Obligations incurred
Obligations incurred legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Connotation.
Ss. 4 & 15-Pre-emption-Finding of High Court as to land in dispute being urban immovable property and not agricultural land for purpose of pre-emption not suffering from any legal mistake or errors in appreciation of evidence-Finding also supported from facts and features mentioned in order-Order held, not open to challenge Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 185 (3).
5. 6-Words and phrases-Expression "rights accrued" and "obligations incurred" appearing in S. 6-Exact meaning and scope of [Words and phrases].
Ss. 15 & 16, read with Punjab Pre-emption Act (I of 1913), Ss. 4 & 6-Pre-emption-Sale of land by confirmed allottee of evacuee agricultural land with permanent rights-Held Pre-emptible.
S. 15-Pre-emption-Land partly held under allotment by Settlement authorities and partly by way of purchase under provisions of Scrutiny of Claims (Evacuee Property) Regulation, 1961 [C. M. L. A's No. 891 [as amended by Martial Law Regulation 91 of 1961]-Held, pre emptible as a whole-[Pre-emption].
S. 15-Pre-emption-Limitation-Contended that right of pre-emption by suitor N as co-sharer being personal right same came to end on his death occurring before passing of impugned judgment and decree after limitation run out and as such legal representatives of N possessed no independent pre-emption right on date of sale nor any pre-emptive rights held by deceased N devolved on them - Held: Suitor K and petitioner derived pre-emptive powers when both impleaded as parties in suit filed by K, N being neither impleaded nor both suits filed by N and K having been consolidated, despite suit of N having been filed earlier and been pending.
"Obligations incurred", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3210
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Obligations incurred"
1982S84
Mst. JALEESA BEGUM‑Appellant Versus IQBAL AHMAD QURESHI‑Respondent
Court: ‑‑‑S. 30 read with Evacuee Property and Displaced Persons Laws (Repeal) Act (XIV of 1975) and General Clauses Act (X of 1897), S. 6‑Protection against eviction‑Repeal, effect of‑Repeal taking place, situation, but for provisions like S. 6 of General Clauses Act, 1897, same as if repealed law never existed‑Protection from eviction envisaged by S. 30 of Act XXVIII of 1958, held, disappeared with repeat of such Act by Act XIV of 1975.‑Interpretation of statutes.1988 S C M R 432
BOARD OF REVENUE and others — Petitioners Versus BASHIR AHMAD KHAN and others — Respondents
Court: High Court2021 C L D 153
Messrs RAFI COTTON INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. through Director and others — Appellants Versus ALLIED BANK LTD. through Manager and others — Respondents
Court: Lahore (Multan Bench)P L D 1949 Lahore 79
KATHU-Judgment-Debtor-Appellant Versus ANJAMAN IMDAD QARZA-Decree-holder-Respondent
Court: Fundamental difference between shareholder of a company and" member of a co-operative society pointed out.2022 P T D 1869
Messrs A.J. TRADERS through Proprietor Versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (ADJUDICATION) ISLAMABAD and others
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan1981 P L C 79
PAKISTAN ENGINEERING Co. LTD. Versus PUNJAB EMPLOYEES' SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION, AHORE
Court: Supreme Court2009 C L C 843
FATEH SPORTS WEAR LIMITED — Plaintiff Versus RUSSIAN FEDERATION through Ministry of Foreign Economic Relations and Trade of the Russian Federation (MFER of Russia) and another — Defendants
Court: Karachi2003 P L C 399
Messrs RUPAFIL LIMITED through Personnel Manager Versus DEPUTY DIRECTOR, PUNJAB EMPLOYEES' SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION and 2 others
Court: Lahore High Court1983 P T D 335
COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX (CENTRAL). KARACHI Versus MESSRS PARACHA TEXTILE MILLS LTD., KARACHI
Court: Karachi High CourtP L D 1985 Lahore 294
Malik GUL SHAH-Petitioner Versus SETTLEMENT AND REHABILITATION AUTHORITIES
Court: