Nemo Debet Esse Judex in Propria Sua Causa
Nemo Debet Esse Judex in Propria Sua Causa legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Provision of S.403, Cr.P.C. is based on the Latin maxim Nemo debet bis vexari pro una et eadem causa (no person should be twice disturbed for the same cause) which has led to the development of two common law principles of equity, namely, autre fois acquit (acquitted formally) and autre fois convict (convicted formally).
Nemo Debet Esse Judex in Propria Sua Causa Nemo debet esse judex in propria sue cause" and "nemo sibi esse judex vel suis jus decere debet"
Connotation
It is fundamental principle in the administration of justice in the civilized world that a person cannot be a judge in a cause wherein he is interested.
Connotation.
"Nemo debet esse judex in propria sua causa" (No man to be his own judge and litigant)??Where the judge has interest in the result of a cause, he cannot sit in judgment upon it??Where a person was an interested party, being an applicant for the allotment of land, his association in the allotment committee and participation in decision making, disqualified him to be member/Chairman of that Committee for the purpose of deciding his own application??Such person thus cannot be permitted to take advantage of allotment made in his favour by Allotment Committee in which he participated.
Maxim- Nemo debet esse judex in propria causa (no one can be a Judge it; his own cause) Doctrine of bias-Important principle of natural justice
Maxim" Justice should not only be done but manifestly seem to be done "Maxims apply do judicial or quasi judicial tribunals as well as administrative authorities performing quasi judicial functions but not functions "purely administrative or procedural in character" Natural justice
Principles apply unless otherwise provided by a statute.
(e) Maxim: Nemo debet esse judex in propria causa (No one shall be a judge in his own cause)-Applies with full force to departmental inquiries where orders have to be passed to disadvantage of functionaries of State.
S. 3 (5) (al [as amended by West Pakistan Maintenance of Public Order (Amendment) Ordinance (XLVII of 1962)],-Officer (Home Secretary) dealing with case of detention on behalf of Government-Cannot be member of Board-Maxim: Nemo debet esse judex in propria causa (no one can be a judge in his own cause).
"Nemo Debet Esse Judex in Propria Sua Causa", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3140
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Nemo Debet Esse Judex in Propria Sua Causa"
2020 P Cr
HABIB HASSAN — Appellant Versus The STATE — Respondent
Court: Peshawar1988 S C M R 173
AKHUNZADA BEHRAWAR SAEED, ADVOCATE SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN‑‑‑Petitioner Versus Mr. Justice SAJJAD ALI SHAH, CHIEF JUSTICE OF PAKISTAN and 2 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2022 P L C (C
SHAHERYAR GUL Versus The GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA through Principal Secretary to Governor Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Peshawar and others
Court: Peshawar High CourtP L D 1989 Lahore 26
Lt.‑Col. NAFIS‑UD‑DIN ANSARI‑‑Petitioner Versus Qazi HABIB ULLAH and another‑‑Respondents
Court: (b) West Pakistan Border Area Regulation, 1959 M.L.R.9‑‑2003 S C M R 104
GOVERNMENT OF N.‑W.F.P through Chief Secretary and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus Dr. HUSSAIN AHMAD HAROON and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2018 C L C 1578
GHULAM ALI — Applicant Versus DOST MUHAMMAD — Respondent
Court: Sindh (Hyderabad Bench)2019 C L C 1384
RASHID — Applicant Versus Mst. FARAH NAZ — Respondent
Court: Sindh (Hyderabad Bench)2018 M L D 1438
MUHAMMAD WARIAL — Applicant Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH through DC and 5 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh (Hyderabad Bench)2015 Y L R 544
HASSAN ALI GONDAL and others — Petitioners Versus Messrs KARIM ENTERPRISES — Respondent
Court: LahoreP L D 2002 Karachi 131
M. ADIL HAYAT KHAN — Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH and others — Respondents
Court: High Court