Privilege
Privilege legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Privilege-A newspaper has no privilege beyond any other member of community in commenting on any matter of public interest-No privilege whatsoever, can be claimed by defendants on account of their position as newspapermen or as journalists-Defendants failing to establish occasion on which news published being a privileged occasion or publication having been made in discharge of some public or private duty publication, held, absolutely protected.
A personal privilege-Cannot be extended to professional work-Contention that counsel, a Senator, could not appear on date of hearing due to his attendance at session of Senate and was entitled to privileged treatment, held, entirely misconceived.
Ss. 123 & 162-"Affairs of State"-Privilege-Public officer summoned to produce document claimed to be privileged-Bound to bring such document to Court-Question whether particular document relates to any "affair of State" and therefore privileged-To be decided by Court-Question whether disclosure of contents of such document would be against public interest and if privilege should be claimed in that regard-To be decided by Head of Department concerned.
- Duty towards Court - Privileges - Duty towards client re: allegations in pleadings-Application for transfer of criminal case-Contempt of Court.
S. 123-Privilege-Mere word of head of department not sufficient to uphold objection.
Privilege S. 123-Privilege-ExtentCourt's duty to decide whether evidence required is of the description contemplated by section-Statements made during police investigation of criminal case, whether privileged apart from S. 162 Cr. P. C.-Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 172.
"Privilege", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3311
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Privilege"
2019 S C M R 165
JACQUES CHAGNON, IN HIS CAPACITY AS PRESIDENT OF THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OF QU BEC — Appellant Versus SYNDICAT DE LA FONCTION PUBLIQUE ET PARAPUBLIQUE DU QU BEC — Respondent and HONOURABLE SERGE JOYAL, P.C., AND SPEAKER OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ONTARIO — Interveners
Court: Supreme Court of Canada*2019 S C M R 1704
GLENCORE INTERNATIONAL AGand others — Plaintiffs Versus COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIAand others — Defendants
Court: High Court of Australia*1992 S C M R 1357
Mohtarma BENAZIR BHUTTO‑‑‑Appellant Versus THE PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN through
Court: Supreme Court of Pakistan2013 S C M R 403
PRUDENTIAL PLC and another — Appellants Versus SPECIAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX and another — Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of UK*P L D 1959 (W
M. MOOSA‑Plaintiff Appellant Versus MAHOMED and others‑Defendants‑Respondents
Court:P L D 2011 Lahore 115
NAZAR MUHAMMAD CHOOHAN — Petitioner Versus Dr. FAIZA ASGHAR and others — Respondents
Court: High CourtP L D 1954 Dacca 51
KHAIRAT HOSSAIN, M. L. A. and another‑Security‑Prisoners‑Petitioners Versus THE GOVERNMENT OF EAST BENGAL‑Opposite‑Party
Court:P L D 1993 Lahore 509
Malik GHIAS‑UD‑DIN ‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD SAEED ‑‑‑ Respondent
Court:P LID 1992 Supreme Court 492
MO HTARMA BENAZIR BHUT70 — Appellant Versus THE PRESIDENT OF PAKISTAN through the
Court: High Court