Obiter Dicta
Obiter Dicta legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Decisions of Supreme Court are binding on all the courts subordinate to it when they decide the question of law and enunciate the principles of law
Even the obiter dicta of the Supreme Court is of greater value.
Any observation by Supreme Court even when obiter, is binding on High Court.
Rest, if any, is obiter and obiter except of Supreme Court, or before it, of the Privy Council, is not/has not been binding.
Obiter Dicta Obiter dicta of the Supreme Court was binding.
[Ratio decidendi].
Court answering first question in negative, and second question not requiring any finding-Observations made on second question-Obiter dicta.
Opinion given on some point not necessary for decision of case -.Does not lay down law to be followed.
Obiter Dicta Observations of the nature of, by superior Court?Pot binding in every case on subordinate Courts.
"Obiter Dicta", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3209
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Obiter Dicta"
2001 P T D 833
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX Versus KANJI SHIVJI & CO.
Court: 242 I T R 1242021 P T D 80
MUHAMMAD ZAHID, PROPRIETOR PLUS ENTERPRISES Versus FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairperson, Islamabad and 5 others
Court: Lahore High Court (Multan Bench)2022 C L C 1188
AYESHA SAJID — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Finance Secretary and 3 others — Respondents
Court: LahoreP L D 2004 Supreme Court 600
ALL PAKISTAN NEWSPAPERS SOCIETY and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHARY, J.‑‑‑Above noted petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 184(3) of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan hereinafter referred to as the Constitution.2012 C L D 218
Messrs HABIB BANK LIMITED — Appellant Versus BANKING COURT NO.II and 2 others — Respondents
Court: Sindh1995 C L C 1453
ABDUL RAZZAK ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus THE COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS and another‑‑‑Respondents
Court: KarachiP
LANGAR KHAN‑Convict‑Petitioner Versus THE CROWN‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1975 Karachi 771
MAHMOOD AZAM FAROOQI-Appellant Versus Maulana MUHAMMAD SHAFT OKARVI AND 9 others — Respondents
Court:2005 Y L R 388
WATAN PARTY through President, Lahore‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Law Secretary, Ministry of Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Islamabad and 7 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: LahorePLD 1990 Lahore 198
SHERSHAH ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus ADMINISTRATOR AUQAF, WEST PAKSITAN and 8 others ‑‑‑ Respondents
Court: