Home Maxims & Terms Punjab Jail Manual meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Punjab Jail Manual

Punjab Jail Manual legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

1989 PCRLJ 633 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Punjab Jail ManualRr. 546, 574 & 723Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199Undertrial prisonersImposition of fetters

Undertrial prisoners involved in thirty cases out of which twenty-eight related to dacoities, one to murder and three to Hudood Ordinance

Superintendent of Prisons was empowered to impose fetters on dangerous prisoners

Fetters were provided as a punishment as well as precautionary measures in relation to dangerous prisoners

Such power is confined upto maximum period of six months and thereafter permission (if Inspector-General of Prisons is required

No such endorsement of Superintendent Jail on history sheet of undertrial prisoner/petitioner existed but there was an endorsement to the effect that sanction of Inspector-General Prisons had been obtained

Superintendent of Prisons in a letter written to Inspector-General of Prisons had sought his permission to put fetters to certain undertrial prisoners which included name of petitioner

Action taken by Superintendent of Prisons held, was not mala fide in circumstances.

1984 PLC(CS) 795 SERVICE-TRIBUNAL-PUNJAB Judicial Precedent
Punjab Jail Manual

Paras. 1165 & 1167-Seniority of Assistant Superintendents of Jail-Determined on basis of results of departmental examination-Upheld by Service Tribunal-Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), S. 4.

1978 PLD 15 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

S. 57 (as amended by Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972)1 read with Punjab Jail Manual, para. 34(d)-Commutation of sentence-Retrospectivity of Legislation-Words "shall be deemed" in para. 34(d)Mean to apply order of commutation of sentence since date of sentence retrospectively-Amendment in S. 57 introduced by Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972-Not retrospective in effect.-[Sentence-Interpretation of statutes].

1977 PLD 44 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

R. 11(2)-Presumption-Change in prisoner's task duly entered in history ticket-Prisoner presumed to have been informed or have known such change in task-Prisoner not making any representation to authorities in matter-Presumed to have impliedly acquiesced Question of validity of change in task in circumstances, held, could not be gone into in writ petition.-[Writ].

1976 PLD 93 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

S. 344 read with Prisoners Act (III of 1900), Ss. 3 & 29 and Punjab Jail Manual, para. 148-Under-trial prisoner, detention of-Power conferred on Government under S. 29 of Act III of 1900 with regard to removal of prisoners - Not exerciseable in respect of under-trial prisoners-Under-trial prisoner cannot (save by order of court) be shifted or transferred from custody of officer-in- charge of prison (to whom custody of prisoner given by warrant issued by Court) to any other person or authority-Under-trial prisoner involved in number of cases pending trial at L-Transfer of prisoner from Jail at L to Central Jail at S on direction of Inspector-General of Prisons with concurrence of District Magistrate-Held t Without lawful authority.- (Custody).

1974 PLD 120 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Ss. 29 & 31 read with Punjab Jail Manual, 1955-Prisoners, rights of-To be treated like human beings, looked after for physical and mental health and provided facilities of good food;

1973 PLD 164 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

S.9(3), (5) read with Punjab Jail Manual, Ch. XXIII,. rr. 548 & 555-Prisoner can address communications to Government or Government officers in their official capacity-Jail authorities under obligation to afford facilities for purpose - Printers and Publishers forfeiting declarations under S. 9(3) cannot plead inability to apply, to District Magistrate under subsection (5) on account of their being lodged in jail.

1973 PLD 768 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Punjab Jail Manual Para. 656

Action of jail authorities gutting undertrial prisoners in fetters in jail premises-Must be based on specific order supported by special reasons with reference to specific entries in history tickets and other relevant registers

Specific procedure prescribed in para. or imposing fetters on prisoners

Mandatory in nature and cannot be dispensed with Punjab Jail Manual, paras. 388, 626, 654(ii), 658, 661, 732 & 1010-Constitution of Pakistan (1972), Art. 201.

1970 PCRLJ 1002 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Punjab Jail Manual Chap. III, Paras. 28 & 29Admission of prisoners-Duty of Jail Superintendent-Not to act as silent spectator-Superintendent bound to check legality and correctness of warrant.

1967 PLD 428 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Art. 6 (I)-Prisoners Act (III of 1900), S. 3-Penal Code (XLV of 1860), S. 224-Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898), S. 54 fifthly and Punjab Jail Manual, rr. 619 & 625-Person, tried by Military Court under Martial Law Regulations and convicted to 7 years' R. I., obtaining in collusion with prison authority illegal and fraudulent release prior to expiry of full term of imprisonment-Liable to be arrested and detained in Jail, on authority of original warrant, to serve out remaining period of sentence.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Punjab Jail Manual", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3402

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Punjab Jail Manual"

PLC(CS) 1984
Case No. 168/1299 of 1981, decided on 30th December, 1982.

1984 P L C (C

Ch. MUHAMMAD ISA Versus PUNJAB PROVINCE THROUGH INSPECTOR‑GENERAL OF PRISONS AND 4 OTHERS

Court: Service Tribunal Punjab
PLD 1978
Writ Petition No. 2808 of 1975, decided on 20th August 1977.

P L D 1978 Lahore 15

Sh. MUHAMMAD SHARIF-Petitioner Versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF PRISONS, PUNJAB. LAHORE

Court: S. 57 (as amended by Law Reforms Ordinance (XII of 1972)1 read with Punjab Jail Manual, para. 34(d)-Commutation of sentence-Retrospectivity of Legislation-Words "shall be deemed" in para. 34(d)Mean to apply order of commutation of sentence since date of sentence retrospectively-Amendment in S. 57 introduced by Law Reforms Ordinance, 1972-Not retrospective in effect.-Sentence-Interpretation of statutes.
PLD 1979
Writ Petition No. 3664 of 1978, decided on 19th November 1978.

P L D 1979 Lahore 260

KHALID JAVAID MALIK-Petitioner Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER-Respondents

Court: able-Fazal Din's case P L D 1969 S C 223 not applicable.
PCRLJ 1973
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 490/11 of 1972, decided on 30th October 1972.

1973 P Cr

SARDAR ALI — Petitioner Versus THE STATE AND ANOTHER — Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1977
Writ Petition No. 1455 of 1975, decided on 15th August 1976.

P L D 1977 Lahore 44

MUHAMMAD AJMAL KHAN‑Petitioner Versus SUPERINTENDENT, DISTRICT JAIL, KOT LAKHPAT‑ Respondent

Court: ‑‑ R. 11(2)‑Presumption‑Change in prisoner's task duly entered in history ticket‑Prisoner presumed to have been informed or have known such change in task‑Prisoner not making any representation to authorities in matter‑Presumed to have impliedly acquiesced Question of validity of change in task in circumstances, held, could not be gone into in writ petition.‑Writ.
PCRLJ 1970
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 5528/H of 1969, decided on 22nd September 1969.

1970 P Cr

MUKHTAR HUSSAIN-Petitioner Versus DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, JHANG AND ANOTHER Respondents

Court: Lahore
PLD 1967
7th November 1966

P L D 1967 Karachi 428

ABDULLAH‑Petitioner Versus SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL JAIL, KARACHI AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court: High Court
PLD 1969
N/A

1969L38

N/A

Court: High Court
PLD 1961
Criminal Revision Application No. 139 of 1961, decided on 16th May, 1961.

P L D 1961 (W

THE STATE‑Petitioner Versus MUHAMMAD ASHRAF‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1973
Writ Petition No. 204 of 1973, decided on 30th March 1973

Pages Missed In the books

NASIR MAHMOOD AND ANOTHER‑ — Petitioners Versus THE SUPERINTENDENT, CAMP JAIL, LAHORE AND ANOTHER — ‑Respondents

Court: