Home Maxims & Terms Revenue meaning in Urdu
Word Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Revenue

Revenue legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2002 SCMR 1747 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Words and Phrases"Revenue"

Its broad and general meanings.

1989 PLD 121 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent
Expression "revenue" as applied to the income of Government

Meaning.

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Revenue", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3525

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Revenue"

PLD 1959
Writ Petition No. 8 of 1957, decided on 6th March 1959.

P L D 1959 (W

Malik KHIZAR HAYAT KHAN TIWANA‑Petitioner Versus PROVINCE OF WEST PAKISTAN and another‑‑-Respondents

Court:
PTD 2022
Income Tax Reference Application No.276 of 2018, decided on 19th April, 2021.

2022 P T D 109

Dr. ZAFAR SAJJAD through authorized attorney Versus COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE ZONE-I, REGIONAL TAX OFFICE-III, KARACHI

Court: Sindh High Court
PLC(CS) 1984
Cases Nos. 291/207 and 292/208 of 1983, decided on 9th April, 1984.

1984 P L C (C

FAIZ MUHAMMAD AND ANOTHER Versus MEMBER (REVENUE), BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB

Court: Service Tribunal Punjab
CLC 2020
21.11.2017. ref

2020 C L C 1453

NOOR ALAM KHAN and others — Petitioners Versus SENIOR MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE, KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA, PESHAWAR and others — Respondents

Court: Peshawar (D.I. Khan Bench)
PTD 2016
I.T.A. No.1563/LB of 2014, decided on 10th December, 2014.

2016 P T D (Trib

Messrs IMRAN PIPE MILLS (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE Versus COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE, ZONE-IV, RTO-I, LAHORE

Court: Inland Revenue Appellate Tribunal
MLD 2009
2009-May-28

2009 M L D 1172

MISBAHUDDIN KHAN and 16 others — Petitioners Versus BOARD OF REVENUE, SINDH through Member (Land Utilization), Hyderabad and 5 others — Respondents

Court: Karachi
PTD 1963
Civil Appeal No. 14 of 1961, decided on 16th May 1963.

1963 P T D 765

(2) BOARD OF REVENUE, WEST PAKISTAN THROUGH THE SECRETARY, BOARD OF REVENUE, LAHORE Appellants Versus Malik KHIZAR HAYAT KHAN TIWANA Respondent

Court: Supreme Court Pakistan
PLD 1963
Civil Appeal No. 14 of 1961, decided on 16th May 1963.

P L D 1963 Supreme Court 423

LAHORE‑Appellants Versus Malik KHIZAR HAYAT KHAN TIWANA‑Respondent

Court: Argument in favour of exclusion of khush haisiyyati from the expression "land revenue", built upon ground of contrast between provisions of Minor Canals Act, 1905 and section 37, Northern India Canal and Drainage Act, 1873, and upon sections 29 and 61, Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887 and section 4(10), Punjab Tenancy Act, 1887, was not approved.
PTD 2018
N/A

2018 P T D 1071

Messrs HAMZA NASIR WIRE Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN and others

Court: Lahore High Court
SCMR 1991
Civil Appeal No.122 of 1984, decided on 6th December, 1990.

1991 S C M R 689

FAIZ AHMAD and 16 others — Appellants Versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF KHAN and 8 others — Respondents

Court: ----Ss. 56, 51, 50, 49 & 47---West Pakistan Board of Revenue Act (XXI of 1957), S.4---Revision---Power under S.56 is concurrently enjoyed by the Board of Revenue and the Commissioner but it is in respect of the authorities subordinate to each one ---Fazalur Rehman and 12 others v. Board of Revenue, N: W.F.P. and 16 others PLD 1983 Pesh. 1 reversed.