Home Maxims & Terms Obligations incurred meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Obligations incurred

Obligations incurred legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1992 PLD 1 FEDERAL-SHARIAT-COURT Judicial Precedent
"Muhkamat" and "Mutashabihat"

Connotation.

1982 SCMR 457 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Ss. 4 & 15-Pre-emption-Finding of High Court as to land in dispute being urban immovable property and not agricultural land for purpose of pre-emption not suffering from any legal mistake or errors in appreciation of evidence-Finding also supported from facts and features mentioned in order-Order held, not open to challenge Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185 (3).

1982 PLD 396 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

5. 6-Words and phrases-Expression "rights accrued" and "obligations incurred" appearing in S. 6-Exact meaning and scope of [Words and phrases].

1982 SCMR 204 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Ss. 15 & 16, read with Punjab Pre-emption Act (I of 1913), Ss. 4 & 6-Pre-emption-Sale of land by confirmed allottee of evacuee agricultural land with permanent rights-Held Pre-emptible.

1982 SCMR 1126 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

S. 15-Pre-emption-Land partly held under allotment by Settlement authorities and partly by way of purchase under provisions of Scrutiny of Claims (Evacuee Property) Regulation, 1961 [C. M. L. A's No. 891 [as amended by Martial Law Regulation 91 of 1961]-Held, pre emptible as a whole-[Pre-emption].

1982 SCMR 1080 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

S. 15-Pre-emption-Limitation-Contended that right of pre-emption by suitor N as co-sharer being personal right same came to end on his death occurring before passing of impugned judgment and decree after limitation run out and as such legal representatives of N possessed no independent pre-emption right on date of sale nor any pre-emptive rights held by deceased N devolved on them - Held: Suitor K and petitioner derived pre-emptive powers when both impleaded as parties in suit filed by K, N being neither impleaded nor both suits filed by N and K having been consolidated, despite suit of N having been filed earlier and been pending.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Obligations incurred", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3210

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Obligations incurred"

PLD 1982
Civil Appeal No. 375 of 1980, decided on 26th April, 1982.

1982S84

Mst. JALEESA BEGUM‑Appellant Versus IQBAL AHMAD QURESHI‑Respondent

Court: ‑‑‑S. 30 read with Evacuee Property and Displaced Persons Laws (Repeal) Act (XIV of 1975) and General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S. 6‑Protection against eviction‑Repeal, effect of‑Repeal taking place, situation, but for provisions like S. 6 of General Clauses Act, 1897, same as if repealed law never existed‑Protection from eviction envisaged by S. 30 of Act XXVIII of 1958, held, disappeared with repeat of such Act by Act XIV of 1975.‑Interpretation of statutes.
SCMR 1988
Civil Revision Petitions Nos.4, 5 and 6 of 1986, decided on 3rd November, 1987.

1988 S C M R 432

BOARD OF REVENUE and others — Petitioners Versus BASHIR AHMAD KHAN and others — Respondents

Court: High Court
CLD 2021
N/A

2021 C L D 153

Messrs RAFI COTTON INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. through Director and others — Appellants Versus ALLIED BANK LTD. through Manager and others — Respondents

Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)
PLD 1949
Execution Second ,Appeal No. 38 of 1948 from the order of the dated the 12th January, 1948, reversing that of the Subordinate Judge, 1st Class, Kasur, dated the 13th June, 1947.

P L D 1949 Lahore 79

KATHU-Judgment-Debtor-Appellant Versus ANJAMAN IMDAD QARZA-Decree-holder-Respondent

Court: Fundamental difference between shareholder of a company and" member of a co-operative society pointed out.
PTD 2022
Civil Appeals Nos. 354 to 356 of 2020, decided on 12th October, 2022.

2022 P T D 1869

Messrs A.J. TRADERS through Proprietor Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (ADJUDICATION) ISLAMABAD and others

Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan
PLC 1981
Civil Petition for Special Leave to Appeal No. 205 of 1980, decided on 12th March 1980.

1981 P L C 79

PAKISTAN ENGINEERING Co. LTD. Versus PUNJAB EMPLOYEES' SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION, AHORE

Court: Supreme Court
CLC 2009
2009-March-5

2009 C L C 843

FATEH SPORTS WEAR LIMITED — Plaintiff Versus RUSSIAN FEDERATION through Ministry of Foreign Economic Relations and Trade of the Russian Federation (MFER of Russia) and another — Defendants

Court: Karachi
PLC 2003
N/A

2003 P L C 399

Messrs RUPAFIL LIMITED through Personnel Manager Versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR, PUNJAB EMPLOYEES' SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION and 2 others

Court: Lahore High Court
PTD 1983
Wealth Tax Case No. 110 of 1972, decided on 30th November, 1982.

1983 P T D 335

COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX (CENTRAL). KARACHI Versus MESSRS PARACHA TEXTILE MILLS LTD., KARACHI

Court: Karachi High Court
PLD 1985
Writ Petition No. 977/11 of 1975, decided on 9th December, 1984.

P L D 1985 Lahore 294

Malik GUL SHAH-Petitioner Versus SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION AUTHORITIES

Court: