Seaworthy
Seaworthy legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
Meaning, scope and import of.
"Seaworthy", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3567
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Seaworthy"
1982 P T D 116
PAN ISLAMIC STEAMSHIP Co. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME‑TAX, KARACHI (WEST), KARACHI
Court: High Court KarachiP L D 1989 Karachi 45
Shaikh MUHAMMAD ANWAR and another — Petitioners Versus PAKISTAN through the Secretary Ministry of Communication, Islamabad and 2 others — Respondents
Court: High Court2013 C L D 1829
METAL CONSTRUCTION OF GREECE S.A. (MEKTA S.A.), ATHENS through Attorney — Plaintiff Versus OWNERS OF THE VESSEL m.v. LADY REA — Defendant
Court: SindhP L D 1992 Karachi 444
DADA STEEL MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED, KARACHI‑‑Plaintiff Versus m.v.I. VAN and 2 others‑‑Defendants
Court:P L D 1968 Karachi 252
CENTRAL INSURANCE Co. LTD.‑‑Plaintiff Versus (1) CHITTAGONG STEAMSHIP CORPORATION LID., AND 9
Court: (a) Carriage of Goods by Sea Act (XXVI of 1925), Art. III(6) Implied agreement between carrier and consignee to extend time for bringing suit and to compensate‑Consignee has a new cause of action from date of agreement‑Can bring suit either for specific performance of such agreement within 3 years or for compensation for breach of such agreement also within 3 years‑Abdul Jalil Chowdhury v. Muhammadi Steamship Co. P L D 1961 S C 340 ref. and Newzealand Insurance Co. v. United Oriental Steamship Co. P L D 1962 Kar.,151 considered.1997 C L C 447
PROVINCE OF NORTH‑WEST‑FRONTIER through Director of Industries, Commerce and Mineral Development and another‑‑‑Plaintiffs Versus Messrs S.M. JAFFER & Co. and 5 others‑‑‑Defendants
Court: KarachiP L D 1969 Karachi 363
ABDUL MAJID KHAN‑Appellant Versus THE EASTERN GENERAL INSURANCE Co., KARACHI‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1970 Karachi 70
ABDUL MAJID KHAN-Appellant Versus THE EASTERN GENERAL INSURANCE Co.
Court:P L D 1988 Karachi 390
POONG SAN FISHERIES COMPANY LTD.‑‑ Plaintiffs Versus m.v. ZOHRA‑I and 2 others‑‑Defendants
Court: sell the ship but he can hold possession thereof, till dues are paid‑ Where Court, had dispossessed such lien holder and vessel was sold, then out of sale proceeds, such person would be paid his dues subject to rules of priorities.‑‑Words and phrases.P L D 1968 Supreme Court 15
EAST AND WEST STEAMSHIP Co.‑ — Appellant Versus (1) HOSSAIN BROTHERS,
Court: