Home Maxims & Terms Legislation by Reference meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Legislation by Reference

Legislation by Reference legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2015 CLD 899 ISLAMABAD Judicial Precedent
Legislation by referenceMeaning, object and scopeIndependence of provisionsInterpretation of Legislation by reference

Any Legislation whereby certain provisions of a section in a statute were incorporated into another; was generally known as Legislation by reference

Effect of such incorporation by reference to a provision of a statute was as if a new statute/provision(s) had come into force containing those provisions subject to such modification and alteration, if any, as made by or indicated in adopting statute

Where Legislation was by reference, and specific provisions from an Act or section(s) were incorporated into another provision , such provisions would operate as if they had been specifically been penned in the referring section or provision, meaning thereby that they operated independently from the Act or section from which they had been taken

Where there was specific legislation by reference; any amendment or repeal of the borrowed statute/provision did not affect the provisions/statute in which the same were incorporated.

2013 SCMR 642 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Legislation by referenceScope

Legislation by referential incorporation fell into two categories; first, where a statute by specific reference incorporated the provisions of another statute as of the time of adoption; second, where a statute incorporated by general reference the law concerning a particular subject as a genus

In the case of former category, the subsequent amendment made in the referred statute could not automatically be read into the adoption statute

In the case of latter category, it might be presumed that the legislative intent was to include all the subsequent amendments also made from time to time in the general law on the subject adopted by general reference.

2013 SCMR 642 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Legislation by referenceScope

Statute which referred to law of a subject generally adopted the law on the subject as of the time the law was invoked; and this would include all the amendments and modifications of the law subsequent to the time the reference/statute was enacted.

2013 SCMR 642 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 6Legislation by referenceScope

Section 6 of Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan (Reorganization and Conversion) Ordinance, 2002 was an instance of legislation by reference.

2013 SCMR 642 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 6Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited Staff Regulations, 2005Agricultural Development Bank (Staff Service) Regulations, 1961Promotion Policy, 1999Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199Legislation by referenceScopeBank employee

Promotion of employees in service of Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan (Bank) prior to the promulgation of Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan (Reorganization and Conversion) Ordinance, 2002

Promotion Committee of Bank not recommending promotion of such employees on the basis that they failed to meet the threshold required for promotion under the applicable Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited Staff Regulations, 2005, and that their promotion was not governed by the Agricultural Development Bank (Staff Service) Regulations, 1961 or by Promotion Policy, 1999

Employees challenged recommendations of Promotion Committee by filing constitutional petition before High Court claiming that their promotion was governed by Agricultural Development Bank (Staff Service) Regulations, 1961 and Promotion Policy, 1999 and not by the Regulations of 2005

Maintainability

Contention of Bank was that even if employees in question were governed by Agricultural Development Bank (Staff Service) Regulations, 1961 and Promotion Policy, 1999, the same were non-statutory, therefore, constitutional petition would not be maintainable

Validity

Section 6 of Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan (Reorganization and Conversion) Ordinance, 2002 provided two fold security to employees who were in service of the Bank prior to the promulgation of the said Ordinance: Firstly the employees of the Bank, prior to promulgation of said Ordinance, stood transferred and became employees of the Company, and secondly they were made subject to the same rules and regulations as were applicable to them before the promulgation of the said Ordinance

On account of S.6 of the said Ordinance, the previous Regulations relating to promotion of employees in question, i.e. Agricultural Development Bank (Staff Service) Regulations, 1961 and Promotion Policy, 1999, which were non-statutory, stood incorporated by way of legislative reference and thereby acquired a statutory status under the new dispensation and the employees acquired a legal right for their enforcement

Constitutional petition before High Court, filed against recommendations of Promotion Committee, would be maintainable in such circumstances

Appeal filed by Bank was dismissed accordingly.

2013 PLC(CS) 1223 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Legislation by referenceScope

Statute which referred to law of a subject generally adopted the law on the subject as of the time the law was invoked; and this would include all the amendments and modifications of the law subsequent to the time the reference/statute was enacted.

2013 PLC(CS) 1223 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Legislation by referenceScope

Legislation by referential incorporation fell into two categories; first, where a statute by specific reference incorporated the provisions of another statute as of the time of adoption; second, where a statute incorporated by general reference the law concerning a particular subject as a genus

In the case of former category, the subsequent amendment made in the referred statute could not automatically be read into the adoption statute

In the case of latter category, it might be presumed that the legislative intent was to include all the subsequent amendments also made from time to time in the general law on the subject adopted by general reference.

2013 PLC(CS) 1223 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 6Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited Staff Regulations, 2005Agricultural Development Bank (Staff Service) Regulations, 1961Promotion Policy, 1999Constitution of Pakistan, Art. 199Legislation by referenceScopeBank employee

Promotion of employees in service of Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan ("Bank") prior to the promulgation of Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan (Re-organization and Conversion) Ordinance, 2002

Promotion Committee of Bank not recommending promotion of such employees on the basis that they failed to meet the threshold required for promotion under the applicable Zarai Taraqiati Bank Limited Staff Regulations, 2005, and that their promotion was not governed by the Agricultural Development Bank (Staff Service) Regulations, 1961 or by Promotion Policy, 1999

Employees challenged recommendations of Promotion Committee by filing constitutional petition before High Court claiming that their promotion was governed by Agricultural Development Bank (Staff Service) Regulations, 1961 and Promotion Policy, 1999 and not by the Regulations of 2005

Maintainability

Contention of Bank was that even if employees in question were governed by Agricultural Development Bank (Staff Service) Regulations, 1961 and Promotion Policy, 1999, the same were non-statutory, therefore, constitutional petition would not be maintainable

Validity

Section 6 of Agricultural Development Bank of Pakistan (Re-organization and Conversion) Ordinance, 2002 provided two fold security to employees who were in service of the Bank prior to the promulgation of the said Ordinance: Firstly the employees of the Bank, prior to promulgation of said Ordinance, stood transferred and became employees of the Company, and secondly they were made subject to the same rules and regulations as were applicable to them before the promulgation of the said Ordinance

On account of S.6 of the said Ordinance, the previous Regulations relating to promotion of employees in question, i.e. Agricultural Development Bank (Staff Service) Regulations, 1961 and Promotion Policy, 1999, which were non-statutory, stood incorporated by way of legislative reference and thereby acquired a statutory status under the new dispensation and the employees acquired a legal right for their enforcement

Constitutional petition before High Court, filed against recommendations of Promotion Committee, would be maintainable in such circumstances

Appeal filed by Bank was dismissed accordingly.

1995 PLD 12 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent
Legislation by Reference Doctrine of

Import, working and application of the doctrine explained.

1985 SCMR 707 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Legislation by reference

Effect of adoption of one statute by another by reference is same as if adopted statute had been written into adopting statute

Such incorporation is meant to avoid necessity of repeating such provisions in subsequent Act dealing with same matter

Effect of incorporation by reference to the provisions of a former Act is as if new Act has come into force containing all those provisions subject to such modification and alterations, if any, as may be indicated in adopting Act.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Legislation by Reference", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3007

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Legislation by Reference"

PLC 2005
W. Ps. Nos. 14999 to 15012 of 2004, decided on 16th September, 2004.

2005 P L C 74

MUHAMMAD ALI. MALIK Versus WORKMAN COMMISSIONER/WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION AND AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF WAGES ACT, 1936 arid 2 others

Court: Lahore High Court
CLD 2015
2015-March-31

2015 C L D 899

EHSAN ULLAH QURESHI — Appellant Versus UNITED BANK LIMITED — Respondent

Court: Islamabad
PLD 1980
Writ Petition No. 1078/S of 1980, decided on 6th April, 1980.

P L D 1980 Lahore 509

ABDUL RASHID-Petitioner Versus ADMINISTRATOR; MARKET COMMITTEE, OKARA

Court: Art. 199 read with Punjab Agricultural Produce Market (General) Rules, 1979, r. 70(6) and Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1973), S. 12(ii)-Writ-Certiorari-Legislation by reference-Applicable only to extent of reference and not beyond-Term "rules" as used in r. 70(6) could attract only rules as concern service conditions. including disciplinary matters and others but not thing either not contained in rules or only available in Act-Legislature if it intended to use entire package of laws and rules governing civil servants could use word "law" instead of "rules"-Market Committee being a body corporate, its employees a category apart and, held, could only be governed by rules specifically applicable to them-Section 12(ii), hence, held further, not applicable to employees of Market Committees.-Civil service.
PLC 1978
Writ Petition No. 1832/S of 1974, decided on 10th October 1974.

1978 P L C 95

HAROON SAAD Versus PAKISTAN AND ANOTHER

Court: Lahore
PLD 2003
N/A

P L D 2003 Lahore 730

Mst. NARGIS MOEEN and another — Petitioners Versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Defence, Islamabad and another — Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1964
Criminal Appeal No. 13 of 1964, decided on 6th April 1964.

P L D 1964 Supreme Court 434

THE STATE‑Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD RIAZ‑UL‑HAQ‑Respondent

Court:
SCMR 1971
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 293 of 1970, decided on 8th January 1971.

1971 S C M R 145

MAULA BAKHSH‑Petitioner Versus ABDUL HAMID AND 4 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court: High Court
PLC 1981
Constitutional Petition No. S‑94 of 1980, decided on 18th December, 1980.

1981 P L C 898

SECURITY PAPERS LTD. Versus SIND LABOUR COURT No. IV AND ANOTHER

Court: Karachi High Court
PTD 1998
Civil Miscellaneous/Writ Petitions Nos.189 190 and 192 of 1995, decided on 14th November, 1995.

1998 P T D 358

SHREE JANKKI SOLVENT EXTRACTIONS LTD. and 2 others Versus DEPUTY DIRLCTOR OF INCOME-TAX (INVESTIGATION) and others

Court: 221 ITR 30
CLC 1980
Writ Petition No. 5019 of 1979; decided on 1st October, 1979.

1980 C L C 1

MUHAMMAD KHAN — Appellant Versus MUHAMMAD SARFARAZ KHAN -Ex. — Respondents

Court: Lahore