Home Maxims & Terms Sale of Goods meaning in Urdu
Legal Term Pakistani Jurisprudence Reference

Sale of Goods

Sale of Goods legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.

Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)

2002 PLD 60 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
S. 201Sale of goodsMethods

Goods can be sold after due notice to the owner by public auction or tender or private offer or with the consent of owner in writing, in any other manner

No other manner has been provided/prescribed by Legislature.

1988 PLD 390 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Property in goods, would not pass to a person when sale of such property is at negotiating stage.

1985 SCMR 1369 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent
Art. 185(3)Sale of Goods Act (III of 1930), S. 55Sale of goods-Non-payment of priceSuit for recovery of price/ possession of goods-Decree against buyer, upheld, in second appeal

Plea raised that after having sold goods, respondent could only sue for recovery of price and not for possession of goods

Prayer in suit/decree being for recovery of goods or price in alternative, and buyer being ready to pay price, petitioner-buyer, held, free to discharge his liability by paying price to respondent in execution of decree

Matter requiring no interference by Supreme Court, petition dismissed.

1982 SCMR 1232 SUPREME-COURT Judicial Precedent

Ss. 54 & 73-Sale of goods-Breach of contract-Goods being not received as per contract, information sought from foreign company, supplied-Foreign company acknowledging receipt of such letter informing through telegram of arrangements being in progress for shipping of goods and respondents assured with regard to responsibility of Foreign company in such regard-Shippers hence, held, being still in process of making arrangements for shipment of goods, respondents having been directly dealing with shippers being conscious of their obligations and entitlement under C. I. F. Contract, without recourse to sellers findings making appellant liable on such evidence, held, not sustainable.

1969 PLD 233 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Sale of Goods -Earnest money - Contract of sale of goods-Buyer alleging breach and filing suit for recovery of (i) advance deposit; (ii) loss and (iii) interest-Trial Court dismissing suit but at same time holding that seller was not entitled to forfeit advance and yet granting no decree for refund of deposit-Amount of earnest money, held, recoverable.

1967 PLD 714 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Sale of goods-Earnest money part of purchase price-"Earnest money" and "advance deposit" Synonymous-Liable to forfeiture if transaction falls through by reason of fouls or failure of vendee-Contract Act (IX of 1872), S. 74.

1965 PLD 374 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Sale of Goods Buyer rejecting goods on wrong ground-Not precluded from relying on ground well founded and correct.

1965 PLD 202 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

S. 16 (2)-Sale of goods Purchaser has right to expect only saleable goods - Warranty of merchantability implied.

1964 PLD 608 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Sale of Goods Sale of Goods-Damages-Sale by description

Merchantability, implied condition of sale and not merely warranty-Goods supplied to buyer, not in conformity with contract-Mere fact that buyer on delivery resold goods-Not enough to establish goods to be merchantable-Buyer, in certain circumstances, can reject goods and at same time resell them-Re-sale of goods in such circumstances

Not indication of exercise of dominion inconsistently with ownership of seller -Sale of Goods Act (111 of 1930), Ss. 16 (2) & 59-Contract Act (IX of 1872), S. 73 Explanation.

1962 PLD 680 LAHORE-HIGH-COURT-LAHORE Judicial Precedent

Sale of Goods Bilti Cut transaction-Meaning.

1962 PLD 565 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent
Sale of Goods -Belonging to another-Inroad on rights of owner

Contract Act (IX of 1872), S. 176.

1961 PLD 203 KARACHI-HIGH-COURT-SINDH Judicial Precedent

Sale of Goods Sale is of "specified" goods when goods are "identified" and "ascertained"-Sale of goods in process of "being imported"

Not sale of "specified" goods-Sale of Goods Act (III of 1930), S. 19 (1).

1960 PTD 635 MADRAS-HIGH-COURT-INDIA Judicial Precedent

Sale of Goods Sales of goods-Packing materials-Bleaching or dyeing of unbleached yarn and cloth-Charges for packing and cost of packing materials not shown separately in bills-Whether sale turnover of packing materials can be assessed to tax-Profit making motive for packing materials-Whether necessary [Madras General Sales Tax Act (IX of 1939), S. 2 (h), (i)].

Sponsored Content / تشہیری مواد
How to cite this page: "Sale of Goods", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3556

Precedents & Case Laws citing "Sale of Goods"

PTD 1998
Writ Petition No.25995 of 1997, decided on 14th September, 1998.

1998 P T D 3863

Messrs WAHEED CORPORATION (REGD.) Versus CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, ISLAMABAD through Chairman and 4 others

Court: Lahore High Court
PLD 1959
First Appeal No. 73 of 1951, decided on 23rd April 1959.

P L D 1959 (W

THE EASTERN AUTOMOBILE LTD. ‑ — Defendant‑Appellant Versus TASDIQUE HUSSAIN, I. F. S., Conservator of Forests‑ — Plaintiff — ‑Respondent

Court:
PLD 1998
1996-December-2

P L D 1998 Karachi 1

Messrs PETROCOMMODITIES (PVT.) LTD. — Appellant Versus RICE EXPORT CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN — Respondent

Court: High Court
PLD 1958
First Appeal No. 49 of 1953, decided on 6th February 1958.

P L D 1958 (W

Appellants Versus MESSRS THOMAS COOK & SONS LTD., KARACHI

Court: (b) Contract Act (IX of 1872), Chapter 1X Ss. 148 to 181 Rights and duties of bailee.
PTD 1990
Constitutional Petition No. D‑341 of 1982, decided on 25th April, 1990.

1990 P T D 605

Messrs KAMRAN INDUSTRIES LIMITED Versus DEPUTY COLLECTOR, CENTRAL EXCISE AND LAND CUSTOMS,

Court: Karachi High Court
PLD 1958
First Appeal No.113 of 1953, decided on 9th December 1957.

P L D 1958 Dacca 512

MESSRS AHMED ABDUL GANI, MERCHANTS‑Appellants Versus MESSRS RAHMANIA TRADING Co., MERCHANTS Respondents

Court:
PLD 1957
First Appeal No. 32 of 1951, decided on 30th October 1956.

P L D 1957 (W

Before Constantine and Wahid-ud-Din, JJ Versus ABDULLA-Respondent

Court:
PTD 1963
Writ Petition Nos. 615 and 621 of 1962, decided on 24th October 1962.

1963 P T D 231

MESSRS SHARIF COTTON FACTORY‑Petitioner Versus INCOME‑TAX OFFICER, KARACHI‑Respondent

Court: Pakistan Karachi
PTD 1972
Tax Case No. 2177 of 1964 (Reference No. 76 of 1964) decided on 25th June 1968.

1972 P T D 416

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, MADRAS Versus JANAB N. HYATH BATCHA SAHIB

Court: Madras (India)
PLD 1963
Writ Petitions Nos. 615 and 621 of 1962, decided on 24th October 1962.

P L D 1963 (W

MESSRS SHARIF COTTON FACTORY-Petitioner Versus INCOME-TAX OFFICER, KARACHI-Respondent

Court: