.
Promotion of employees in service of Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan (Bank) prior to the promulgation of Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan (Reorganization and Conversion) Ordinance, 2002
Promotion Committee of Bank not recommending promotion of such employees on the basis that they failed to meet the threshold required for promotion under the applicable Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited Staff Regulations, 2005, and that their promotion was not governed by the Agricultural Development Bank (Staff Service) Regulations, 1961 or by Promotion Policy, 1999
Employees challenged recommendations of Promotion Committee by filing constitutional petition before High Court claiming that their promotion was governed by Agricultural Development Bank (Staff Service) Regulations, 1961 and Promotion Policy, 1999 and not by the Regulations of 2005
Maintainability
Contention of Bank was that even if employees in question were governed by Agricultural Development Bank (Staff Service) Regulations, 1961 and Promotion Policy, 1999, the same were non-statutory, therefore, constitutional petition would not be maintainable
Validity
Section 6 of Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan (Reorganization and Conversion) Ordinance, 2002 provided two fold security to employees who were in service of the Bank prior to the promulgation of the said Ordinance: Firstly the employees of the Bank, prior to promulgation of said Ordinance, stood transferred and became employees of the Company, and secondly they were made subject to the same rules and regulations as were applicable to them before the promulgation of the said Ordinance
On account of S.6 of the said Ordinance, the previous Regulations relating to promotion of employees in question, i.e. Agricultural Development Bank (Staff Service) Regulations, 1961 and Promotion Policy, 1999, which were non-statutory, stood incorporated by way of legislative reference and thereby acquired a statutory status under the new dispensation and the employees acquired a legal right for their enforcement
Constitutional petition before High Court, filed against recommendations of Promotion Committee, would be maintainable in such circumstances
Appeal filed by Bank was dismissed accordingly.
Statute which referred to law of a subject generally adopted the law on the subject as of the time the law was invoked; and this would include all the amendments and modifications of the law subsequent to the time the reference/statute was enacted.
Legislation by referential incorporation fell into two categories; first, where a statute by specific reference incorporated the provisions of another statute as of the time of adoption; second, where a statute incorporated by general reference the law concerning a particular subject as a genus
In the case of former category, the subsequent amendment made in the referred statute could not automatically be read into the adoption statute
In the case of latter category, it might be presumed that the legislative intent was to include all the subsequent amendments also made from time to time in the general law on the subject adopted by general reference.
Promotion of employees in service of Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan ("Bank") prior to the promulgation of Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan (Re-organization and Conversion) Ordinance, 2002
Promotion Committee of Bank not recommending promotion of such employees on the basis that they failed to meet the threshold required for promotion under the applicable Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited Staff Regulations, 2005, and that their promotion was not governed by the Agricultural Development Bank (Staff Service) Regulations, 1961 or by Promotion Policy, 1999
Employees challenged recommendations of Promotion Committee by filing constitutional petition before High Court claiming that their promotion was governed by Agricultural Development Bank (Staff Service) Regulations, 1961 and Promotion Policy, 1999 and not by the Regulations of 2005
Maintainability
Contention of Bank was that even if employees in question were governed by Agricultural Development Bank (Staff Service) Regulations, 1961 and Promotion Policy, 1999, the same were non-statutory, therefore, constitutional petition would not be maintainable
Validity
Section 6 of Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan (Re-organization and Conversion) Ordinance, 2002 provided two fold security to employees who were in service of the Bank prior to the promulgation of the said Ordinance: Firstly the employees of the Bank, prior to promulgation of said Ordinance, stood transferred and became employees of the Company, and secondly they were made subject to the same rules and regulations as were applicable to them before the promulgation of the said Ordinance
On account of S.6 of the said Ordinance, the previous Regulations relating to promotion of employees in question, i.e. Agricultural Development Bank (Staff Service) Regulations, 1961 and Promotion Policy, 1999, which were non-statutory, stood incorporated by way of legislative reference and thereby acquired a statutory status under the new dispensation and the employees acquired a legal right for their enforcement
Constitutional petition before High Court, filed against recommendations of Promotion Committee, would be maintainable in such circumstances
Appeal filed by Bank was dismissed accordingly.
Import, working and application of the doctrine explained.
Effect of adoption of one statute by another by reference is same as if adopted statute had been written into adopting statute
Such incorporation is meant to avoid necessity of repeating such provisions in subsequent Act dealing with same matter
Effect of incorporation by reference to the provisions of a former Act is as if new Act has come into force containing all those provisions subject to such modification and alterations, if any, as may be indicated in adopting Act.
"Legislation by Reference", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3007
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Legislation by Reference"
2005 P L C 74
MUHAMMAD ALI. MALIK Versus WORKMAN COMMISSIONER/WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION AND AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF WAGES ACT, 1936 arid 2 others
Court: Lahore High Court2015 C L D 899
EHSAN ULLAH QURESHI — Appellant Versus UNITED BANK LIMITED — Respondent
Court: IslamabadP L D 1980 Lahore 509
ABDUL RASHID-Petitioner Versus ADMINISTRATOR; MARKET COMMITTEE, OKARA
Court: Art. 199 read with Punjab Agricultural Produce Market (General) Rules, 1979, r. 70(6) and Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1973), S. 12(ii)-Writ-Certiorari-Legislation by reference-Applicable only to extent of reference and not beyond-Term "rules" as used in r. 70(6) could attract only rules as concern service conditions. including disciplinary matters and others but not thing either not contained in rules or only available in Act-Legislature if it intended to use entire package of laws and rules governing civil servants could use word "law" instead of "rules"-Market Committee being a body corporate, its employees a category apart and, held, could only be governed by rules specifically applicable to them-Section 12(ii), hence, held further, not applicable to employees of Market Committees.-Civil service.1978 P L C 95
HAROON SAAD Versus PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER
Court: LahoreP L D 2003 Lahore 730
Mst. NARGIS MOEEN and another — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Defence, Islamabad and another — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1964 Supreme Court 434
THE STATE‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD RIAZ‑UL‑HAQ‑Respondent
Court:1971 S C M R 145
MAULA BAKHSH‑Petitioner Versus ABDUL HAMID AND 4 OTHERS‑Respondents
Court: High Court1981 P L C 898
SECURITY PAPERS LTD. Versus SIND LABOUR COURT No. IV AND ANOTHER
Court: Karachi High Court1998 P T D 358
SHREE JANKKI SOLVENT EXTRACTIONS LTD. and 2 others Versus DEPUTY DIRLCTOR OF INCOME-TAX (INVESTIGATION) and others
Court: 221 ITR 301980 C L C 1
MUHAMMAD KHAN — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD SARFARAZ KHAN -Ex. — Respondents
Court: Lahore