Equity Justice and Good Conscience
Equity Justice and Good Conscience legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Law assists those who acre vigilant about their rights and not those who sleep over them.
"Equity Justice and Good Conscience", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3543
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Equity Justice and Good Conscience"
1978 P L C 222
MOHAMMAD ISHAQUE KHAN Versus DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, WORKSHOPS, PAKISTAN
Court: 1st Labour Court Punjab1981 S C M R 1200
BARKAT ULLAH KHAN — Petitioner Versus ABDUL HAMID-Respondent
Court: S. 106 read with S. 1 and Province of West Pakistan (Dissolution) Order, 1970 P. O. 1 of 1970, Art. 4, Central Adaptation of Laws Order, 1964 P. O. 1 of 1964-Applicability of statutes-Principles of equity, justice and good conscience-Notice to quit-Legislature did not itself make Transfer of Property Act, 1882 applicable to any part of country and left it to Provincial Governments to extend its application to their area by issuing notification-No such notification issued by Provincial Government to extend application of Act to Islamabad Federal Territory Transfer of Property Act, 1882, hence, held, not applicable to Islamabad Federal Territory Act, held further, could also not be made applicable to such territory merely for reason of its being a Federal Area and Act concerned being a Central Act-Nor could suit for ejectment fail on ground to failure to comply with principles of equity, justice and good conscience due to previous notice to quit having not been given by landlord to tenant. Interpretation of statutes.P L D 1976 Lahore 930
Haji NIZAM KHAN‑Petitioner Versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LYALLPUR AND OTHERS‑‑‑
Court: Maintenance‑Obligations and rights of opulent and needy relations in Muslim society‑Grandfather in easy circumstances‑Bound to maintain and support needy grand children,‑Maintenance.P L D 1952 Dacca 57
ASGAR ALI PRADHAN‑Appellant Versus MANIRUDDIN SHEIKH‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1963 (W
CAPT. JOSEPH A. LOBO AND OTHERS-Appellants Versus PHILLIPS MATHEW-Respondent
Court:1999 C L C 1421
THAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY‑‑‑Petitioner Versus ABDUR REHMAN‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Lahore2002 Y L R 989
BIJAR KHAN‑‑‑Applicant Versus GHOUS MUHAMMAD KHAN‑‑‑Respondent
Court: Karachi1978 S C M R 307
THE KARACHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KARACHI — Petitioner Versus WORKS CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY, KARACHI
Court: High CourtP L D 1970 Karachi 481
Plaintiff Versus Mst. NAFIZUN NISA BEGUM AND 9 OTHERS — Defendants
Court: Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), S. 73, O. XXI, r. 52 & O. XXXVIII, r. 5‑Execution‑Distribution, of assets‑9ttach ment of property in custody of Court‑Rateable distribution amongst decree‑holders‑Principles of rateable distribution in S. 73 are principles of equity and should be applied in respect of property attached under O. XXI, r. 52‑Non‑filing of execution application immediately after obtaining decree‑ Cannot give preference to a later decree‑hold r, over earlier decree‑holder, merely b, cause he was first in point of time, in making execution application‑E. M. Visvanadhan Chetty v. Arunachelum Chetty L L R 44 Mad. lb , dissented from.P L D 1967 Karachi 755
MERCANTILE CO-OPERATIVD BANK LTD. Plaintiffs Versus MESSRS HABIB & CO. AND OTHERS-Defendants
Court: High Court