Home Maxims & Terms Obiter Dicta meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Obiter Dicta

Obiter Dicta legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2021 PLD 90 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Art. 189Decisions of Supreme Court binding on other CourtsObiter dictaScope

Decisions of Supreme Court are binding on all the courts subordinate to it when they decide the question of law and enunciate the principles of law

Even the obiter dicta of the Supreme Court is of greater value.

2005 YLR 388 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Even obiter dicta of Supreme Court are binding upon High Court

Any observation by Supreme Court even when obiter, is binding on High Court.

2000 SCMR 814 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Obiter DictaEvery case is an authority, to the extent the same decides the legal controversy passed in itDeclaration of law has to be confined to the four corners of the dispute agitated before the Court

Rest, if any, is obiter and obiter except of Supreme Court, or before it, of the Privy Council, is not/has not been binding.

1995 CLC 1453 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Obiter Dicta Obiter dicta of the Supreme Court was binding.

1988 MLD 413 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Obiter DictaObservations of co-ordinate Bench while deciding application during pendency of appealNature of observations of co-ordinate Bench would not be part of ratio decidendi but in the nature of obiter dicta.

[Ratio decidendi].

1975 PLD 771 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Court answering first question in negative, and second question not requiring any finding-Observations made on second question-Obiter dicta.

1968 PLD 1012 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
PrecedentObiter dicta

Opinion given on some point not necessary for decision of case -.Does not lay down law to be followed.

1950 PLD 126 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Obiter Dicta Observations of the nature of, by superior Court?Pot binding in every case on subordinate Courts.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Obiter Dicta", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3209

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Obiter Dicta"

PTD 2001
Civil Appeal No.9777 of 1995, decided on 25th January; 2000.

2001 P T D 833

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX Versus KANJI SHIVJI & CO.

Court: 242 I T R 124
PTD 2021
Writ Petition No.11351 of 2020, decided on 15th September, 2020.

2021 P T D 80

MUHAMMAD ZAHID, PROPRIETOR PLUS ENTERPRISES Versus FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE through Chairperson, Islamabad and 5 others

Court: Lahore High Court (Multan Bench)
CLC 2022
2021-December-16

2022 C L C 1188

AYESHA SAJID — Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Finance Secretary and 3 others — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 2004
Constitutional Petition No.35 of 2002, decided on 8th April, 2004.

P L D 2004 Supreme Court 600

ALL PAKISTAN NEWSPAPERS SOCIETY and others‑‑‑Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: IFTIKHAR MUHAMMAD CHAUDHARY, J.‑‑‑Above noted petition has been filed by the petitioners under Article 184(3) of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan hereinafter referred to as the Constitution.
CLD 2012
2011-April-1

2012 C L D 218

Messrs HABIB BANK LIMITED — Appellant Versus BANKING COURT NO.II and 2 others — Respondents

Court: Sindh
CLC 1995
First Civil Appeals Nos. 28 to 47 and 66 to 69 of 1993, decided on 11th January, 1995.

1995 C L C 1453

ABDUL RAZZAK ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus THE COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS and another‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Karachi
PLD 1950
Criminal Miscellaneous petition No. 1287 of 1946, decided on 1st May, 1947, under sections 491, 498 and 561‑A., Criminal Procedure Code, praying that the petitioner may be set at liberty and the judicial proceedings may be quashed.

P

LANGAR KHAN‑Convict‑Petitioner Versus THE CROWN‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1975
Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 625 of 1975 in Miscellaneous Appeal -No. 27 of 1975, decided on 17th June 1975.

P L D 1975 Karachi 771

MAHMOOD AZAM FAROOQI-Appellant Versus Maulana MUHAMMAD SHAFT OKARVI AND 9 others — Respondents

Court:
YLR 2005
Writ Petition No. 3930 of 2002, decided on 26th October, 2004.

2005 Y L R 388

WATAN PARTY through President, Lahore‑‑‑Petitioner Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Law Secretary, Ministry of Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Islamabad and 7 others‑‑‑Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1990
First Appeal from Order No.40 of 1971, decided on 8th October, 1989.

PLD 1990 Lahore 198

SHERSHAH ‑‑‑ Appellant Versus ADMINISTRATOR AUQAF, WEST PAKSITAN and 8 others ‑‑‑ Respondents

Court: