Home Maxims & Terms Punjab Land Records Manual meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Punjab Land Records Manual

Punjab Land Records Manual legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2005 YLR 162 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Ss. 135 & 150Punjab Land Records Manual, Chap. 18, para. 18.10Constitution of Pakistan (1973). Art. 199Cottstitutiottal petitionLimitationMode of partitionCoram non judicePrivate parties were co-owners in the landRespondents filed an application for partition of said landRevenue officer partitioned the land in accordance with the shares of the parties keeping in view their possessionSuch partition proposals were approved with the consent of the partiesLand teas partitioned in accordance with the recorded and admitted shares of the partiesMode of partition had not affected the title or possession of the petitioners

Objection was that under S.150 of the Land Revenue Act. 1967 the Girdawar could not have been appointed to determine the mode of partition and as such entire proceedings there coram non judice

Validity

2004 PLD 493 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Para. 7.49Classification of lands in Revenue and Irrigation Record based on source of irrigationScopeProperties irrigated only by rain water would be known as "barani"Properties irrigated by hill-torrents anal spring waters would be known as "aabi"

Properties having source of irrigation through a persian-wheel or tube-well would be described as "chahi" and "nal chahi" respectively

Properties having source of irrigation through Government canal would be described as "Nehri".

2004 MLD 597 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Para. 7.30West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), S.42Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S.9MutationStanding entries in the Land Revenue Record involving question of law and factsValidityRevenue functionaries cannot correct such entries

Proper remedy of aggrieved party is to approach the civil Court.

1989 CLC 837 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

S. 172 (2)(vi)??Land Records Manual, para. 99??Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), S.53?A??Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199?Rectification of entry in Khasra Gird awari??Petitioner had got executed an agreement to sell in his favour and on force of that agreement he got entered in Khasra Girdawari that he was in self?cultivation of land??Word "self?cultivation" was intended for the owners only?Petitioner being only in possession of agreement to sell had yet neither a sale?deed in his favour nor any mutation had been attested, so entry of self?cultivation was rightly rectified by Collector??Revenue Courts had concurrently found that rectification of entries in Khasra Girdawari was justified??No case for interference having been made out, Constitutional petition was dismissed. Muhammad Safdar Ali Iqbal v. Sher Muhammad etc. 1980 CLC 520 ref.

1988 PLD 277 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Para 7. 41- -Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art. 199-Tenant of a joint Khata purchasing part of same - - Effect- -Tenant of a joint Khata after purchasing a share thereof, held, would become a co-owner there in Such tenant was rightly shown as a co-owner in possession-Finding of revenue authorities being unexceptionable could not be interfered within constitutional jurisdiction of High Court.

1987 SCMR 413 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
S. 10Evacuee Property and Displaced Persons Laws (Repeal) Act (XIV of 1975), S. 2West Pakistan Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme, paras. 29 & 58(a)

Punjab Land Records Manual, paras. 7.49 & 7.51-Predecessor-in-interest of appellants getting allotment of land as an informant and after such land was confirmed in his name against his verified claim raising objection in his application before Chief Settlement and Rehabilitation Commissioner that classification relied upon while allotting land in question to him was incorrect and not in accordance with provisions laid down in paras. 29 & 58(a) of Rehabilitation Settlement Scheme and claimed more Produce Index Units contending that classification of land as entered in special Jamabandi and Khasra Girdawari for Rabi 1947 differed

Additional Settlement Commissioner, in compliance with directions of Chief Settlement and Rehabilitation Commissioner, getting necessary

1987 CLC 1342 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
S.8Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.199Kanungo, promotion ofRelaxation of age of candidates by Director, Land Records

Limits-Grounds for relaxation of age and promotion being that candidates could not be promoted earlier as there was no vacancy available, such ground, held, could hardly be a circumstance, muchless special, to exercise discretion vesting in the Director, Land Record

Discretionary powers have to be exercised judicially and not arbitrarily

Where departmental instructions were not faithfully complied with by the Authority, entire building raised on order of such Authority would come down with the result that order promoting candidates was no order in the eye of law.

1983 PLC(CS) 1051 SERVICE-TRIBUNAL-PUNJAB Judicial Precedent
Punjab Land Records Manual

R. 3.20 and Punjab Civil Servants; (Efficiency and Discipline) Rules, 1975, R. 6 (3)-Show-cause notice procedure-Justification-Patwari collecting himself land revenue from land owners and not depositing same in Government treasury-Associated in preliminary enquiry conducted to find out truth-Record indicating guilt 'as established besides admission of accused-Resort to show-cause notice procedure, in circumstances, held, caused no prejudice to accused and penalty of dismissal from service not exceptionable.-Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), S. 4.

1981 PLC(CS) 147 SERVICE-TRIBUNAL-PUNJAB Judicial Precedent
Punjab Land Records ManualPara. 3.24 read with West Pakistan Government Servants (Conduct) Rules, 166R. 31

Expression "any order of any competent authority, for the time being in force" used in r. 32 of West Pakistan Government Servants (Conduct) Rules, 1966

Clearly relates to instructions of type contained in Land Records Manual, para. 3.24-Such instructions, held' given statutory legitimacy by r. 32-Patwari, held, governed by restrictions regarding purchase of property contained in para. 3.24 of Land Records Manual-Violation of such instructions, held, rightly treated as misconduct.

1979 CLC 276 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Chap. 111, para. 3.81 read with Punjab Land Administration Manual, para. 383

Mutation-Recording of detailed report about transfer of land by Patwaris and affixing signatures of par ties to entries-Practice, held, irregular-Person, whose signatures can be affixed to entry trade in diary, is village Lambardar-Patwari obtaining signatures of Lawbardar only and none of parties-Report of Patwari and contents of mutation, held, not defective -[Mutation].

1977 PLD 60 QUETTA-HIGH-COURT-BALOCHISTAN Judicial Precedent

S. 52 read with Punjab Land Record Manual, para. 7.1 and Punjab Settlement Manual, para. 270-Mutation entries-Entry in mutation register-Does not form part of record-of-rights, hence no presumption of truth attached to such entry-Section 52, Land Revenue Act, 1967, hence, held, not applicable so as to raise presumption of truth in respect of entries in mutation registers-Entries in mutation registers-At beat only of evidentiary value, neither creating nor extinguishing title.-Record-of-rights]

1975 PLD 377 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Chap. VII, rr. 7.28 & 7.29-Jamabandi entries not enumerated in r. 7.28-Not to be varied in subsequent records (except to correct clerical errors) without first obtaining orders for variation on mutations entered for such purpose-Entry in mutation not expressly stating retention of hissa shamilat by vendor-Fard badar attested by Revenue Officer many years after the completion of sale regarding no transfer of hissa shamilat-No case of correction of clerical error in incorporating mutation in jamabandi, held, made out-Fard badar having been prepared in violation of relevant rules, document, held, rightly rejected by Courts below as having altered appellant's status of not being .owner at time of sale.

1971 PLC(CS) 158 SERVICE-TRIBUNAL-PUNJAB Judicial Precedent
Punjab Land Records Manual read with West Pakistan (North Zone) Patwari Subordinate Service Rules, 1963, rr. 10 & II

Seniority-Patwari candidates distinct and different from Patwaris - Provisions of Punjab Land Record Manual, Chapter III not inconsistent with provisions of West Pakistan (North Zone) Patwari Subordinate Service Rules, 1963 and thus saved vide r. 11 of West Pakistan (North Zone) Pal war! -Subordinate Service Rules, 1963-Rule 10 requiring preparation of seniority list of Patwaris on district-wise basis applicable to Parwaris appointed under Rules of 1963-Seniority list of Patwari candidates, held, should continue to be prepared tehsilwise in accordance with para. 3.6(a), Punjab Land Record Manual.

1970 PLD 160 PESHAWAR-HIGH-COURT Judicial Precedent

North-West Frontier Province Pre-emption Act (XIV of 1950), S. 12, thirdly-Right of pre-emption in respect of agricultural land-"Contiguous" property-"Holding", "Khasra" or Weld" number-Meaning-Holding or parcel of a land comprising in a number of fields bearing different Khasra numbers Remain, one property-Person pre-empting sale of such parcel of land need not own property contiguous to all Khasra numbers thereof-Person owning property contiguous to any part of such land-Held would have right to pre-empt entire land comprised in Khasra numbers-Punjab Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1887), S. 3 (3)-Punjab Land Records Manual.

1964 PLD 114 WEST-PAKISTAN-BOARD-OF-REVENUE Judicial Precedent

Punjab Land Records Manual paras. 7.28 & 7.29-"No rent" entry made in jamabandi without entering mutation to that effect-Does not carry presumption of truth.

1949 PLD 1 REVENUE-DECISION-PUNJAB Judicial Precedent

Punjab Land Records Manual-Chap. 7, paragraph 7.17. A mutation should not be refused merely because it is claimed that the alienor has no right by custom or statute to make such an alienation.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Punjab Land Records Manual", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3406

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Punjab Land Records Manual"

PLD 1949
Revision case No. 125 of 1946-47, referred by Commissioner, Rawal pindi Division, decided on 26th, June, 1948.

P

MUHAMMAD HAYAT, etc.-Applicants, Versus JAHAN KHAN-Respondent

Court:
SCMR 1988
Civil Petition No.230 of 1987, decided on 1st June, 1988.

1988 S C M R 1383

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ and others — Petitioners Versus MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUE — Respondent

Court: ---S.21--Punjab Land Record :Manual, para. 7.69--Pre-emption suit- Words "Mahal", "Deh" and 'Mauza' are equivalent to the word "estate".--Words and phrases.
PLD 1962
Revision No. 351 of 1960‑61, decided on 14th October 1961, District Muzaffargarh.

P L D 1962 W

Mst. JIVANEE‑Petitioner Versus FEROZE DIN AND ANOTHER‑Respondents

Court: (c) Mutation‑Widow inheriting as mother of issueless son --Making gift of estate in favour of daughter‑Revenue Officer not to go into intricate questions of power under custom to make a gift unless fact of "limited" ownership appears from Revenue Records‑Fact of possession, guiding principle in sanctioning mutation ‑Reversioners objecting to mutation may be referred to Civil Court‑Punjab Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1887), S. 37 5 P R (Rev.) 191.2 ; Punjab Land Records Manual (Financial Commissioner's Standing Orders) paras. 715, 717 ref., P L D 1954 Ph. (Rev.) 21 ; P L D 1955 Ph. (Rev.) 54 and P L D 1956 Lah. 934 ref. ; P L D 1952 (Rev.) 19 and 20 considered P L D 1960 W P (Rev.) 88 dissented from.
PLC(CS) 1971
Case No. 172/52 of 970, decided on 9th April 1971.

1971 P L C 158[C

GHLLAM HASAN AND 20 OTHERS Versus THE COMMISSIONER,MULTAN DIVISION, MULTAN

Court: 1971 P L C 158C.S.T.
PLD 1975
Regular Second Appeal No. 17 of 1964, decided on 3rd June 1974.

P L D 1975 Lahore 377

ABDUL GHANI‑Appellant Versus FEROZE DIN AND 3 OTHERS‑Respondents

Court:
PLD 1952
1951-August-4

P L D (Rev

Mst. JANAT BIBI and another‑Petitioners Versus MEHAR KHAN and others‑Respondents

Court: High Court
CLC 1994
Regular Second Appeal No. 144 of 1987, decided on 4th December, 1993.

1994CLC677

ROSHAN DIN and others‑‑‑Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD MAQBOOL‑‑‑Respondent

Court: Lahore
PLD 1988
Writ Petition No.2510 of 1986, decided on 17th February, 1988.

P L D 1988 Lahore 277

MITHOO- Petitioner Versus Member, Board of Revenue, Punjab, Lahore and 7 others Respondents

Court:
PLD 1974
Writ Petition No. 69/S of 1969, decided on 10th July 1973. ‑

P L D 1974 Lahore 193

ABDUS SAMAD AND 7 oTHERs‑Petitioners Versus THE COMMISSIONER, LAHORE DIVISION, LAHORE

Court:
PLD 1970
Regular Second Appeal No. 129 of 1967, decided on 22nd April 1970.

P L D 1970 Peshawar 160

MUHAMMAD YUSAF‑Plaintiff Appellant Versus SIKANDAR‑Defendant‑Respondent

Court: