O & M Establishment Manual Vol. I
O & M Establishment Manual Vol. I legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Ss. 8 (4) & 22 -Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), S. 4Service Tribunal (Procedure) Rules, 1974, Rr. 6 (e) & 13 (2)Constitution of Pakistan (1962), Arts. 32 (b) & 178 (2)-Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 99 (3)-Rules of Business, 1962, R. 10-Rules of Business, 1973, Rr. 7 & 11-Estacode (1983 Edition, p. 150) - O & M Establishment Manual, Vol. I, p. 54-Seniority-Promotion -Pakistan Audit Department found to have been maintaining two separate seniority lists, one for Selection Grade Clerks (later designated as Audit Assistants) and other a combined seniority list of Upper Division Clerks (later known as Auditors) and Selection Grade Clerks so that seniority of such civil servant could be materially different in two lists-Reason for maintaining such seniority lists was that in combined seniority list seniority counted from date of entry in cadre of U. D. Cs. and remained intact notwithstanding promotion in Selection Grade Second list of Selection Grade Clerks was of those U. D. Cs.
"O & M Establishment Manual Vol. I", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3203
Precedents & Case Laws citing "O & M Establishment Manual Vol. I"
1983 S C M R 765
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN-Appellant Versus Haji AHMAD JAN AND OTHERS-Respondents
Court: -- Art. 212 read with O. & M. Establishment Manual, Vol. I (1968 Edition), pp. 389 & 390-Civil service-Terms "Department" and "deputation allowance"-Connotation-Grant of deputation allowance to a Provincial Government Servant-Held, depends on terms of his transfer - Provincial Government servant on deputation of Central Government Office appointed to higher post - Held, eligible for deputation allowance - Decision of Service Tribunal granting deputation allowance to respondent civil servant upheld.-Words and phrases.1991 S C M R 209
Malik AZHARUL HAQ‑‑Appellant Versus DIRECTOR OF FOOD, PUNJAB, LAHORE and another‑‑Respondents
Court: High Court1986 P L C (C
MUHAMMAD ISMAIL Versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF THE
Court: High CourtP L D 1973 Supreme Court 497
MUHAMMAD SHARIF‑Petitioner Versus THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, BASIC DEMOCRACIES, SOCIAL WELFARE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, LAHORE AND 3 OTHES‑Respondents
Court:1998 P L C (C
MOINUDDIN AHMAD Versus THE CHAIRMAN, F.P.S.C., ISLAMABAD and others
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1998 SC M R 1389
MOINUDDIN AHMAD‑‑‑Petitioner Versus THE CHAIRMAN, F.P.S.C., ISLAMABAD and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan,P L D 1955 Sind 200
NOORUL HASSAN‑ — Plaintiff Versus THE FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN — ‑Defendants
Court:P L D 1982 Karachi 913
REHMAT ALI‑Petitioner Versus THE SECURITY PAPERS LTD. AND ANOTHER‑Respondents
Court: S------2(xxviii) read with West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968), S. 2(1)‑ "Worker and workman"‑Difference‑Definition of worker and work man given in Industrial Relations Ordinance, held, much wider in its scope as compared to definition given in Standing Orders Ordinance (VI of 1968).‑Interpretation of statutes.P L D 1973 Lahore 594
BASHIR A. MALIK‑Petitioner Versus THS PUNJAB LABOUR COURT (NORTHERN
Court:1986 P L C 1148
PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, MULTAN Versus ZUMURAD HUSSAIN SHAH
Court: Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab