Repugnant
Repugnant legal meaning, translation and judicial precedents.
Meaning & Judicial Interpretation: (اردو مفہوم اور قانونی تشریح)
"Repugnant"-Meaning.
"Repugnant", Pakistan Law Portal, available at: https://paklawportal.com/words-terms-maxims/3618
Precedents & Case Laws citing "Repugnant"
1989 S C M R 2012(2)
QAZALBASH WAQF Appellant Versus CHIEF LAND COMMISSIONER PUNJAB, LAHORE
Court: Shariat Appellate Bench1989 SCMR 2012(1)
SULTAN KHAN Appellant Versus THE GOVERNMENT OF N.‑W.F.P. through Secretary,
Court: Shariat Appellate BenchP L D 1939 Supreme Court 633
FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law and another‑‑Appellants Versus GUL HASAN KHAN‑‑Respondent
Court: Shariat Appellate BenchP L D 1988 Federal Shariat Court 113
MUHAMMAD YOUSUF and 2 others‑‑Petitioners Versus THE STATE‑‑Respondent
Court:P L D 1987 Lahore 358
ABDUL GHAFFAR KHAN and others‑‑Appellants/Petitioners Versus SAGHIR AHMAD ASLAM and others‑‑Respondents
Court:1979 S C M R 509
MUHAMMAD RIAZ‑Petitioner Versus PAKISTAN AND OTHERS ‑RESPONDENTS
Court: ‑‑‑ Part VII, Chap. 3‑A as inserted by Constitution (Amendment) Order (P. O. 3 of 1979)‑Declaration of law as repugnant to injunctions of Islam‑Repugnancy of any law at present in force to injunctions of Islam‑To be decided by High Court on its original side‑High Court also to specify in its judgment day on which its decision to take effect‑Once such decision rendered President, or Governor, as case may be, to take steps to amend law so as to bring same into conformity with injunctions of Islam‑Such law, to extent, held, to be repugnant to cease to have effect on day on which decision of Court takes effect‑Matter still pending before Shariat Bench in High Court and no final order made‑Injunctions of Islam regarding composition of offence of murder, held, not yet enforced and premature for Courts to strike down impugned provisions of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898.P L D 1987 Labors 58
MUHAMMAD SHARIF‑Petitioner Versus MEMBER (REVENUE), BOARD OF REVENUE,
Court: ‑‑Art. 203‑D ‑ Object and scope of Arts. 203‑D(2) & 203‑D(3) Obligation of President/Governor to bring laws in conformity with injunctions of Islam after same having been declared to be repugnant to Islam by Shariat Court/Supreme Court Shariat Appellate Bench and effect of its non‑compliance ‑ Words "if possible" used in Government of N.‑ W. F. P. v. Malik Said Kamal Shah P L D 1986 S C 360‑Connotation of.‑Words and phrases.P L D 1986 Supreme Court 360
GOVERNMENT OF N.‑W.F.P. THROUGH SECRETARY, LAW DEPARTMENT‑Appellant Versus Malik SAID KAMAL SHAH‑Respondent
Court: Shariat Appellate Bench1993 S C M R 1697
(LAW AND JUSTICE) DIVISION‑‑Petitioner Versus QAZALBASH WAQF, LAHORE and 26 others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: Supreme Court of PakistanP L D 1992 Federal Shariat Court 501
MUHAMMAD IQBAL CHAUDHRY, ADVOCATE HIGH COURT, LAHORE and another‑‑‑Petitioners Versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, M/O. Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Government of Pakistan Islamabad and others‑‑‑Respondents
Court: ‑‑‑‑S. 21 as amended by House Building Finance Corporation (Amendment) Ordinance (XL of 1979)‑‑‑Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art.203‑DD‑‑ Repugnancy to Injunctions of Islam‑‑‑Borrowing power mentioned in S.21 has to be based on interest free transaction‑‑‑Section 21 in its present form is, therefore, repugnant to Injunctions of Islam and is to be amended accordingly.