Sale of Goods
Sale of Goods legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Goods can be sold after due notice to the owner by public auction or tender or private offer or with the consent of owner in writing, in any other manner
No other manner has been provided/prescribed by Legislature.
Property in goods, would not pass to a person when sale of such property is at negotiating stage.
Plea raised that after having sold goods, respondent could only sue for recovery of price and not for possession of goods
Prayer in suit/decree being for recovery of goods or price in alternative, and buyer being ready to pay price, petitioner-buyer, held, free to discharge his liability by paying price to respondent in execution of decree
Matter requiring no interference by Supreme Court, petition dismissed.
Ss. 54 & 73-Sale of goods-Breach of contract-Goods being not received as per contract, information sought from foreign company, supplied-Foreign company acknowledging receipt of such letter informing through telegram of arrangements being in progress for shipping of goods and respondents assured with regard to responsibility of Foreign company in such regard-Shippers hence, held, being still in process of making arrangements for shipment of goods, respondents having been directly dealing with shippers being conscious of their obligations and entitlement under C. I. F. Contract, without recourse to sellers findings making appellant liable on such evidence, held, not sustainable.
Sale of Goods -Earnest money - Contract of sale of goods-Buyer alleging breach and filing suit for recovery of (i) advance deposit; (ii) loss and (iii) interest-Trial Court dismissing suit but at same time holding that seller was not entitled to forfeit advance and yet granting no decree for refund of deposit-Amount of earnest money, held, recoverable.
Sale of goods-Earnest money part of purchase price-"Earnest money" and "advance deposit" Synonymous-Liable to forfeiture if transaction falls through by reason of fouls or failure of vendee-Contract Act (IX of 1872), S. 74.
Sale of Goods Buyer rejecting goods on wrong ground-Not precluded from relying on ground well founded and correct.
S. 16 (2)-Sale of goods Purchaser has right to expect only saleable goods - Warranty of merchantability implied.
Merchantability, implied condition of sale and not merely warranty-Goods supplied to buyer, not in conformity with contract-Mere fact that buyer on delivery resold goods-Not enough to establish goods to be merchantable-Buyer, in certain circumstances, can reject goods and at same time resell them-Re-sale of goods in such circumstances
Not indication of exercise of dominion inconsistently with ownership of seller -Sale of Goods Act (111 of 1930), Ss. 16 (2) & 59-Contract Act (IX of 1872), S. 73 Explanation.
Sale of Goods Bilti Cut transaction-Meaning.
Contract Act (IX of 1872), S. 176.
Sale of Goods Sale is of "specified" goods when goods are "identified" and "ascertained"-Sale of goods in process of "being imported"
Not sale of "specified" goods-Sale of Goods Act (III of 1930), S. 19 (1).
Sale of Goods Sales of goods-Packing materials-Bleaching or dyeing of unbleached yarn and cloth-Charges for packing and cost of packing materials not shown separately in bills-Whether sale turnover of packing materials can be assessed to tax-Profit making motive for packing materials-Whether necessary [Madras General Sales Tax Act (IX of 1939), S. 2 (h), (i)].
"Sale of Goods", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3556
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Sale of Goods"
1998 P T D 3863
Messrs WAHEED CORPORATION (REGD.) Versus CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD through Chairman and 4 others
Court: Lahore High CourtP L D 1959 (W
THE EASTERN AUTOMOBILE LTD. ‑ — Defendant‑Appellant Versus TASDIQUE HUSSAIN, I. F. S., Conservator of Forests‑ — Plaintiff — ‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1998 Karachi 1
Messrs PETROCOMMODITIES (PVT.) LTD. — Appellant Versus RICE EXPORT CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN — Respondent
Court: High CourtP L D 1958 (W
Appellants Versus MESSRS THOMAS COOK & SONS LTD., KARACHI
Court: (b) Contract Act (IX of 1872), Chapter 1X Ss. 148 to 181 Rights and duties of bailee.1990 P T D 605
Messrs KAMRAN INDUSTRIES LIMITED Versus DEPUTY COLLECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE AND LAND CUSTOMS,
Court: Karachi High CourtP L D 1958 Dacca 512
MESSRS AHMED ABDUL GANI, MERCHANTS‑Appellants Versus MESSRS RAHMANIA TRADING Co., MERCHANTS Respondents
Court:P L D 1957 (W
Before Constantine and Wahid-ud-Din, JJ Versus ABDULLA-Respondent
Court:1963 P T D 231
MESSRS SHARIF COTTON FACTORY‑Petitioner Versus INCOME‑TAX OFFICER, KARACHI‑Respondent
Court: Pakistan Karachi1972 P T D 416
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, MADRAS Versus JANAB N. HYATH BATCHA SAHIB
Court: Madras (India)P L D 1963 (W
MESSRS SHARIF COTTON FACTORY-Petitioner Versus INCOME-TAX OFFICER, KARACHI-Respondent
Court: