Fiat Justitia, Ruat Coelum
Fiat Justitia, Ruat Coelum legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Applicability.
"Fiat justitia, ruat coelum": Let justice be done, though the heavens should fall??Origin and application of the maxim.
"Fiat Justitia, Ruat Coelum", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3132
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Fiat Justitia, Ruat Coelum"
P L D 2005 Supreme Court 270
THE STATE through National Accountability Bureau, Islamabad‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Haji NASIM‑UR‑REHMAN‑‑‑Respondent
Court:2016 M L D 1956
Mst. NUSRAT JAN — Petitioner Versus ASGHAR KHAN and 5 others — Respondents
Court: Lahore (Rawalpindi Bench)2016 C L D 1697
MUHAMMAD SOHAIL TABBA — Appellant Versus DIRECTOR ENFORCEMENT, SECP — Respondent
Court: Securities and Exchange Commission of Pakistan1995 M L D 1903
KANWAR INTIZAR MUHAMMAD KHAN, ADVOCATE‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Federal Secretariat, Islamabad and 6 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Lahore2004 Y L R 1680
Mst. KUSH NIAZ Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary Ministry of Interior and another ‑‑‑Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2016 Balochistan 56
TAHIR HUMAYUN and others — Appellants Versus HIGH COURT OF BALOCHISTAN through Registrar and others — Respondents
Court: High Court1998 C L C 1285
FISHERMEN'S COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED and 7 others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus THE REGISTRAR, COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES, SINDH, HYDERABAD and 3 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Karachi2003 Y L R 3021
MUHAMMAD ASLAM MUJAHID‑‑‑Petitioner Versus MAHMOOD AHMED QURESHI and 9 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Election Tribunal Sindh2003 Y L R 2878
MUHAMMAD ASLAM MUJAHID — Petitioner Versus MAHMOOD AHMED QURESHI and 9 others — Respondents
Court: Election Tribunal SindhP L D 1989 Supreme Court 166
and others?Appellants Versus Haji? MUHAMMAD SAIFULLAH KHAN and others‑‑Respondents
Court: (i)???? "The validity of the election of the President shall not be called in question by or before any Court or other authority." Article 41(6).